Vilma, the Glad Girl

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Unlike Nora la Dolorosa, the durable Vi Santos has made happiness her career By Quijano De Manila

Durable is a word that shifts nuance when applied to Vilma Santos. Yes, you can say that, for instance, Gloria Romero, Nida Blanca and Charito Solis are durable because they are still on view as performers, if no longer at center stage. But when you say that Vilma Santos is durable you mean she is still at center, in front, on top. Now that’s phenomenal because in Philippine cinema 10 years seems to be the limit for female stardom. After 10 years you slip to character and supporting roles. But Vilma is on her 28th year in showbiz and the spotlight is hers yet as leading lady, the only one to match the record of Dolphy and Ronnie Poe. When she started out, Amalia Fuentes and Susan Roces were the glamour queens. Then she and Nora outshone them. Today, after several changings of the guard, the prima donnas are Sharon Cuneta and Gretchen Barretto. Nora Aunor is no longer in the running, at least not at the moment. But Vilma is. Very much so. And she can romance a whole new generation of leading men like Gabby Concepcion and Richard Gomez with no sense of strain or disparity.

Ishmael Bernal, who claims to have directed Vilma’s best pictures, believes she has endured because she has physical, emotion and mental endurance. ‘She could work for 24 hours straight without getting tired, without flagging in her acting. There were times when we had to shoot for three or four successive days, getting very little sleep, but there Vilma would be: fresh, enthusiastic, rarin’ to go. Physical endurance is very important to a star. Another thing I noticed was her strong sense of competition. At that time, though of course, she didn’t say so, it was Nora she wanted to beat. Vilma was out to be the bigger star, the better actress. And so she geared her career for a zoom to the top.” Bernal first directed her in Inspiration (1971), produced by Tagalog Ilang-Ilang from a script by Nestor Torre. ‘This was at the height of the Nora-Vilma rivalry and the competing love teams were Nora-Tirso[Cruz] and Vilma-Edgar[Mortiz]. But in Inspiration, Atty. Laxa decided to pair Vilma with a rising new star: Jay Ilagan. That early, I noted that Vilma had the potential to become a great dramatic star. At that time she was not yet doing actress roles, only juvenile fan movies. Her assets were the expressiveness of her eyes, very important for the camera; the creaminess of her complexion, very important on the screen; and the ability to make her audience sympathize if not identify with her. Another thing I noticed was that she’s perfectly relaxed in front of the camera: no sense of compulsion. She just stands there and with a flick of the eye, a movement of the hand, she communicates whatever emotion has to be communicated to the audience. Unlike theater actors who feel they have to use the entire body to communicate, she achieves her effects with the simplest gestures. She already had perfect timing.” 

Inspiration was a comedy and Vilma, to Bernal’s delight, needed very little rehearsal. ‘She didn’t enjoy too much rehearsing, preferring to give all on take one, confident in her spontaneity. Which was what her director wanted. Another thing I remember about the early Vilma: she was a travelling department store. She had a van that looked like the fourth floor of Rustan’s filled with clothes, clothes, clothes, and hundreds of shoes, hats, bras, panties, and costume jewels, all of them nursed by loving alalays who followed her everywhere she went. If the director required an evening gown, a negligee, a pajama top, she had it in her van.” Bernal next worked with Vilma in 1972, on Now and Forever, scripted by Rolando Tinio and co-starring her with Edgar Mortiz and Tommy Abuel. It was a dismal flop, says Ishmael Bernal: ‘So let’s not talk about it.” It wasn’t until six years later that he and Vilma worked together again, on Dalawang Pugad, Isang Ibon. ‘It was written by Jose Nadal Carreon, the former police reporter and UP literary apprentice, and currently one of our best directors. It was an adult film and it started a new trend for Vilma: playing the other woman. The film was very hot copy because it was the comeback vehicle of Romeo Vasquez, with whom she was then having an affair. I found Vilma different: she had already matured. She must have been around 23 or 24. She was up in the clouds, being very much in love with Romeo Vasquez, and having already beaten Nora in the game of Who’s No. 1? This was in 1978. Nora was doing action movies like Super Gee that were flopping miserably. But Vilma’s career had taken a new path: heavy drama.”

The change in Vilma was not all to be good. ‘I noticed that she was often tired, often had difficulty keeping up her energy or concentration. The message projected was that the business of acting and the pressures of showbiz in general were beginning to tell on her.” The prime reason was the exhausting affair with Romeo Vasquez. ‘That affair was blown up by the press to scandalous proportions and I could feel that she was under pressure. Still, she tried to keep up a brave front, to be always polite: the smiling professional, and to hide from the public her inner turmoil. She was getting a bad press because of this affair with an older man, a notorious playboy, but the affair was a big factor in the maturing of Vilma Santos. When she made Dalawang Pugad, Isang Ibon she was saying goodbye to adolescence. She was saying: ‘I am a woman, I am entitled to happiness, I am entitled to the love of the man I want to love!’ It was during this period she uttered the most famous of Vilma quotes when she said of those who were bad-mouthing her: ‘To hell with all of them!’ this was her declaration of independence, of adulthood, of resistance. The film proved to be a very big success, nominated for various awards, though she didn’t gain an acting award.”

Vilma’s next Bernal film was 1978’s Ikaw ay Akin, again scripted by Joe Carreon, and starring Vilma and Nora together, with Christopher de Leon as their leading man. In this film, says Bernal, was set the persona Vilma would portray in a series of sex melodramas. ‘She played a liberated woman who had grown up in the States: very witty, very nervous, very aggressive, a chain smoker and fast talker, who’s trying to steal Christopher de Leon from Nora Aunor. Her character was neurotic, a free spirit, unpredictable; and I noticed again that Vilma herself was on edge from too much hard work. I could understand her arriving late on the set because I knew she was doing four or five movies at the same time. She would just sleep in the car while rushing from one location to another and she would arrive looking groggy and exhausted. Sometimes she would just give up and beg that the shooting be postponed because her body just couldn’t take it any more.”

She was then the top box-office queen and the top dramatic actress and it’s always a strain to keep on top. But the ‘glad girl” that’s the basic Vilma Santos continued to shine through the murk of those harrowing days, as Bernie Bernal recalls. ‘However tired or sleepy, she remained carinosa, always polite, and all smiles to the crew. She would buy them merienda and at the end of shooting would throw a feast for them: lechon and pancit. She was always considerate with the crew.

Some movie stars get carried away by a sense of their importance: they know they are carrying the movie, are responsible for its success, are making big money for their producers. And so they become temperamental. Vilma is quite aware of her importance and make no mistake about it: she has the qualities needed for survival in a cruel ungrateful world. She is a fighter, she has a killer instinct. All movie stars, especially the superstars, necessarily have this instinct. But in Vilma it goes with a real concern for others. And she wants her public image to be positive.”

So, even in a time of crisis, Vilma preserved her image as a glad girl – while Nora was busy setting herself up, or down, as la Dolorosa. If Vilma works at happiness, Nora has made a career of masochism. Bernal says that in Ikaw ay Akin Vilma was already conscious of her own particular style of acting, which can be described as minimal: less is more. The fewer and simpler the gestures, the greater the effect. The stripped style won her a grandslam when she did Relasyon with Bernie, which he rates as her most memorable film. It got her all the awards on the market. ‘In Relasyon Vilma made the character of a mistress very human and sympathetic, not just a contravida. The film was her comeback after her pregnancy. She and Edu Manzano had just had their baby boy, Lucky. Her next film, Broken Marriage, set another trend for her; the role of a modern urban working girl, as sophisticated as her Makati office and her personal problems. Her fans are growing up and Vilma’s image is becoming more and more complicated.

But it was in the last film we did together, 1988’s Pahiram ng Isang Umaga, that I noticed the big change in Vilma. She had become an artist. She was no longer just a movie star following the director’s instructions. She was very hyper, very high, eager to experiment: a cooperative and mature actress. She had studied the script in advance and she had sensible suggestions about it. I felt I was no longer working with a movie star but that she and I were two artists collaborating on an objective statement about life and death and human relationships.” How did a girl who began as purely ‘pang-masa” develop into so fine an artist? Vilma herself gives the credit to her willingness to learn. The process was sometimes painful but, says Vilma, she knew it was all part of her education. I am now 28 years in this business and everything I have learned has made me a stronger woman. Even the troubles, the intrigues – they have made me a stronger woman. I’m always learning. For example, there was a part of my career that was for me a very expensive education.” She had set up a production company of her own that, it turned out, was mostly producing debts.‘ That was about 15 years ago. I tried producing and I made about five movies for VS Films, my own outfit. It was managed by my mother, not by me personally, and Mama is so good people take advantage of her. Before I knew it I was drowning in debt. I was pregnant at the time, 1980, when I learned I had a debt of six million pesos! And I didn’t even know if, after giving birth, audiences would still accept me. How was I to survive? I prayed; I told God I was willing to work, sarado ang mata, just to pay off all those debts. And with his blessings I was given a second chance. After giving birth to my son, my career got a second chance and became even more successful: not only did I continue to be box-office but I was winning awards right and left.”

Before Lucky’s birth she had no contract with any studio but after his birth the two leading studios, Regal and Viva, asked to place her under contract and she signed up with both! ‘It was arranged that everything they paid me went straight to the banks, to pay off my debts. Not a centavo of my movie earnings passed through my hands. We lived on my television earnings. I had been offered this TV show, VIP Vilma in Person. It was a Sunday show and Sunday was the only day I could spend with my family but I had to sacrifice my day with them because that weekly show provided us with maintenance money. Unfortunately, my marriage suffered because of that. At that time, Edu wasn’t active in the movies yet; he was working in an office and, of course, his schedules and my schedules were in conflict. I think he suffered some kind of culture shock. Oh, he tried to be understanding but imagine him coming home at seven o’clock in the evening and me coming home at four o’clock in the morning. That won’t work – but I had to work.” She says

she didn’t feel guilty about the marriage breaking up. ‘Definitely not. If that was bound to happen to our life, what could I do? Even if I had just stayed at home, our marriage would have suffered, because of all my debts. And what would have happened to us without any money?” She knows the importance of money because she grew up in security and has learned that insecurity is being without money. ‘I wasn’t born poor but I wasn’t born rich either. I had a comfortable childhood. I went to a private school, St. Mary’s Academy, and I had a new pair of shoes whenever the school year opened. We could buy what we liked and though our house wasn’t very big it was a cozy home.” Her father was in the government service and she had an uncle, Maurie Agra, who was a cameraman for Sampaguita Pictures.

It was this uncle who got her to audition for Sampaguita when she was only nine years old. ‘Whenever he came to the house I’d sing and dance for him. I loved to watch TV and listen to radio dramas and at school I was always on the programs. Once, my uncle watched me imitating Pilita Corrales, a white sheet all over me for evening gown, and he asked would I be interested in going into showbiz and I said I’d just love to become an artista.” The role she was called to Sampaguita to test for was as Rita Gomez’s daughter in Anak, ang Iyong Ina, but on the same day Sampaguita was testing about a hundred other children for the role of Trudis Liit, a komiks character. The little Vilma kept wandering into that larger group where, as her mother kept telling her, she didn’t belong. But here was Doc Perez himself, head of Sampaguita, beckoning to the child. ‘Mama says I don’t belong there,”said the little Vilma. ‘But I want you,” said Doc Perez. Ang Mama consenting, Vilma took the test for Trudis Liit: speaking a line or two of dialogue, crying out when hit by Bella Flores, even ad-libbing already. ‘And I was chosen to play Trudis Liit! So, my first time in movies, I was into two movies right away: Trudis Liit and Anak, ang Iyong Ina. And I got the Tessie Agana treatment: chicken and apples every lunch. Sampaguita was very nice to me. I was its baby.”

And she was its No. 1 fan, gaping to see Gloria Romero passing by and chasing after Amalia Fuentes for her autograph. ‘Ate Nena snubbed me. She just said: ‘Later!’ But I loved her and we’re very close now.” Vilma the child star was in a string of movies playing the daughter of Lolita Rodriguez or Luis Gonzales or Dolphy. And she was also in the TV soap opera Larawan ng Pag-ibig with Rosita Noble, Willie Sotelo and Eva Darren. That six o’clock p.m. tearjerker rose to No. 1 in the ratings. Meanwhile, what was happening to Vilma the growing girl? ‘What was happening was a lot of school absences and a lot of special exams. The Sisters at St. Mary’s were very understanding: if I had too many absences, they gave me special exams. But when I was in fourth year high school I was practically not attending classes any more because that was the height of the Nora-Vilma competition. What was done, with the permission of the Bureau of Education, was that I had a tutor during shootings and then I was given the test for the last grading period. Thanks to God, I passed it and I got my high school diploma. But there could be no thought of going on to college.” She had by then graduated from child star to teenage superstar.

‘Despite showbiz, I was able to enjoy my childhood. It was my teens that suffered. Those were the days of jam sessions (no discos yet) and I missed them. I was dying to attend but I couldn’t. I was too busy promoting my love team with Bobot Mortiz. So I didn’t have the chance to be a teenager. But when I reached my 20s that was when I experienced iyong being a woman: going out on dates, candlelight dinners, enjoying life. I enjoyed my 20s.” During her teens she was mostly a song-and-dance girl on the screen, but after seeing The Miracle Worker she dreamed of tackling roles like the one done by Patty Duke in that film.  However, she felt her true line was dancing: ‘Definitely not singing; I sing just for the sake of my fans.” Doing pop teen movies by the score, would she ever have a chance to act like Patty Duke in The Miracle Worker?

Loveteams were then the wheels of teenage superstardom. Vilma and Edgar Mortiz were a prize pair of wheels. The Nora-Tirso tandem formed the rival pair of wheels. It was an endless frenzied race. Vilma says that during her Bobot Mortiz phase she was doing multiple movies at the same time. ‘Actually Edgar didn’t start with me. He started with Nora and Tirso: they were a triangle. My loveteam then was with Jay Ilagan: we were doing Operetang Putol-Putol on the radio and going out on personal appearances for the fans. Jay was still slim then, very good-looking. Bobot was already chubby but not as fat as he would become later: he was guapo and moreno. Tirso was truly the mestizo type. Nora was even shorter than me though I think she’s older by a year; she was very thin then, with long hair. It’s our complexion that’s usually compared: she is kayumanggi and they say I am fair. Edgar dropped out from their triangle when it was noted that the public preferred Nora to be paired with Tirso. And Jay Ilagan dropped out when I was paired with Edgar. So when we all went on TV, on rival programs, it was the loveteam of Bobot and me versus the loveteam of Guy and Pip. That was in 1967.”

Inevitably, Bobot Mortiz came to share more than the spotlight with Vilma. ‘He was my first boyfriend, though ours was no more than puppy love. He’s a nice guy, very intelligent. In fact, I suspect that the ideas in Going Bananas are mostly his. No, we never talked marriage. We were a team for about five years. Then I did movies solo.” More serious was her next love affair, with Ronnie Henares, son of the famed news columnist. ‘I met Ronnie on TV, when he was guesting on shows with Jojit Paredes. He started courting me – this was in the early ‘70s – and our relationship had the blessings of our families. His family and mine became very close. We planned to marry but I felt I was not ready yet: I was still too concentrated on my career – though at the time the movies I was doing were merely pang-masa, nonsense musical like Lets’ Do the Salsa. I was not yet very conscious of artistic cinema: I wanted my movies to be for the boxoffice, Ronnie was the kind of boyfriend who gifts you not with rings or flowers but with books. I never went to college but Ronnie was a good equivalent: I learned a lot from him. He corrected my English, improved my pronunciation, and introduced me to new words, all through the use of cue cards that he made for me and made me read aloud to him. He gave me books to read and helped me understand them by explaining their meaning. Our relationship lasted a year and a half. We had our lover’s quarrels and the sweet thing is that even during our breaks our families stayed close. And Ronnie and I are still friends today. He composed a song for me.”

Tantamount to the Erap episode in Nora’s life is Vilma’s moment of appasionata with Romeo Vasquez, an older man with a past. ‘Romeo Vasquez was a turning point in my personal life. I really gambled with my life when I fell in love with him. He had come back to the country after being away for years. He was already separated from Amalia. Then I met him and we were offered a movie to do together: Nag-aapoy na Damdamin, for the Santiagos. The time we were together he was okay. We also did Dalawang Pugad, Isang Ibon, and Pulot-gata. And the movie that had him and me together with Nora nad Tirso: Pinagbuklod ng Pag-ibig. Our relationship lasted two years. Even after we parted, we still did a movie together.”

Vilma dismisses as mere chismis the rumor that Ronnie Poe became wildly enamored of her after they did Batya’t Palupalo and Bato sa Buhangin. But local cinema legend has the King coming to blows with Romeo Vasquez because of this jealous rivalry. Even the scene of the duel is specified: the lawns of a Joseph Estrada abode, during an Erap birthday party. An amused Vilma, however, shakes her head in denial. ‘Fernando Poe and I became close but we did not have any relationship. I’ll admit I was very impressed by him when we made our movies together. Totoong humanga ako sa kanya. He knows how to ‘carry’ people, how to deal with them in such a way as to command their respect. He is really the King. We became very very close: he’d send me food, like a dish of fish, during shootings. But that was all.”

While recovering from Romeo Vasquez, Vilma became a disco habitue, and in these excursions to the haunts of night people she often bumped into a young man who thus became a nodding acquaintance: someone she knew by face long before she knew him by name. One movie she did during this period was Yakapin Mo Ako, Lalaking Matapang, with Lito Lapid, which was shot in Cebu City. And as usual at night she went disco-hopping. And one night, at one disco, there he was again, this young man who had become a nodding acquaintance: Edu Manzano. ‘That was the first time we had a chance to talk. He’s really a charming guy and very handsome. We danced, we chatted, we danced – gano’n. Then I went back to my hotel.” She was getting ready for bed when the phone rang: Mr. Edu Manzano calling. ‘But how did you get my number?” ‘You know me, I’m resourceful. When do you go back to Manila?” ‘Tomorrow,” said Vilma. ‘What time is your flight?” ‘Two o’clock. What time is your flight?” ‘Three o’clock,” said Edu. ‘Bon voyage. And good night.” Next day, loaded with the mandatory hojaldres and rosquillos, she boarded the afternoon plane for Manila. And who should be sitting across the aisle from her but Mr. Manzano. Well! He really was resourceful. But they couldn’t converse. She was sitting beside Lito Lapid; Edu was sitting beside an Iranian. Only upon landing could they snatch a moment of exchange. Of course he wanted to know if he could date her.  “Can I invite you out or do you have a boyfriend?” “No.” “No, I can’t take you out?” “No, I don’t have a boyfriend.”

But a week passed; two weeks; a whole month – and no word from Edu. He’s not taking me seriously, shrugged Vilma. ‘Ako naman, at that time,” she says now, ‘I wasn’t taking him seriously either.” Then one night, at the Alibi Bar, she saw him again. But she was with a date with whom she went nightclub-hopping until four in the morning. When she came back to her hotel, there was a note from Edu: he was waiting in the lobby. She went down to see him, and he invited her to breakfast. What a terrific topping for the night before and her morning after. ‘So we stepped out again and had breakfast at the Manila Hotel. We talked and talked until daylight. Then he brought me back to my hotel. And that was how it started. After that, we were seeing each other every day.” During the Grand Passion that was Romeo Vasquez, her critics had hooted that she was Vilma the mad girl. But La Belle, La Perfectly swell, Romance with Edu Manzano was the real coming-out party for Vilma the Glad Girl. Miss twinkletoes had met the boy next door. Of the men in her life, Vilma Santos says it was Edu Manzano who had the most stunning style of courtship. He didn’t treat her like the superstar, the love goddess, the sex symbol, the glamour queen that she was; he treated her as if she was an ordinary kanto girl.‘ He didn’t take me to dine at five-star hotels; we ate at small pizza houses. We didn’t go dancing at elegant ballrooms; he took me to little discos. It was completely the opposite of how I had been treated by other suitors: kabaligtaran ng lahat. And how I loved it! Once, early in our relationship, he invited me to lunch. I assumed we would be going to a luxury bistro and so I dressed to the teeth. But he arrived on a motorcycle, wearing Levi’s and rubber shoes. When he saw me in all my finery, he flipped. He told me to go back up and change. So I change to jeans and rubbers. And off we sped on his motorcycle, me behind clinging to him.” Naturally, all those who spotted her – bus passengers, street vendors, pedestrians on the sidewalks – could hardly believe their eyes. ‘Si Vilma! Si Vilma!” they cried in amazement. And there indeed was the superstar, the love goddess, the sex symbol, the glamour queen, in jeans and rubber shoes, riding bumper on a motorcycle.  Vilma says it was as if she had moved into another world. ‘I really enjoyed it: riding on his motorcycle, walking in the rain. And then, after three months, he asked me to marry him. This was in 1980.” She was about to leave for the United States, to shoot a movie. She said to him: ‘Let’s give ourselves time, let’s test each other. This movie will take two months to do over there. If after two months we still feel this way, then we are really meant for each other. And we’ll get married. But not now, not right now when I’m going away.”

The decision was to make no decision yet. And Vilma left for California. She really was testing herself, for the stateside movie she was doing was with Romeo Vasquez. Had she really and truly got over him? Was she really and truly in love with Edu? The answer hit her like a bolt from the blue when Edu Manzano suddenly showed up on location and she felt, not annoyed, but enraptured, though he had broken their agreement to stay apart for two months. That he had so impulsively followed her bespoke ardor on his part. She did wonder if her producer, Atty. Espiridion Laxa, had anything to do with the surprise. But: ‘Definitely, it pleased me!” The news that lover boy Edu had leapt across the Pacific to join his lady love had Philippine moviedom ga-ga with the thought of how bigger a blockbuster than a Vilma-Romeo movie would be a Vilma-Edu picture.

The Vilmanians, as her fans are tagged when arrayed against la Aunor’s Noranians, were clamoring for a view of their glamour queen’s consort. Vilma, ever astute as businesswoman, was only too glad to deliver. ‘But before making that movie, we got married in the States.” Actually, it was an elopement. ‘My Mama didn’t know about it. Edu and I simply ran away. We got wedded in Las Vegas and we honeymooned in Disneyland and at Knottsberry Farm. Two weeks we were in hiding. Then we went back to Los Angeles. And that was when we broke the news to Mama. She cried. Oh, my Mama is good: sobrang bait nga. She was never a stage mother – except in the matter of singing, which she was always pushing me into. ‘Go ahead, sing,’ she would tell me, even if I didn’t want to. Maybe I used to be too dependent on her, as in the time of VS Films, when her goodness was being abused and when I learned about that it was too late.  One thing about my marriage; there were never any differences between Mama and Edu.”

In Los Angeles Vilma really worked at housekeeping. ‘Edu and I made a home for ourselves, just for the two of us. And I was a real housewife. I made the beds, I swept the floor, I did the cooking, or tried to. But in the States you can buy everything ready to cook. I had to be housewife because Edu is conservative and I had to be the kind of wife he wants for a wife. He called me Babes, I called him Doods.” She says that as a husband Edu was ‘mabait’. ‘He had already done a movie, Alaga, but was not yet well known. I promised him that on returning home I would lie low as movie star and just attend to being housewife. Unfortunately, on arriving in Manila, I found I was pregnant: Lucky is a honeymoon baby. At the same time I learned I had a six-million -peso debt. I told Edu about it and he said he would find some way we could work it out. But there was really not much he could do about so huge a debt. So, after giving birth to my son, I returned to work. Of course, that meant I had little time for my husband and my baby. There was a yaya to take care of the baby and as much as possible I tried to mother him but of course I couldn’t give him one hundred percent attention. Edu wanted me to be home at least by ten o’clock in the evening but it was oftener four o’clock in the morning before I could rush home.” With her feeling so exhausted and him feeling so neglected, impatience could not but become their ambiance during their four years of marriage.‘ 

In fairness to Edu, he did try to understand the situation. And he did care for me. But I simply couldn’t give up my career until I had paid off my debts. I only finished paying in 1987. And by that time Edu had left.” Possibly, for Edu Manzano, the real cruz of the marriage was having to suffer being Mr. Vilma Santos. But she says that theirs was a very loving parting. ‘We had a beautiful talk, the two of us. We agreed that our love was still there but, because we kept clashing, we shouldn’t wait until we started hating each other. We should give ourselves time to breathe and to think, apart from each other. That was already our fifth separation; the first, second, third and fourth had all ended within two months. I was expecting the fifth to end just as quickly but when it had lasted eight months already I wondered if we had not indeed gone our separate ways. Kanya-kanyang buhay na. Then I learned he had a girlfriend. He was first.” If she had hoped for a happy ending to their fifth separation it was for the sake of their son. ‘ Before Edu and I parted, we stepped out, the three of us: Lucky was then four years old. And we explained to him what was happening. We felt it was better to be honest with the child: when he grew up he would understand. He himself would not be affected: Edu and I assured him that both of us would take care that he was not affected. He is nine years old now and his name is Louis Philippe Manzano. He weighed 7.7 pounds when he was born on April 21 – and 21 is a multiple of 7. That’s why we call him Lucky.”

Vilma says she felt bad when she heard that Edu was running around with another girl. ‘I said to myself: ‘My God, why should I go on suffering like this: I’ll only grow old.’ I decided I’d like to run around too, enjoy myself. So I went out but I chose a safe place: King Kong, a club frequented by movie people, owned by Marilou Diaz-Abaya. That was the first time I had stepped out since the separation and that was the first time I met Ralph Recto. He’s a nice young man, very intelligent, very down to earh. He has a degree in economics and is taking his masters now, at the UP. I learn a lot from him, my substitute for college, like Ronnie Henares. He is very interested in politics but I don’t meddle in his politics. Our relationship is now on its sixth year. When we met, Lucky was only four and now he is nine. Lucky and Ralph are very close. No, we don’t talk marriage.” The decade since her marriage has seen Vilma developing, as Ishmael Bernal says, into an artist. Vilma smiles to recall that she started out just wanting to dance. What’s singular about Vilma’s career is that, as a child star, she went through no awkward age, and now, as superstar, she seems to have been set no deadline.

The nine-year-old who starred in Trudis Liit had a steady four years of playing little daughter of Lolita Rodriguez and Marlene Dauden but never suffered an ugly-duckling phase of no-longer-a-child and not-yet-a-teener. The difficult 13-14-15 period was smoothly bridged by roles like that of Imee Marcos in Iginuhit ng Tadhana and Pinagbuklod ng Langit. And right afterwards she became the teen queen in the pop entertainments she did with Bobot Mortiz. Then at 19 she began to veer towards heavy drama. ‘I was 19 when I made a film with Eddie Rodriguez, playing a girl falling in love with an older married man. The wife was Barbara Perez. If I remember right, that was the first time I wore a bikini.” Nary a hitch in the Vilma career; no pauses in the action as she grows up from child to girl, or from sweet young thing to red-hot mama. Or from innocuous movies to daring films. ‘Compared to my teenage partners, Eddie Rodriguez was far and away the leading man, the actor, the gentleman. Very different in manner, in the way he moved, the way he carried his clothes. He helped me refine my acting and little by little I learned poise.”

The decisive divergence is Burlesk Queen. ‘I took a risk playing Burlesk Queen, Celso Ad. Castillo directing. I was 24. My American manager, William Leary, had persuaded me to accept the role. He had been my manager since he convinced me to do a record, Sixteen, that made good. I was no longer with Sampaguita but I went back there from time to time to make sweet sweet movies or musicals. That was my style. Then I did Burlesk Queen. It turned out to be a turning point. I won an acting award. Suddenly I was the drama queen. Celso Ad. Castillo is really good. In a way it was that film that made me a real actress. It changed my sweet image. And it made good at the boxoffice. ”However, later relations with Castillo proved to be painful. ‘I already had my production company, VS Films, and I got him as director for Pagputi ng Uwak. He really gave me a hard time on that film: it was two years in the making! And it sank VS Films into debt. Celso and I had a fight. As a director he’s very good but as an artist he has his quirks: merong sumpong. I hear he now works in Malaysia: sayang, he was good for Philippine movies. Pagputi ng Uwak nearly ruined me, financially and mentally, but it turned out to be a firstrate film and it won a lot of awards, it won VS Films a lot of prestige. But I still prefer Burlesk Queen.” The five productions of VS Films, which included Rosas sa Putikan, directed by Maning Borlaza, and Halik sa Paa, Halik sa Kamay, costarring Vilma with Eddie Rodriguez, all made money, including Pagputi ng Uwak. Nevertheless, by the time she had to shut it down, VS Films had her drowning in six million pesos’ worth of red ink. It took her some seven years to pay off that montrous debt. And it meant having to go back to making movies that were ‘pambata at pangmasa” movies like Darna and Dyesebel and Wonder Vi.

Still, this ‘comeback’ period (after the birth of Lucky) was also the start of a series of vintage pictures, beginning with Relasyon, where she played a free soul living in with her lover. The lover was played by her most compatible co-star, Christopher de Leon. ‘Christopher, of all my leading men, is the one I’m most comfortable with. We really make a team. And yet we never had any relationship, except on the screen.  Just how comfortable I am with him can be seen in the fact that it’s with him I have made the biggest number of movies: around 18 or 20. There was a year when we made four movies together! So often did we play opposite each other that we felt we had to vary the situations, to avoid becoming monotonous. We’d say: Let’s sit down and think of a new situation in which to find ourselves. But there came a time when we simply could no longer think of anything new for us to play. We seemed to have exhausted all the possible love angles. And that’s when we decided to stop teaming up for a while. I went on to trying other leading men. Actually it’s not I who choose my leading men but the producers. I just accept whoever they pick for me.” A kind of homage is paid her when she’s paired with younger stars like Eric Quizon and Aga Muhlach.

‘Definitely, I feel flattered. But then I feel very very secure in my age and with myself. It’s a matter of self-confidence, of knowing that when they look at you they see a woman, period. Age doesn’t matter: I have no insecurities about it.” She knows she can look as young as, or younger than, her new leading men – as long as she herself feels young inside. Her effect on the folk around her has been most graphically expressed by, of all people, director Lino Brocka, who directed her in three of her most applauded vehicles: Rubia Servios, Adultery and Hahamakin Lahat. ‘When you work with Vilma,” says Brocka, ‘you get this feeling of having just emerged from a bath and of being drenched all over with Johnson’s baby cologne. You feel so fresh, so youthful.” He adds that when they first worked together she seemed scared of him. Now he gushes: ‘Ang sarap niyang katrabaho.” The chief reason, of course, is: ‘She has matured and grown up as an actress. At this point of her career, she is very good, she is really big. Before, she had a hard time making herself cry, but now how fast she can do it. And she has become sensitive to direction: in that repect she has overtaken Nora.” Brocka says that the sensitivity he noticed at once in Nora Aunor was what he missed when he started directing Vilma. ‘So I assumed that, as an actress, she was really just second to Nora. But Vilma takes good care of herself not only physically – there’s always this aura about her – but intellectually too: so she grows and develops tremendously. The second time I worked with her, in Adultery, I realized she had become as good as Nora, or better. And by the time of Hahamakin Lahat there was the complete sensibility already – a difference in the way she expressed pain and hurt. Talent was welling out like spring water, and flowing from her most naturally, no longer courtesy of Vicks or whatever.”

What would explain this outburst of talent? ‘Possibly her coming of age as a woman. She had become more sure of herself. And this self-confidence grew as her private life became calmer, as she found herself with fewer problems, both financially and emotionally. How a director would feel about her at the moment is that he can do anything with her now. She has become so supple that his tendency would be to challenge her still further, make her come up still higher, open up more doors. She can give you so much more now.” Brocka snorts at the complaint Vilma is currently making: that so utterly has she done all the roles she can do there’s no new role left for her to do. ‘She can do the same role over and over again as long as, with the right direction, she does it always a bit more profoundly than the last time and makes it a bit more complex than the last time. She should have no problem at all with roles. In fact, I would advise her now to play roles that are not glamorous. Yes, she’s too associated with glamour to do that. But maybe in another year or two she can afford to take off her make up and act her age. Then she’ll really be on par with Nora, whose chief concern is seldom her looks. With Nora, it’s not her face that’s on sale. The problem with Vilma is that she feels she has to live up to her image as The Glamour Girl. I’m waiting for the day when glamour will have no truck -walang pakialam! – with the acting.

Bemusing how up to now Vilma continues to be bracketed together with Nora, so that to speak of Vilma is to speak of Nora. They have been rivals, opponents, antagonists for so long that it’s impossible to tell their careers apart. Spur to each other from the start, they have realized they need each other as goad and goal, the achievement of one goading the other to an equal, or greater, achievement. Vilma-Nora is the back-to-back monster of Pinoy showbiz. Vilma sees it as sibling rivalry. ‘If Vilma is there, Nora is there. There was a point in our career [note that Vilma uses the collective singular] when we were both so affected that the rivalry became a personal feud between us. There was even a point in our career when we were fighting each other – for honors, for awards, for acting prizes. But there also came a point in our career when we realized we were not getting any younger and we started becoming very close. I think that was the time her father died and I went to the wake. We hadn’t been together since we did a movie together when we were feuding hotly: no talking to each other during the shooting; she stayed on one side with her fans, and I stayed on the other side with my fans: no communication. But when I attended her father’s wake, that was when we realized we could be friends. And we started helping each other: she’d invite me to guest on her TV show, and vice-versa. Then her mother died and again I went to the wake. And that was the time when Nora and I became so close we were telling each other the most intimate details of our life.”

And the details range from ledger to boudoir. ‘Today Nora and I are still competing but it’s a friendly competition now; in fact, I’m the godmother of her adopted child. We want that there should still be a competing between us, but with nothing personal to it. So it has become a healthy competition. Nora is a very sensitive person. Me, I’m not very sensitive. But make no mistake about Nora: she is also a strong woman. What I know of Nora: though there may be many advising her, ultimately it’s her own feelings she follows. She does what she wants to do; it’s herself she obeys: that’s her attitude. I guess what she needs at present is the right person. Nora is 37 years old now. I am 36 – a true friend who loves her. A friend who will love her whether she’s down, whether she’s up, or whatever.”

What puzzles is the difference in image between Nora la Dolorosa and Vilma the Glad Girl despite the fact that actually both of them underwent very similar experiences: rash infatuations, career ups-and-downs, a failed marriage, business fiascos, the heavy cross of huge debts. Why did such ordeals produce the sad look in one but a glad look in the other? To be sure, there are those who say that Vilma’s image as the Glad Girl is just that: an image; and that the reality behind it may not be quite as pleasant. The real Vilma, aver these know-it-all’s, is cold-blooded: sweet na sweet pero deadly; nothing matters to her but her career. She was playing herself ruthless in films like Hahamakin Lahat. When she found she couldn’t displace Nora as the nation’s sweetheart, she did violence to her own persona by enacting Burlesk Queen, the kind of role Nora cannot do: she risked her career because that was the only way to beat Nora. Vilma herself shrugs off such misreadings of her history with the remark that the intrigues of others only help her become ‘a stronger woman.” Even the world’s malice can’t be made useful in building up character. ‘I am Rosa Vilma Santos, who grew up in Bambang, Trozo, and then in La Loma, and my life is an open book. What people say about me – that’s a problem I must live with. I guess it’s the price I pay for my career: the price of no privacy. I can’t do anything about that anymore. However I may want to keep my personal life private, it’s impossible: lalabas at lalabas talaga. However discreet I may try to be, I’m sure to be found out.” So she chooses to let it all hang out. ‘Of course, I hate having no privacy: I’m really suffering from that. Sometimes I wish I were an ordinary person so I can go where I like, go shopping for groceries with my son, go for a walk and enjoy it. But how can you enjoy it when you’re always getting mobbed? But, as I said, that’s the price you pay.” And certainly she has no intention of retiring just to gain that precious privacy. ‘Nor no plans either of getting married. Not yet. maybe someday, yes. As of now, I’m very comfortable and happy with my personal life. But another marriage? I’m not prepared for that.” 

What she’s prepared for right now is more career. ‘I have reached a position when I’m not contented with just acting: I’d like to experience all the other works of moviemaking. But most of all I want to be a director. I want to be given a chance to direct a movie. So that this time I myself will be the captain. I have ideas I want to try out.” She confounds the Cassandras by expressing hope and confidence in the Philippine cinema. ‘There has been progress, there has been improvement. We started in black-and-white: now we’re in color. Yes, there are frustrations. It’s frustrating to come up with a film of relevance, to upgrade the cinema in general, and see it fail at the box-office. A painful experience – like my movie Sister Stella L. I felt bad when it didn’t make good because I like that movie very much. It wasn’t my first time to do a quality movie that had to be yanked out in seven days. You can’t blame the producers: it’s their money at stake. If I were in their place, would I risk my money on something that won’t sell? And yet how I wish there were some producers willing to risk their money on movies with significance… I hear even the scriptwriters are feeling frustrated because, when they do a quality script, they only see it changed into something with lots of shrieking and slapping. But those are the movies that sell.” Nevertheless, she looks forward to a classier tomorrow for Philippine cinema.

‘And what’s tomorrow for Vilma Santos? I’m trying to be more stable because I know that show business is not stable. I’m planning to produce a movie next year. This time I’ll manage production myself. I’ve already started with telemovies. The first was Lamat sa Kristal, with Richard Gomez. Next was Katuparan, directed by Marilou Diaz-Abaya. And the third is this one I’m doing right now with Aga Muhlach, Once There Was a Love, directed by Maryo J. delos Reyes.” Her own TV show just celebrated its 10th anniversary – and with a scandal yet. It got kicked out of its usual venue, the Metropolitan Theater, because, complained the Met honchos, Vilma’s live audiences wrought havoc with the Met’s upholstery. Which, to take the Pollyanna, or Glad girl, approach, proves that Vilma’s audiences today are not matrons and seniors but still the young, the wild, the reb. She says she has no hang ups about age. But how does she keep herself looking young? ‘I don’t know. I don’t do anything special. I used to swim but I don’t have the time now. I don’t cut down on anything. I drink occasionally but I’m not really a drinker. My true enemy is tobacco:

I smoke. Aside from that, I know no other vices. On facing the camera, whether movie or TV, I put on make up. But Vilma Santos the person, when in her house, puts nothing on her face.” She is positive it’s not make-up that makes her go over on the little or big screen as young-looking. ‘But like the old beauties of Sampaguita Studios. I know that someday I will be the ex-superstar. When that time arrives, I hope I’ll be stable – financially stable enough to ensure a future for my son, present comfort for my family, and for myself a personal life that’s tranquil because I have a stable business and a comfortable income. Those are my dreams now that I am 36.” Not that she has any complaints about the present tense. ‘More than half of my life has been spent in show business,” says the Glad Girl. ‘For all the blessings I am enjoying, I should be thankful!” Happiness, Inc.

Publisher’s Note:  Quijano de Manila (Nick Joaquin) is a National Artist for Literature, while both Ishmael Bernal and Lino Brocka are National Artist for Film.  Our cover story is about the indestructible and unfading screen beauty, Vilma Santos, who has become even more accomplished and seductive as the years pass. Quijano de Manila (Nick Joaquin in journalistic disguise) captures the secrets and the charms of this enduring beauty, a triumph of art over time. – Juan P. Dayang

Source: Written by Quijano De Manila (Nick Joaquin), Philippine Graphic Magazine 05 November 1990

VERY LONG RIVALRY

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Vilma Santos’ triumph as Best Actress – for Mano Po 3 (My Love) – at the Metro Manila Film Festival in December 2004 parallels her greatest rival Nora Aunor’s similar feat at the Manila Film Festival last June, where Nora won for Naglalayag. So it goes without saying Nora and Vilma will once again be major contenders for the top acting honors in this year’s awards season. Nora, for the Maryo J. delos Reyes opus in which she portrayed a lady judge who fell in love with a man half her age; while Vilma, for Joel Lamangan’s romance-drama about a Chinese anti-crime crusader torn between her family and a past love. Nora versus Vilma. Their acting duel is never ending. All these years, their fight for the Best Actress plum in practically all the local award-giving bodies has been much anticipated since.

1972 – 1975

1972 – At the Quezon City Film Festival, then held every October, Nora’s entry was Sampaguita Pictures’ And God Smiled At Me (directed by Tony Cayado and Danny Holmsen); while Vilma’s banner vehicle was Tagalog Ilang-Ilang Productions’ Dama de Noche (directed by Emmanuel H. Borlaza). And the winner was Nora! May die-hard Vilmanian kaming kaklase sa elementary, ang sabi: ‘Luto ‘yun, dahil malapit si Nora kay QC Mayor Norberto Amoranto!” Such loose talks were never confirmed to be true. Or as Tempo’s veteran movie columnist Ronald K. Constantino avers, ‘Nora never figured in any awards scam!”

1973 – Sa annual Filipino Academy of Movie Arts and Sciences (FAMAS) Awards Night, it was the Vilmanians’ turn to rejoice. Vi was ad-judged Best Actress for Dama de Noche, ka-tie ni Boots Anson-Roa (for JE Productions’ Augusto Buenaventura megger Tatay Na Si Erap). Nora wasn’t nominated for her award-winning starrer at the QC filmfest, but for The Gift of Love kung saan siya gumanap ng dual role: bilang isang cancer-stricken patient at ang kakambal na eventually ay napunta kay Tirso Cruz III. Dama de Noche, which paired Vi with Edgar Mortiz, also had her doing two parts: a baliw and a sane sister.

1974 – 1975

In the succeeding years, nagkatunggali sina Nora at Vilma, mainly for box-office supremacy. May point na parehong box-office hit ang mga pelikula nina Nora (her own NV Productions’ Banaue) at Vilma (Nakakahiya? for Virgo Films), at nagkalaban sila for Best Actress sa Bacolod City Film Festival in 1975. Si Vilma ang nanalo para sa dinirek ni Eddie Rodriguez (a.k.a. Luis Enriquez), but Nora’s entry – helmed by Gerry de Leon – won as Best Picture. In 1974, Nora did a major dramatic trilogy for Premiere Productions: Fe, Esperanza, Caridad, which was handled by Cirio Santiago, Lamberto V. Avellana and Gerry de Leon. (Avellana and de Leon were to be honored as National Artists for Film in the years to come.) Nora won a FAMAS Best Actress nomination for Fe, Esperanza, Caridad; tulad sa ibang pelikula na nagpamalas siya ng potential bilang mahusay na aktres early on, such as George Rowe’s Paruparong Itim in 1973. Nora, as a deaf-mute blind woman, was beaten by Gloria Sevilla (for Gimingaw Ako, a Visayan movie). Ang notable performances ni Vilma Santos that time were in TIIP films: Biktima and Karugtong Ang Kahapon (by Borlaza), na entries sa MFF in 1974 and the 1st Metro Manila Film Festival in September 1975.

a 1st MMFF, Nora’s entry, NV Productions’ Batu-Bato sa Langit (directed by Luciano B. Carlos), was a blockbuster and won as 3rd Best Picture. Kapwa na-hone ang acting potentials nina Guy at Vi (sa tulong din ng kanilang TV drama anthologies – Ang Makulay na Daigdig ni Norang RPN 9 at Dulambuhay ni Rosa Vilma ng BBC 2 – pero sige pa rin ang paggawa nila ng mga pelikulang komersyal dahil sila ang mga reyna ng takilya noon.

1976 -1977

Nagkakalaban pa rin sina Nora at Vilma sa FAMAS, pero kapwa sila talunan. Especially Vilma, who didn’t win another FAMAS Best Actress trophy until 1982 (with Elwood Perez’s 1981 megger Pakawalan Mo Ako). In 1976, Nora Aunor’s “landmark performance ” in Mario O’Hara’s Tatlong Taong Walang Diyos won nods from the FAMAS voters as well as from the Gawad Urian critic-jurors bilang Best Actress. Hindi si Vilma ang naging mahigpit na kalaban ni Nora, kundi si Hilda Koronel (for Lino Brocka’s Insiang). Sa MMFF in December 1976, si Hilda ang Best Actress, but Nora’s performance in Lupita Kashiwahara’s Minsa’y Isang Gamugamo was equally acclaimed by the critics. (Minsa’y…won as FAMAS Best Picture in 1977.) It was the first year of the Gawad Urian (organized by film critics collectively known as the Manunuri ng Pelikulang Pilipino), at si Nora ang nag-buena-mano as Best Actress. Henceforth, hindi na lamang ang FAMAS ang kinilalang tagapagbigay-parangal sa industriya ng pelikulang lokal. Sa mga sumunod na taon, dumami ang award-giving body sa movie industry. Bukod dito, ang mga filmfest sa iba’t ibang siyudad outside Metro Manila; like in Davao City, where Nora Aunor once won as Best Actress for Tito Sanchez’s Ibilanggo si Neneng Magtanggol.

In 1977, it was apparent that the actress in Vilma Santos fully emerged when she won the MMFF Best Actress award for the controversial Celso Ad Castillo period drama Burlesk Queen. Unfortunately, her winning was marred by nasty talks (na kesyo binawi ang mga napanalunan ng pelikula, including Vi’s trophy or medallion.) It seems nakaapekto ‘yun sa awarding na pambuong taon: at the FAMAS, Vilma lost to Susan Roces (for Maligno, also by Castillo); and, at the Gawad Urian, to Daria Ramirez (for Eddie Romero’s Sino ’ng Kapiling, Sino’ng Kasiping?). As for Nora Aunor, matapos ang grand entrance niya sa big league bilang major award-winning actress (with a double victory, unmatched at the time), isang actionromance- drama ang kanyang nagging panlaban: Augusto Buenaventura’s Bakya Mo Neneng, which paired her off with Tirso Cruz III and Joseph Estrada. The film won as Best Picture sa FAMAS. Nora’s and Vilma’s starrers were big moneymakers at the 1977 MMFF.

1978, Sa dinami-dami ng natamong karangalan nina Vilma Santos at Nora Aunor, interesting point of discussion pa rin among their followers ang nangyaring acting duel nila in the 1978 MMFF. Vilma was handled for the first time by Lino Brocka in Rubia Servios, produced by Sampaguita-VP Pictures. Vi enacted a rape victim na naghiganti sa kanyang rapist (Phillip Salvador) at napawalang-sala. On the other hand, Nora had Eddie Garcia for her director in Atsay, a serious look on housemaids, as written by the award-winning Edgardo M. Reyes and lensed by ace cinematographer Romeo Vitug. Sa MMFF that year, walang ibang acting category na mapapagwagian maliban sa Best Performer award, na si Nora ang nagwagi. “The triumph of restrained acting!” ayon sa sumunod na ulat matapos ang Gabi ng Parangal. All the while, perhaps almost everyone thought it would be Vilma Santos who’d get the award, dahil si Brocka na ang director niya. May talk show (the late Inday Badiday’s Would You Believe?) na sadyang iniangat ang pag-asa at pag-asam ni Vi na siya ang mananalo. At the awards night, papasok pa lang daw si Vi sa CCP Main Theater (venue ng rites), nilapitan agad siya ni Marichu “Manay Ichu” Perez-Maceda (her producer, na kabilang sa MMFF committee) and whispered: “I’m sorry, Vi, it’s not for you …” Nag-stay si Vi hanggang matapos ang ceremonies; nakipalakpak siya when her rival was declared winner. Katabi niya sa upuan si Christopher de Leon (Garrotte: Jai Alai King), who also lost. Ayon sa grapevine, naglasing si Vilma sa tindi ng siphayo. “Ang sakit, Manay!” Vi reportedly told Ichu, who also produced many of Nora’s earlier movies which made millions of pesos. In the Gawad Urian and FAMAS, naparangalan naman si Vilma, bilang producer ng Pagputi ng Uwak, Pag-Itim ng Tagak which won as Best Picture. That year, mayroong pinagsamahang movie since Nora at Vilma, TIIP’s Ikaw Ay Akin na dinirek ni Ishmael Bernal, for which they were both Best Actress nominees at the Urian, but lost to Beth Bautista (for Danny Zialcita’s Hindi sa Iyo ang Mundo, Babyb Porcuna). Sa FAMAS, hindi rin para kina Vi (Pagputi) at Nora (Atsay) ang Best Actress statuette, kundi kay Susan Roces (for Brocka’s gothic drama Gumising Ka … Maruja!). Fair enough?

1979 – 81

In 1979, 1980 and 1981, kapwa maningning ang mga pangalan nina Nora Aunor at Vilma Santos bilang box-office stars at awardwinning actresses. Pero hindi kahigpitan ang labanan nila sa iba’t ibang parangal. May panahong nananalo si Nora na ibang aktres ang mahigpit na kalaban; ganu’n din si Vilma. Nang ma-handle si Nora ni Brocka (in 1979’s Ina Ka ng Anak Mo, produced by Premiere Productions and written by Jose Dalisay Jr.), she was pitted with the formidable Lolita Rodriguez and it was to Nora’s credit na pumantay siya sa parangal – bilang MMFF Best Actress.

Sa 1979 FAMAS, Nora bested Lolita, who, with her performance in Brocka’s Tinimbang Ka Ngunit Kulang, beat Aunor in 1974. Ang “katapat” ng Nora-Lolita duo ay ang acting tandem nina Vilma Santos at Charito Solis in Bancom Audiovision’s Modelong Tanso, directed by Cirio Santiago. Sa 1979 Gawad Urian, it was neither Nora nor Lolita as Best Actress; the award instead went to Charito Solis for Brocka’s Ina, Kapatid, Anak.

In 1980, tatlong pelikula ni Nora Aunor ang maituturing na panlaban: two by Brocka (Nakaw na Pag-ibig and Bona) and the other by Laurice Guillen, Lea Productions’ Kung Ako’y Iiwan Mo. She won the Gawad Urian for Bona. Ang panlaban ni Vilma was Zialcita’s Langis at Tubig. Hindi taon ni Vilma ang 1980, which saw the emergence of other young and talented actresses like Gina Alajar (Brutal), naka-tie ni Nora sa Urian, and Amy Austria, na tumalo kay Aunor sa Metro Manila Film Festival. In the 1980 MMFF, Amy won with a lone entry – Brutal – while Nora got nominated for Bona and Kung Ako’y Iiwan Mo. (A case of split votes.) Sa 1980 Gawad Urian, nominated sina Nora, Gina (eventual winners) at Amy, samantalang si Vilma was “snubbed by the critics.” In 1981, nanalong MMFF Best Actress si Vilma for Zialcita’s Karma, besting Nora’s multi-character portrayal in Maryo J. delos Reyes’ musical-drama Rock ‘N Roll. Vi, however, failed to win any other nomination for that starrer, while Nora went on to win a trophy (Catholic Mass Media Awards) and Best Actress nomination (Gawad Urian) for Mario O’Hara’s Bakit Bughaw ang Langit?

1982, Nauso ang so-called Grand Slam Best Actress in 1983, nang manalo si Vilma Santos for Ishmael Bernal’s Relasyon. That 1982 film was a small, low-budget drama of a husband and his mistress. Nag-hit ang tandem nina Vi at Christopher de Leon, starting in 1978, with Sampaguita Pictures’ Masarap … Masakit ang Umibig and Nakawin Natin ang Bawat Sandali (both by Elwood Perez), after their first pair-up in Celso Ad Castillo’s 1975 romance-drama Tag-Ulan sa Tag-Araw. For Relasyon, Vilma won as Best Actress sa CMMA, Gawad Urian, FAMAS and the debuting Film Academy of the Philippines (FAP) Awards. Maging sa “minor” parangal, like the TV show Let’s Talk Movies ng RPN 9 (hosted by Armida Siguion Reyna, Behn Cervantes and Mario Bautista), si Vilma rin ang Best Actress for the Regal Films drama. With Nora Aunor as Vilma’s main competitor, it was an interesting, but utterly disappointing, acting duel. Sa FAMAS, Nora got nominated for Romy Suzara’s Mga Uod at Rosas – and lost. Sa ibang award-giving bodies, isang malaking pelikula at pagganap ni Nora – sa Himala, as the visionary Elsa – ang natalo kay Vilma. The Ishmael Bernal opus was produced by the Marcos government-established Experimental Cinema of the Philippines (ECP). Some were of the opinion na may bahagi ng pulitika sa pagkatalo ni Nora; marami raw sa movie industry ang anti-administration, kabilang ang sympathizers ng Free the Artists Movement na anti-censors. May malaking rally noon na hindi dinaluhan ni Nora, samantalang nakiisa sa protesta si Vilma. Gayon man, may parangal na natamo si Nora para sa Himala: the 1982 MMFF Best Actress, where it won 9 out of 13 awards, including Best Direction and Best Picture. Naging opening Film ang Himala sa 1983 Manila International Film Festival – organized by then First Lady Imelda Romualdez-Marcos – at inilahok sa Berlin International Film Festival in February 1983. Ayon kay Bernal, Nora lost in Berlin to a Russian actress by a mere vote. Sa 7th Gawad Urian in 1983, nominated in almost all major and minor categories ang Himala but never won a single award. Ilang taon ang lumipas, sa tuwing titingnan ko ang Honor Roll ng Manunuri sa ipinamamahaging souvenir program, sadyang “walang Himala” na nagtamo ng parangal. But in 2002, sa 25th year ng Gawad Urian, kabilang ang Himala sa Pinakamahuhusay (Best Films of the past three decades) na naparangalan, with Nora Aunor personally receiving the overdue award para sa isang totoong klasikong pelikulang Pilipino. At bigla ngang naghimala ang Himala!

1983, Noong 1983 at 1984, nagkalaban uli sina Vilma at Nora, with Vi getting an edge. Bernal’s Broken Marriage won Vi her second Urian trophy, while Nora didn’t get a nomination (“Nora Out,” ayon sa introduction ng Highspeed column ni Ronald K. Constantino tungkol sa pagkaka-release ng Urian nominees for that year.) May drama starrer si Nora in 1983: Maryo J. delos Reyes’ Minsan, May Isang Ina, for which she got nominated sa FAMAS, where Charito Solis (Don’t Cry for Me, Papa) won and got elevated sa Hall of Fame. Taong 1983 nang makamit ni Nora Aunor ang TOWNS (The Outstanding Women in the Nation’s Service) award for her contributions in media arts. Hindi man siya naka-Grand Slam as Best Actress, ang parangal ay natatangi at ipinagkakaloob hanggang ngayon sa outstanding women achievers in different socio-civic fields. Hindi dito natapos ang Nora-Vilma rivalry. Pero ang pagsasama ng dalawang aktres sa isang pelikula was not repeated after Danny Zialcita’s T-Bird at Ako (released in 1982). Their initial appearance together was in 1970’s Young Love; naulit in 1978, sa Ikaw Ay Akin ni Bernal; at mayroon silang tig-isang episode sa Dugo at Pag-Ibig sa Kapirasong Lupa in 1975 at Pinagbuklod ng Pag-Ibig, also released in early 1978.

At the height of the Nora-Vilma rivalry for acting supremacy, ang kanilang mga pelikula, magkahiwalay man sila o magkasama, ang may malaking kinikita for their producers. In 1982 and 1983, Vilma was Box-Office Queen and Urian Best Actress; while Nora did several blockbusters (like Beloved and Till We Meet Again). There was social unrest, following the Ninoy Aquino assassination on Aug. 21, 1983, pero masigla ang daigdig ng TV at pelikula. Sikat pa rin sina Nora at Vilma.

1984 – 85

In 1984, Nora and Vilma each had three “pang-award” movies. Nora starred in ‘Merika by Gil Portes, Condemned and Bulaklak ng City Jail by Mario O’Hara. The latter was entry in the MMFF, winning Best Picture and Direction at nanalo ring Best Actress si Guy. Si Vilma was in Brocka’s Adultery: Aida Macaraeg, Mike de Leon’s Sister Stella L. and Marilou Diaz-Abaya’s Alyas Baby Tsina. Noong 1985 unang nagbigay ng Star Awards ang Philippine Movie Press Club (PMPC). Para sa taong 1984 ang mga parangal na ipapamahagi, at sina Nora at Vilma lang ang nominated for Best Actress: Guy for all her three starrers, Vilma for Aida Macaraeg and Sister Stella L. Mainitan umano ang nagging deliberation para sa kategoryang Best Actress, which earlier that year was bagged by Vilma (for Sister Stella L. sa Gawad Urian; her third straight win!) and by Nora (for Bulaklak ng City Jail sa CMMA). Sa 1st Star Awards for Movies, it was Nora Aunor who won for ‘Merika. The late movie scribe Frank Mallo, a self-confessed Noranian, fought hard for Aunor to clinch the Best Actress plum, especially for ‘Merika. He even wrote a letter (published in Constantino’s Highspeed column) disputing the Manunuri’s earlier choice of Vilma Santos as Urian Best Actress. Sa taong ito rin ng Gawad Urian nagtamo ng double nomination si Nora – for ‘Merika and Bulaklak ng City Jail. Sa pagtatapos ng award-giving season, si Nora uli ang Best Actress sa FAMAS (her third win) for Bulaklak ng City Jail. Dito niya unang naka-tie si Sharon Cuneta (for Borlaza’s Dapat Ka Bang Mahalin?). Pero hanggang ngayon, nakahihinayang na walang napanalunang award si Nora for Condemned, kung saan she was cited by Tempo entertainment editor Nestor Cuartero for that single scene in which she acted out a “cry of sorrow like no other” upon the death of actor Dan Alvaro who played her brother in that film which was rated “A” by the Film Ratings Board.

1986-88

Sa mga taong 1986, 1987 and 1988, walang mainitang tunggalian sa acting sina Nora at Vilma. It was the period following the EDSA Revolution in February 1986. Nanamlay ang movie career ni Nora, na noon ay regular na naghu-host ng long-running Superstar show sa RPN 9. Manaka-naka’y she had hit movie – I Love You, Mama/Papa and Sana Mahalin Mo Ako in 1986 and 1988, respectively – and produced Halimaw (dinirek nina Mario O’Hara at Christopher de Leon), na Best Picture sa 1986 Metro Manila Film Festival. Papasikat noon ang mga anak niyang sina Lotlot, Ian Kristoffer, at ang child wonder na si Matet de Leon. Si Vilma ay mas pinalad kesa kay Nora sa awards in 1987 (Best Actress, for Maryo J. delos Reyes’ Tagos Ng Dugo, sa Catholic Mass Media Awards at sa FAMAS). Twenty-fifth anniversary sa showbiz ni Vi that year, at may grand celebration siya sa Vilma! With Nora Aunor as one of her special guests. In 1987, Vilma starred in Viva Films’ Saan Nagtatago ang Pag-ibig? (penned by Armando Lao, megged by Eddie Garcia). The komiks melodrama won a string of Best Picture awards (Star, FAMAS, FAP) sa taon na hindi nagbigay-parangal ang mga Manunuri ng Pelikulang Pilipino (Gawad Urian) sa alinmang kategorya “for lack of deserving winners.” In contrast, hindi markado ang performance ni Nora in the 1987 Mario O’Hara megger Tatlong Ina, Isang Anak, another vehicle for Matet, which pitted Guy against Gina Alajar and Celeste Legaspi.

In 1988, Nora did a guest role in Takot Ako, Eh! (topbilling her popular kids) and produced under her NCV Films outfit the ill-fated Greatest Performance (co-starring her were Tirso Cruz III and Julio Diaz), which was rejected by the executive committee of the 1988 MMFF. Nora then would have debuted as movie director, but unfortunately her Greatest Performance never got shown.

1989, A series of unfortunate events seemed to hound Nora’s career up to this point. October 1, 1989 was to be the last airing date of the 22-year-old musical-variety show Superstar on RPN 9. A month later, it was revived on IBC 13 with a new title, The Legend … Superstar, but this was short-lived lasting only up to early 1990. Naging mas masuwerte si Vilma Santos sa hinu-host na Vilma! on GMA 7, which started in 1981 as VIP (Vilma in Person) ng lumang BBC 2 (naibalik sa Lopez owners ang ABS-CBN after the EDSA Revolution). Nagbida si Vilma sa isa sa mga pinakaimportanteng pelikula ng Dekada ‘80: Regal Films’ Pahiram Ng Isang Umaga (by Ishmael Bernal), na sinimulan in 1988 at ipinalabas in early 1989.

In December 1989, Vilma headlined a period romance-drama (Viva Films’ Imortal, megged by Eddie Garcia) at nanalo sila ng kaparehang si Christopher de Leon ng acting plums sa MMFF. Sa awardings for that year, si Vilma ang nanalong Best Actress sa Star Awards (for Pahiram), her first form the Philippine Movie Press Club. ‘Kumpletung-kumpleto na ang career ko!” nasabi ni Vilma as she accepted her trophy. Later, it was Nora’s turn to get a Best Actress trophy for the first time from the Film Academy of the Philippines, for Elwood Perez’s three-year-in-the-making Bilangin Ang Bituin Sa Langit. ‘Kumpletung-kumpleto na ang career ko!” sabi rin niya in her acceptance speech.

Na-elevate si Vilma sa FAMAS Hall of Fame, for having bagged five Best Actress statuettes: Dama de Noche, Pakawalan Mo Ako, Relasyon, Tagos ng Dugo, and Elwood Perez’s Ibulong Mo Sa Diyos. Nora won her fourth Best Actress plum sa FAMAS, also for Bilangin. Walang itulak-kabigin sa dalawa, kaya marapat lang na mag-tie sila for Best Actress, as in the 1990 Gawad Urian, na ‘pantay na parangal ”ang ipinagkaloob ng Manunuri kina Nora (for Bilangin Ang Bituin Sa Langit) at Vilma (for Pahiram Ng Isang Umaga).

1990, Dalawang malalaking pelikula ang tinampukan ni Vilma: Lino Brocka’s Hahamakin Lahat and Laurice Guillen’s Kapag Langit ang Humatol. Si Nora ay nakahabol sa MMFF with the low-budget social-realist drama Andrea, Paano Ba Ang Maging Isang Ina?, which she co-produced with an independent outfit, MRN Films, and was directed by Gil Portes based on a Ricardo Lee screenplay. Sa mga parangal para sa taong ito, si Nora Aunor ang nagwaging Best Actress sa ‘Movie Magazine” awards (ng GMA 7), Star Awards, FAMAS, FAP at Gawad Urian, making her a Grand Slam honoree. On May 22, 1991, Brocka’s sudden death in a vehiclar accident shocked the movie industry. Nora dedicated her FAP Best Actress award kay Brocka, na siyang dahilan upang maitanghal ang Bona sa Directors Fortnight ng Cannes Film Festival in 1981. May nagsasabing ‘hindi Grand Slam” ang pananalo ni Guy for Andrea dahil, sa CMMA, her costar Gina Alajar was declared Best Actress (with Nora as runner-up). But the CMMA was considered a minor award-giving body, at ‘yung apat na major ang ginagawang batayan for a Grand Slam win. Kaugnay rito, nagsimulang magbigay ng parangal ang UP-Young Critics Circle (YCC-Film Desk) at si Nora ang lone winner for Best Performance, also for Andrea. Hindi na nagbigay ng acting awards ang CMMA the following year, habang aktibo hanggang ngayon ang five major award-giving bodies, na nadagdagan ng iba’t ibang grupo. Nagkaloob ng Gawad Pandekada ang Manunuri – for achievements in acting – at sina Nora, Vilma, Vic Silayan, Phillip Salvador at Gina Alajar ang mga nagging karapat-dapat sa parangal (Nora having won Urian Best Actress trophies for Tatlong Taong Walang Diyos, Bona, Bilangin Ang Bituin Sa Langit and Andrea; Vilma for Relasyon, Broken Marriage, Sister Stella L. and Pahiram ng Isang Umaga).

1991 – 92

Exciting uli ang labanang Vilma at Nora, para sa masusugid nilang tagahanga, noong 1991. Viva Films’ Ipagpatawad Mo starring Vilma Santos and Christopher de Leon was chosen as 1991 Gawad Urian Best Picture, with Vilma winning as Best Actress. Muli, nagproduce si Nora ng low-budget drama for MRN Films, Elwood Perez’s Ang Totoong Buhay ni Pacita M., na entry sa 1991 Metro Manila Film Festival. Its awards included Best Picture, Best Direction, and Best Actress for Nora Aunor.

In the award-giving season in early 1992, Nora won the Best Actress honors sa Star Awards and FAP, as well as the Best Performance award from the YCC-Film Desk’s 2nd Annual Circle Citations (with co-winner, Aga Muhlach, for Maryo J. delos Reyes’ Joeyboy Munti). Ang Pacita M. ay nanalo rin ng Best Picture and Best Direction among other awards as 1991 FAMAS. Nora scored three consecutive Best Actress triumphs sa FAP Awards: 1989 (Bilangin), 1990 (Andrea) and 1991 (Pacita M.). Ito bale ang katapat ng three straight victories ni Vilma sa Gawad Urian. Nora was elevated sa FAMAS Hall of Fame in 1991 for having copped five Best Actress statuettes: Tatlong Taong Walang Diyos, Ina Ka Ng Anak Mo, Bulaklak Ng City Jail, Bilangin Ang Bituin Sa Langit and Andrea, Paano Ba Ang Maging Isang Ina? Later, nagtamo siya ng Circle of Excellence awards sa FAMAS apara sa mahusay niyang pagganap sa Pacita M. in 1991 at sa The Flor Contemplacion Story in 1995.

To mark her 25th anniversary in show business, Nora starred in PETA’s Minsa’y Isang Gamugamo sa una niyang pagganap sa entablado. The play, an adaptation of Lupita Kashiwahara’s film based on a screenplay by Marina Feleo-Gonzales, was directed by Soxy Topacio mula sa script nina Ricky Lee at Boni Ilagan. It had a successful run at the Tanghalang Raja Sulayman in Fort Santiago in February-March 1991. Nora further acquitted herself in theater in December 1992 (DH by Topacio-Lee) and in the mid-1990s (Trojan Women, na dinirek ng isang Griyego and was staged at the Ninoy Aquino Parks and Wildlife). At tulad ng mga stage play na tinampukan, nagging malaking tagumpay ang unang major concert ni Nora (Handog ni Guy) sa Araneta Coliseum noong May 18, 1991.

1993, Hindi nagtapos ang labanang Nora-Vilma for Best Actress sa pagkaka-elevate nila sa FAMAS Hall of Fame. Dahil sa dumaming award-giving body since the mid-1980s, hindi nakuntento ang respective groups of fans nina Nora at Vilma sa pag-asam na patuloy silang gumawa ng magagandang pelikula na pagtatamuhan nila ng trophies. Sadly, dumating din sila sa punto ng kasalatan, careerwise.

In 1992, wala ni isang pelikulang tinampukan si Nora, samantalang si Vilma starred in only one: Maryo J. delos Reyes’ Sinungaling Mong Puso, na hindi niya pinagtamuhan ng anumang major Best Actress award. In 1993, gumawa si Vilma ng pelikula na ang kuwento’y base sa unang Pilipinang nag-reveal ng pagkakaroon niya ng AIDS (Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome), si Dolzura Cortez. Directed by Laurice Guillen for Octoarts Films, Dahil Mahal Kita (The Dolzura Cortez Story) won Vilma the Best Actress honors at the 1993 Manila Film Festival, Star, Gawad Urian and FAP. Si Nora ay gumawa ng Inay for Melanie Marquez’s MM Productions, by veteran megman Artemio Marquez (may-likha ng maraming box-office hit ni

Guy sa Tower Productions in the early 1970s). Natalo si Nora sa MMFF at ibang major awardings ng taon, but she won the Best Performance award, again from the UP-Young Critics Circle (YCC-Film Desk’s 4th Annual Circle Citations), with Aga Muhlach (for Jose Javier Reyes’ Hindi Kita Malilimutan) as co-winner.

1994, Mula 1994 hanggang 2003 ay hindi na nagkatunggali sa Best Actress award sina Nora at Vilma. Early 1994 nang huling magkasabay as contenders for the acting plum sina Nora (Inay) at Vilma (Dahil Mahal Kita). For the whole year, Nora didn’t topbill any movie. She hosted Modern Romance sa Telebisyon on GMA 7 and the monthly special Superstar Beyond Time on RPN 9, and appeared on several telesines and a successful two-night concert at the Mandarin Hotel Ballroom. Naulit ang pangyayari noong 1992 na walang pelikula si Nora (she only appeared in her second stage play, DH, na nag-world-tour in 1993) and this will be repeated 10 years later, when she did the ABS-CBN 2 drama series Bituin that aired from September 2002 to May 2003 and several concerts. Vilma notched two films: Regal’s Nag-iisang Bituin (by Joey Reyes) and Golden Lions’ Lipa Massacre (by Carlo J. Caparas), which won as Best Picture sa FAMAS.

1995 – 97

Sa mga sumunod an taon, parehong nag-achieve sina Nora at Vilma in local award-giving groups and international film festivals. Nauna si Nora, in 1995, for The Flor Contemplacion Story, kuwento ng Pilipina na nasentensiyahang mamatay by hanging sa Singapore. Late 1995 nang maiulat na si Nora ang nagwaging Best Actress sa Cairo International Film Festival sa Egypt for her performance in the Joel Lamangan megger, which also won as Best Picture. Nanalo si Nora sa YCC-Film Desk’s 6th Annual Circle Citations (Best Performer) at sa Star Awards, FAP at Gawad Urian (Pinakamahusay na Pagganap – Pangunahing Aktres; with co-winner Helen Gamboa for Tikoy Aguiluz’s Bagong Bayani, another Flor Contemplacion filmbio). Top box-office hit ang The Flor Contemplacion Story, for which the Guillermo Mendoza Memorial Scholarship Foundation, Inc. (GMMSFI) chose Nora as Box-Office Queen, the same honor she received in the early 1970s and 1980s. Si Nora ang Best Actress sa 1995 MMFF for Viva Films’ Muling Umawit ang Puso. Sa international filmfests, Nora again won as Best Actress in 1997. She got the Golden Pearl Award in Penang, Malaysia, for Viva’s Bakit May Kahapon Pa? Para sa naturang Lamangan megger, Best Actress din sa Gawad Urian si Nora (with cowinner Sharon Cuneta, for Olive Lamasan’s Madrasta).

1998 – 2001

Ang international fame, bilang Best Actress, ay nakamit ni Vilma in 1999, when her Star Cinema headliner Bata … Bata … Paano Ka Ginawa? – directed by Chito Rono – was entered as competition entry sa Brussels Film Festival. Released in 1998, Bata won for Vilma the Best Actress honors at the Star Awards, FAP and Gawad Urian, as well as the Best Performance award from the YCC-Film Desk. Dahil nahalal na alkalde ng Lipa City sa Batangas si Vilma Santos-Recto (she married then Batangas Congressman, now Senator Rafael ‘Ralph” Recto in December 1992), naging mas madalang ang paggawa niya ng pelikula. Pero hindi pa rin magmimintis si Vilma na manalo ng acting trophy, kapag din lang may panlabang pelikula, as in 2000 when she did Star Cineman’s Anak by Rory Quintos. Nanalo siyang Best Actress sa Star Awards.

2002, Vilma failed to win as Best Actress sa 2002 MMFF para sa major film na Dekada ‘70, megged by Chito Rono and produced by Star Cinema. Hindi naman nabigo ang Vilmanians sa mga sumunod na awarding, in early 2003, dahil kay Vilma napunta ang Best Actress trophies na kaloob ng Star Awards, FAP at Gawad Urian. Pati ng minor award-giving body na binubuo ng mga academician, ang PASADO (Pampelikulang Samahan ng mga Dalubguro). At ang kanyang ikalawang Best Performance award mula sa YCC-Film Desk in its annual Circle Citations. Panlaban ng bansa ang The Seventies (Dekada ‘70) sa 4th Makati CineManila International Film Festival (organized by Direk Tikoy Aguiluz). The film won a special jury prize at Best Actress award for Vilma (her second claim to international fame). In contrast, malaon nang walang pelikulang panlaban si Nora at this point. After Bakit My Kahapon Pa? In 1996, Nora did minor starrers: MAQ Productions ‘Mama, Dito sa Aking Puso, screenwriter Frank Rivera’s directorial debut; and Lupita Kashiwahara’s megger under Premiere Productions, Babae, an entry to the 1997 MMFF, for which Aunor got several acting nominations. Her last major performance was in Seven Stars Productions’ Sidhi, released in February 1999. Walang napanalunang trophy si Nora for her fourth Lamangan starrer, which was also panned by Manunuri ng Pelikulang Pilipino member Lito B. Zulueta. Both Nora and Vilma, however, were recipients of the Gawad Pan-Dekada (along with Richard Gomez) at the Urian rites in March 2001. Silang dalawa pa rin ang mga aktres na napagkalooban ng natatanging pagkilala ng Manunuri, para sa tigtatlong parangal na natamo nila – in the 1990s – sa kategoryang Pinakamahusay na Pagganap. Aunor won for Andrea, Paano Ba Ang Maging Isang Ina?, The Flor Contemplacion Story, and Bakit May Kahapon Pa?. Santos won for Ipagpatawad Mo, Dahil Mahal Kita and Bata … Bata … Paano Ka Ginawa?

2004, Kung susumahin, mahirap nang dagliang mabilang ang mga award nina Nora at Vilma, through the years, para sa mga pelikulang tinampukan nila. Ito rin ang puntong hindi ang pag-quantify sa mga natamong parangal ang mahalaga, kundi ang pagpapatunay na walang mintis sa kanya-kanyang laban, sa kahusayan, ang dalawang pinakamahigpit na magkaribal sa larangan ng pagganap pampelikula. The End. – William Reyes

NOTE: After their last acting contest (Naglalayag vs Mano Po 3 My Love), the two actresses went separate ways, Vilma decided to do mainstream commercial films widening her demographics (D’ Lucky Ones, cameo role, 2006; In My Life, 2009; The Healing, 2012) and Nora did several indie-art films (Care Home, 2006; Ingrata, 2006; El Presidente, 2012; and Sinapupunan – Thy Womb, 2012).

Boxing Matches 1/7

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

An eye for an eye. Is that biblical? For Vilmanians and Noranians seeing mano de mano is like a historical task. Point by point everyone will fight. Awards to awards, acting to acting, talent to talent. If Nora has three consecutive FAP, Vilma has three consecutive URIAN. If Nora sings, Vilma dance…and so on… for Vilma and Nora’s fans the comparison never ends with statistics. It’s the experiences. Like being part of a boxing matches.

For many Nora Aunor fans, Ate Guy is a picture of a conservative, traditional, restrained- trained artist (just like Lolita Rodriguez). For them, Nora is the ultimate performer. For many Vilma Santos fans, Ate Vi is picture of a liberal, feminist, method-trained artist (just like Charito Solis). For them, Vilma is the ultimate performer. Can we find some solution to figure out who is the ultimate winner that is if this is a boxing match? How many rounds before we can proclaim a winner? What are the boxing rules that we should follow? And what is the reward? Perhaps the title, the best actress of all time? For Vilmanians, the clear winner is Vilma Santos. No doubt. Vilma remained to be an important player in the entertainment industry. Projects lined-up, waiting for her availability. She also stacked up so many honors from getting a doctorate degree to a prestigious Gawad Plaridel to the latest title of “woman of style and substance.” She is indeed the clear winner. For Noranians, being abroad have its disadvantages. Nora continued her controversial stay in the United States with the issues regarding the discovery of her past marriage records in Las Vegas. This was in addition to her completion of the drug rehabilitation program imposed to her in exchange of the dropping of drug possession charge against her. Noranians admitted that her career is currently in downside despite the two digital films she has completed in the past year. So career wise, Vilma Santos remained on top of her game while clearly Nora Aunor’s fame diminished as she retired in foreign country. We have clear winner then but what is the point of this article? Well, let us bring the past and reminisces the once competitive bout of the two hottest actress Philippine cinema ever produced, Vilma Santos and Nora Aunor.

We listed Vilma’s ten best films and matched it with Nora’s. We then came up with analogy of who did well in terms of credible performances. We also tried to switch the roles and see if both actress remained credible. The outcome was incredible.

Nelia & Josie

Atsay versus Anak – Mario Bautista pointed out in his movie review of “Atsay” (Philippine Daily Express, 1978) that Nora Aunor’s performance: “…bears the distinct marks of style and self, welding character and personality. As Nelia, the atsay, she delivers a muted performance that successfully treads the thin, delicate line separating genuine sentiment and mawkishness.”

In 1978, you will not imagine Vilma Santos plays an “Atsay” which could also be said to Nora Aunor, her fans will not imagine Nora played a burlesk dancer or spoiled socialite. After 22 years, fans of Nora Aunor were surprised to find out Vilma Santos played the typical role that’s been identified to Nora. That is the role of an “atsay” or maid or in modern day term, domestic helper of “DH” in short.

And surprise, surprise, Mario Bautista, the same critic who praised Nora’s performance in Atsay was equally convinced of the Vilma’s performance in Anak. And he wrote: “…(Anak) belongs to Vilma, who goes through an entire spectrum of varied emotions as Josie, mula sa katuwaan at excitement niya sa pagbabalik sa Pilipinas (natural na natural ‘yung pagiging aligaga niya habang namamahagi ng pasalubong sa mga anak niya), ang disappointment niya nang matanto niyang hindi na niya kilala ang mga batang binalikan niya, hanggang sa finally ay sumambulat siya sa tagpong pinagsasampal na rin niya si Claudine at pinalalayas. It’s a bravura sequence and the performance is magnificent.”

Atsay was shown in the 1978 Metro Manila Film Festival. The film was a mild hit despite Nora Aunor being proclaimed as the best performer defeating Vilma’s Rubia Servios. Nora didn’t win any awards for Atsay after the controversial wins over Vilma. Anak on the other hand was 2000’s box office record holder. The film also earned Vilma best actress awards from PMPC’s Star Awards and Pasado awards.

Switcheroo – If we switched roles, Vilma Santos would look awkward if she played the role of Nelia in Atsay in 1978. That is not because she was incapable of doing so but because of her youthful look. But what about Nora playing Josie Agbisit in 2000’s Anak? We are sure that Nora will also excel as Josie but would the film be a box office hit? I doubt it.

Reality Checks – Vilma convincingly did a typical Nora Aunor roles in Anak. She proves that she is indeed the most versatile actress we have right now. And that there’s no role that she can’t do justice. Nora can excel acting wise if she did Anak but we are convinced she can’t replicate the box office results that Vilma can do. This is in consideration of the dismal box office results Nora’s past four films prior to year 2000.

Corazon & Chato

Bulesk Queen versus Minsa’y Isang Gamo-Gamo – Both Vilma and Nora did a career milestone films in 1976 and 1977.

Nora Aunor as Cora De La Cruz in Minsa’y Isang Gamo Gamo delivered her famous legendary line: “My brother is Not a Pig!” Nicanor G. Tiongson, one of Aunor’s original drumbeaters wrote in The Philippines Daily Express in 1976 wrote: “Once again, Nora Aunor proves herself to be one of the finest actresses today, with an acting style that is both “raw” and “fine” characterized by a disarming sincerity and force, that can break into an unbelievable number of nuances, shades and colors of emotion. Outstanding is her court scene where her face registers a gamut of emotions — from anger to confusion to depression and despair — in the pace of ten seconds. Like a mature actress, she does not attack dramatic scenes with histrionics or hysteria. Over her brother’s coffin, she curses the Americans who came to pay her family off by screaming “My brother is not a pig” over and over again with mounting intensity.” Despite the praise for Nora’s wonderful performance by many critics, she didn’t win any award for this role.

The following year, it was Vilma Santos turned. As Chato, Vilma Santos gave us one of the most compelling performance of her long stellar career in Burlesk Queen. Ricardo Lee, the writer, interviewed the director Celso Ad Castillo in an article for the Manila Magazine in 1977. Castillo pointed out that all Vilma’s highlights scenes were take one. Her scenes in the hospital with Leopoldo were shot continuously and that Vilma was so good that even Leopoldo can’t controlled his tears. And Leopoldo was supposed to be dead in this scene. Vilma convincingly won the judges’ vote as she won the film festival’s best actress award as Burlesk was entered in the 1977 Metro Manila Film Festival. The film won 10 out of 13 awards that created huge complaints from the other films entered. Burlesk never replicate it’s achievements from the festival jurors as the film was ignored by the other award giving bodies. The sole consolation by Burlesk’s supporter was the box office results of the film. It became the top grosser of the festival.

If Nora produced one of her most memorable lines in 1976 via Minsa’y Isang Gamo-gamo, Vilma on the other hand, created one of the most graphic scenes in the history of Philippine cinema, that’s the ending scene of her Burlesk Queen where she danced away until she bleeds (intended to be an abortion attempt) to her unfortunate demised.

Switcheroo – If we switched roles, will Nora and Vilma give us the milestone performances we witnessed? Will Vilma Santos played more intensely as a nurse in a rural area near the military bases in Pampangga than Nora in Minsan Isang Gamo-gamo? She will indeed be more like Kapangpangan because of her fair complexion. A well-known Kapangpangan physical traits. Given the fact that prior to Burlesk Queen the most serious roles she has done was Castillo’s Tag-ulan Sa Tag-araw and Bernal’s Nag-aapoy na Damdamin, Vilma would definitely do well as Cora De Cruz. The question now is would Nora be physically ready to play the demand of the role of Chato in Burlesk Queen? Acting wise, she would be as intense as Vilma but the role would probably not fit her physically. If the role were given to Nora would she be willing to do the strip tease dances. Would she be willing to show some skin. Despite the fact that the role is not as vulgar as what might the title implied, Burlesk Queen would be too daring for Nora’s image and she would have no guts to play such role.

Reality Checks – Vilma will convincingly play the Kapangpangan Cora De La Cruz. By 1976, Vilma was riped to play an important role and if she did Minsa’y Isang Gamo-gamo, she will equally be convincing as Nora. Nora on the other hand, will be akward to play Chato in Burlesk Queen. The physicality of the role would also play an important factor which will result of her being out of place that is if she plays the role of Chato in Burlesk Queen.

Ester & Rubia

Rubia Servios versus Ina Ka Ng Anak Mo – 1979 produced an incredible collaboration films. Drama queens of yesteryears teamed up with the reigning queens. Vilma Santos did Modelong Tanso with Charito Solis and Nora Aunor did Ina Ka ng Anak mo with Lolita Rodriguez. We all know what the outcome of the films was. Vilma and Chato were satisfied with the box office results of their tandem while Nora and Lolita were happy with their critical results.

Ina Ka Ng Anak Mo directed by Lino Brocka was indeed the better project than Modelong Tanso. Nora once again gave us her famous three syllables line: “hayuuuuppp… Hayuuuupppp… Hayuuuupppp!” Isagani Cruz summed up her performance in his TV Times review: “…Filipino movies are nothing if they do not have confrontations and Ina Ka ng Anak Mo has one confrontation after another. The best one occurs when Aunor sees Rodriguez and the baby for the first time. Aunor silently moves from shock to hurt to rage to hysterics. The scene is spoiled only at the end, when she bursts out that she will see the pair in court; in the heat of such passion, no Filipina will think of impersonal legal proceedings. More characteristic would have been a search for a weapon or for an exit door…Brocka specializes in acting vehicles. Aunor clearly deserves the Best Actress Award. In fact, she deserves it more than Rodriguez, if only because she is younger and has less experience. Before Ina Ka Ng Anak Mo, only Charito Solis could stand up to Rodriguez; now Aunor is on par with both veteran actresses.”

A year before Nora bursted out with her now famous three syllable lines: “hayup, hayuup, hayuuup” Vilma cried out the same line with more anguish in her most demanding role as a rape victim in 1978’s Rubia Servios. Co-incidentally, both Ina Ka Ng Anak Mo and Rubia Servios were directed by Lino Brocka. The failure of Rubia to win Vilma an acting recognition at the hands of the most successful acting director, Brocka was perhaps the most disappointing anecdote in Vilma career and perhaps Brocka’s too.

Ricky Lo’s article titled “Vilma’s Violation” summed-up Vilma’s fans’ perception of her performance: “…The anguish in Vilma’s face and the lust in Philip’s eyes blended so well the effect was dramatic rather than sensual….The real climax of the film, however, is the killing of Philip by Vilma with a paddle aboard a motorboat at sea. Lino Brocka, who directs Vilma for the first time, succeeded in muffling her sobs even in the most hysterical moments…” The climax scene he mentioned here was the scene where she uttered the lines: “hayup… hayuup… hayuuup!”

Switcheroo – If we switched roles, will Vilma be convincing as the daughter of Lolita Rodriguez in Ina Ka Ng Anak Mo? Remember Vilma played Lolita’s daughter in several dramatic films in the 60s. And Vilma admitted that Lolita was one of her early influence when it comes to acting. It is fare enough to say that if Vilma can hold herself when comes to acting with the intensity of a Charito Solis she would be able to stand her ground too with the likes of Lolita Rodriguez. She has done so in her films in the 60s and she will pass with flying colors if she did Ina Ka Ng Anak Mo instead of Nora.

On the other hand, would Nora Aunor be as convincing as Vilma in Rubia Servios? Again, the roles demands physicality. Will Nora Aunor eat her guts out and performed like Vilma? As Rubia she will require to be raped by Philip Salvador twice. Would Nora be as prepared as Vilma to play an object of affection of an obsessed rapist? I doubt if she will be able to convince us with the demand of such role.

Reality Checks – Vilma will hold her ground if she will be given a chance to do Ina Ka Ng Anak Mo against the dramatic legend, Lolita Rodriguez. Considering the fact that both have worked together in several dramatic films in the 60s. Meanwhile Nora Aunor will be out of place if she plays the role of a rape victim in Rubia Servios.

 Boxing Results – Vilma 3, Nora 0  – To be continued…

RELATED READING:
Official Web-site: Vilma Santos Recto
Official Web-site: Nora Aunor ICON
Facebook: Vilma Santos Recto
Facebook: Nora Aunor
Wikipedia: Vilma Santos
Wikipedia: Nora Aunor
Superstar Nora Aunor
Star For All Seasons Vilma Santos
Nora Aunor Film Actress
Vilma Santos Film Actress
And God Smiled at Me vs. Dama de Noche
Vilma-Nora Then, Nora-Vilma Now
Will Vilma Santos do a Nora Aunor?
A Tale of Two Movie Queens
About “Larawan” and Nick Joaquin
T-Bird at Ako (1982) (Video)

Boxing Matches 7/7

We listed Vilma’s ten best films and matched it with Nora’s. We then came up with analogy of who did well in terms of credible performances. We also tried to switch the roles and see if both actress remained credible. The outcome was incredible. The final bout…

Relasyon versus Naglalayag – Two films, two performances…the last bout between Nora and Vilma. We picked two films that becomes significant milestones to both actress. Vilma Santos’ Relasyon earned her the very first of her four “grand slam” best actress wins. Nora Aunor’s Naglalayag earned her the second international recognition in addition to the local awards she already amassed. By the way, she shared the international best actress honor with Sharon Cuneta, a self confessed Vilmanian.

So lets start… In this corner, Nora Aunor for her portrayal of a rich judge in 2004 Manila Film Festival entry, Naglalayag. A May-December love story. Nora fell in love with a poor taxi driver played convincingly by Yul Servo. The film achieved the festival’s best picture honour together with the best director award for Maryo J. delos Reyes and the coveted Best Actress for Nora Aunor. The film was first offered to Vilma Santos but she turned it down and Maryo De Los Reyes decided to give the project to Vilma’s rival, Nora.  In his Inquirer article, Nestor U. Torre wrote: “THE MANILA Film Festival later this month has as one of its highlights the big-screen comeback of superstar Nora Aunor. For years now, Nora has been occasionally starring in films, but most of them haven’t done justice to her well-honed talent. They have either stressed her dated “kawawa” screen persona or put her in exceedingly overwrought scenes that were too self-consciously “dramatic.” Thus, she has failed to rise up to the level of her touchstone performances in movies like “Bona,” “Himala,” “Atsay” and “Tatlong Taong Walang Diyos.” A challenging material would uplift Nora’s sagging career according to Torre… He continued: “…This is a great pity, because we know that, despite her relative drop in popularity, Nora still has some great performances left in her. All she needs is challenging material that’s right for her unique combination of gifts. Why hasn’t she been getting such projects? Because some of her film colleagues are still fixated on her past roles, not realizing that viewers have tired of them-and that, at 50, Nora shouldn’t be expected to merely reprise her past triumphs…” Unfortunately, Torre clearly realized Aunor wasn’t believable as the rich judge…

He wrote: “…To be sure, some elements detract from Nora’s thespic achievement here. For one thing, she is not all that believable as a judge. Yes, it’s true that the similarly petite Esperanza Fabon is a judge in real life, but the problem has less to do with height than more telling background and character traits…Some scenes are acted in too overwrought a manner, especially Nora’s thespic highlight at a funeral parlor. And the lead screen couple’s romantic interludes are sometimes too cutely staged and executed for Nora’s mature character in this movie…” But despite this truthful observation Torre’s adoration to Aunor surfaced as he concluded: “…Despite these flaws, however, Nora’s performance still impresses, moves and illuminates viewers because it is generally natural, insightful and committed. Let’s hope that “Naglalayag” does well at the film fest, so other producers will offer Nora even better and more challenging screen vehicles, for her to truly reemerge as the thespic superstar she once was-and could be again.” Too bad, Torre’s enthusiasm faded as the film closed in numerous theatre on it’s third day of showing. The only significant consolation to the box office results of this film was Aunor’s shared best actress win with Sharon Cuneta at the Brussels International Film Festival. This was her third international recognitions, one award ahead of Vilma’s two.

Meanwhile… In this corner, Vilma Santos as Maria Lourdes, the sympathetic mistress in Bernal’s Relasyon. The film that earned Santos it’s deserving win at the majors – FAMAS, Gawad URIAN, Film Academy of the Phils., Catholic Mass Media Awards and from a minor – Let’s Talk Movies Awards. Santos’ wins resulted in the creation of a new tag line “Grand Slam.” Which basically means a swept wins from all major award giving bodies? The Philippines currently have five major award giving bodies – FAMAS, URIAN, STAR, Golden Screen and Luna Awards. At the Gawad Urian, Aunor was expected to win her third critic’s trophy against Gina Alajar and Lorna Tolentino from the same film, Moral and against Vilma Santos’ tiny film Relasyon. Aunor was conditioned to received the honour because of her tremendous performance as Elsa in ECP’s Himala. But she left empty handed as the critics finally resolved their unfair treatment of Vilma Santos and gave her the long awaited nod. Vilma will win all of the remaining trophies resulting from many Noranians’ speculation of political sabotage. As the film Himala was funded by the Marcos government, the intense resistance against the government resulted from the film being ignored. Never mind that Vilma gave us one of the most moving performance of her already long stellar career.

A critic, Isagani Cruz in his article for Parade magazine analyzed Relasyon’s psychological overtones: “…we have a film made explicitly for adults. There is no explicit sex sequence (adults don’t really go for that sort of thing, only adolescent boys do). But the psychological problems faced by the film are comprehensible only to adults, those who know what it means to live with someone one loves (or, at least, used to love). This film is, thus, not entertaining in the usual prurient sense, but in a deeper, psychological, intellectual sense. There are basically two themes that this film tackles: sex roles and divorce.” He pointed out two opposing views about the two lead characters of the film… Cruz added: “..Vilma Santos represents womanhood in the film: Christopher de Leon represents manhood. The Filipina woman is commonly thought of as a martyr or long-suffering masochist. Santos portrays a mistress who is an out-and-out martyr…De Leon represents chauvinist maleness. He portrays a character that is totally insensitive to his woman’s needs.” He then touches the theme of the film, the flight of a mistress and divorce… He said: “…The trouble with sex roles in our society, the film argues, is that they are widely accepted without question. Men are supposed to have mistresses, and women are supposed to be faithful. Men are supposed to make the decisions (about where to live, what job to get, when to dine out), and women are supposed merely to follow. The Philippines may justifiably boast that, in politics, women are almost as powerful as men, but it is undeniable that in every other field including the home, it is the men who are the masters and the women who are the slaves. The other theme tackled by the film is that of divorce. Again and again, the characters discuss the lack of divorce in the Philippines . If De Leon could only annul his marriage, if he could only divorce his wife, if he could only get to Las Vegas and marry Santos there… Such possibilities remain mere possibilities, because Philippine law, unfortunately, still does not allow for divorce. In the film, it is made clear that the marriage of De Leon and his wife is totally beyond repair. With De Leon , being the male chauvinist pig that he is, and with his wife, being the non-entity that she is, there is no hope for the loveless couple. On the other hand, Santos and De Leon clearly love each other, clearly deserve chance to be man and wife, clearly should be helped (not damned) by society. It is an implicit case for divorce, made even more convincing by the fact that the characters are so familiar, so realistic.” And then concluded: “…technically, the film does not rank high in Ishmael Bernal’s canon of films… There is one technical achievement worth watching for: De Leon’s death scene, covering more than one minute, is taken with one continuous shot (no cuts) Santos’ acting is adequate and extraordinary. De Leon gives another of his solid performances…” I couldn’t agree more. That scene alone won my approval. Vilma’s “tuhog” acting was so effective that by the time its over we were both exhausted and felt her pain. In the next scene, where she was consoled by her family and friends, in the kitchen table, we felt her final resolve, the acceptance of the death of her love one. The naturalness of her acting was very moving and effective.

Switcheroo – In 1982, Vilma Santos has established already her versatility as an actress. Accepting roles that her opponent have reservation of doing. Nora Aunor on the other hand maintained her chosen projects to api-apihan roles and light comedies. She did two important films in 1982, Mga Uod at Rosas where she played another “api-apihan” role and the gigantic Elsa role in Himala. Together with two light comedies, Annie Sabungera and Palenke Queen. And don’t forget her lesbian role in T-bird At Ako with Vilma. Her chosen projects didn’t change the possibility that she might be typecasted in those api-apihan roles. A big mistake considering that in order for an artist to have longevity one must accept roles that will challenge one’s ability and giving something new to your audience will add more interest resulting with continued patronage and loyalty. Vilma Santos has learned this earlier as she tried to surpassed her opponents. Versatility remained to be her greatest weapon. And so if we give the Marilou role to Aunor, would she be as convincing as Vilma? Her ability to be vulnerable was seen in such convincing performance in Mga Uod at Rosas and Himala. The role will also required her to deliver such lines with such feminist overtones. Would she be convincing delivering such kilometric lines? With such strong conviction? I doubt it. By 1982, she wasn’t known for delivering long lines but instead was known for uttering short syllabolic lines. Lines: like: “my brother is not a pig!” or “Hayup…hayup…hayup…” A proof that she will be akward as the insecure mistress in Relasyon.

Meanwhile if we give the Dorinda role to Vilma, in DeLosReyes’ Naglalayag we can honestly say that Vilma will be more successful as the rich, successful judge. She will be more convincing with delivering her lines, with every gestures and posture. She will also excelled in many dramatic highlights of the film. Adopting a more restrained acting that Vilma is now know for, those scenes that only required her to show tears dropping from her eyes just like in Mano Po 3: My Love and Dekada 70. A proof that Vilma after her long acting career has evolved into a more versatile well rounded actress.

Reality Checks – Even Nestor Torre, an ardent Aunor supporter concluded that Aunor was unconvincing as Dorinda, the rich judge in Naglalayag. Santos on the other hand earned her deserving respects from all the award giving bodies in 1982 for her effective portrayal of a mistress in Relasyon. 22 years between the two films and clearly, Vilma Santos transformed herself into a more versatile well rounded actress and Nora Aunor got stucked into an restrictive image. Those roles of the underdog, the api-apihan roles. If we switched roles, Nora Aunor would not be as effective as the mistress in Relasyon while Vilma will excel as the rich judge in Naglalayag.

Boxing Results – In our final bout, Vilma knocked out Nora by a landslide. Vilma 12, Nora 2

Conclusion

Our exercises showed one clear proof. In order for an artist to remained famous and maintained longevity, one must be willing to adapt, learned from the craft and jumped into an unfamiliar territory by accepting challenging roles. Nora Aunor have restricted herself to roles that will typecasted her into one type of roles, that of the “api-apihan” roles. Vilma on the other hand, learned from the very beginning that in order for her to survive the tough competition she have to accept challenging daring roles that will ask her to attack roles out of her comfort zone.

 “Kung hindi tayo kikilos, kalian pa? Kung hindi ngayon, kalian pa?”

“Walang himala…nasa puso…nasa tao ang himala!”

RELATED READING:
IMDB: Nora Aunor
IMDB: Vilma Santos
Official Web-site: Vilma Santos Recto
Official Web-site: Nora Aunor ICON
Facebook: Vilma Santos Recto
Facebook: Nora Aunor
Nora & Vilma No Longer a Rivalry (a special magazine)
Boxing Matches 1/7
Vilmanians and Noranians Surveyed
About “Larawan” and Nick Joaquin
Nora at Vilma sa Gitna ng Basura
Very Long Rivalry (Repost)
Sino ba talaga ang mas mahusay umarte, si Vilma o si Nora?
May be the Philippines’ best film actress of all time 1/3
Vilma-Nora Then, Nora-Vilma Now (Repost)

Boxing Matches 6/7

We listed Vilma’s ten best films and matched it with Nora’s. We then came up with analogy of who did well in terms of credible performances. We also tried to switch the roles and see if both actress remained credible. The outcome was incredible. Boxing Matches Continues with….

Andrea, Paano Ba Ang Making Isang Ina? versus Bata Bata Paano Ka Ginawa? – Both films, Andrea Paano Ba Ang Maging Isang Ina? and Bata Bata Paano Ka Ginawa? earned Nora Aunor and Vilma Santos grand slam wins. Nora Aunor won the 1990 Best Actress from the Metro Manila Film Festival and then swept the best actress honor from Urian, FAP, Star, Famas, and Young Critics Circle. Adding to the significance of this grand slam wins was her elevation the Famas Hall of Famer.  This was her fifth Famas best actress which as stupid as can be required her to be elevated and disqualified her with future wins. In addition to this wonderful honors was the film received its deserving best picture trophies from FAMAS, STAR and of course at the MMFF.

Butch Francisco wrote in his Philippine Star article: “..It is a powerful film mainly because of the performances of the cast and the basic conflict found in the movie. As Andrea, Aunor is a teacher who has chosen the difficult and perilous but crusading path of armed social rebel whose husband is a comrade in the underground. When it is time for her best friend, Gina Alajar, who is married to a guy Lloyd Samartino, who has absolutely no sympathy for the cause which his wife’s friend is fighting for. Childless, Lloyd and Gina get emotionally attached to the baby, especially after the mother temporarily leaves the infant to look into the circumstances of her guerilla husband’s death in the hands of the military. Unfortunately, before she could return to her baby, Nora is arrested and detained in a safe house by military men, who torture her mercilessly. Having lost contact with the freedom-fighter and presuming her to have been killed, the surrogate parents have decided to keep the child as their own and bring him to the United Sates for seven years. When they return to the Philippines for a visit, Nora confronts them and tries to claim her child back. “Andrea” has a most chilling, moving and harrowing climax, one of the best in local movies. Its fearless account of military abuses in both Marcos and Aquino administrations is admirable. From start to finish, it mirrors present Philippine conditions, with special focus on the problems afflicting educators and the government’s counter-insurgency campaign…The film’s cohesive material is given justice by the sterling performances of Nora Aunor and Gina Alajar, both perfectly cast.”

In 1998, Vilma’s Bata Bata Paano Ka Ginawa grossed on its opening day of showing a whooping P 5.2 million pesos. A tabloid article headlined: “Ate Vi sinagip ang naghihingalong movie industry!” A feat that she will surpassed with the another super blockbuster film, Anak the following year. A worthy note, Vilma’s closest rival, Nora Aunor on the other hand was clearly on decline mode as her followed up films after the successful Flor Contemplacion failed miserably at the box office, one film after the other.  Nestor Torre, Nora’s ardent supporter wrote down for Philippine Daily Inquirer “Vilma scores with “Bata, Bata, Paano ka Ginawa?” He elaborated: “…the film based by Lualhati Bautista on her own novel that was published in the ‘80s, Vilma Santos plays Lea Bustamante, an “ordinary” woman who turns out to be an extraordinary Filipina because she has liberated herself from the restrictions that hold some other women back from coming into their own up to this day. She separated from her husband (Ariel Rivera) because he wanted her to subsume her personal goals in his favor. She had a son (Carlo Aquino) by him, and later lived in with another cad (Albert Martinez), who fathered her daughter (Serena Dalrynple). Unhappy with Albert, Vilma fantasizes about getting it on with a third guy (Raymund Bagatsing), but he doesn’t accede to her forthright invitation for them to get between the sheets. That’s one thing with Lea that surprises and perhaps even shocks some members of the audience. Unlike some other women who keep their sexy thoughts to themselves, she articulates them in colorful language, without blushing. This forthrightness has a positive if sometimes “embarrassing” effect on her children, who have been brought up to be similarly forthright and argumentative. Lea also wears her heart on her sleeve in relation to her work, which involves her in helping aggrieved and battered women fight for their rights. Writer Lualhati Bautista and director Chito Rono’s telling and prismatic depiction of Lea’s character is worthy of praise because it is full-bodied and filled with surprises, unlike most other local film characterizations, which are two-dimensional and predictable. The audience’s hearty response to Vilma’s spirited portrayal of Lea is a big change from viewer’s knee-jerk responses to most lead characterizations on the local screen, which fail to delight and surprise because they follow tired, old formats so automatically.”

Torre praised Lualhati Bautista admirable script with…”…Bautista’s plotting is also admirable. She includes many elements from Lea’s personal and working lives and is able to integrate these diverse bits into a fairly unified whole – a tough task for any screenwriter. Lea’s first husband comes back after many years, hoping to take his son with him to the States. Lea’s live-in partner becomes jealous, and yet the two men gang up on Lea when the children are hurt in an accident. Things come to a head until the children have to choose whether to stay with their mother or join their respective father’s new families. Through all of this, Lea has her crying jags, but otherwise remains strong and secure in her self-worth. This is the all-important role model that the character of Lea holds up to the less secure women watching awe-struck in the dark movie house. Let’s hope that at least some of them learn from her example. Of course, the film would have been of greater service to its audience if it had showed why, despite her strength and wisdom, Lea still fell for the self-centered cads with whom she shared her bed.”

He then described Vilma’s performance as…”…But these weaker elements pale in comparison to the movie’s admirable strengths, led by its insightful script and direction, excellent performances by Vilma Santos and Carlo Aquino, and most significant of all, the movie’s evocation of real life being lived with courage and zest….” I can’t agree more… With this description came Vilma Santos third grand slam best actress. Even the pro-Nora Aunor group, Film Desk of the Young Critics Circle or YCC for short confirmed Vilma as their best of 1998. The year gave Vilma her seventh Gawad URIAN as well as the trophies from Star Awards, Film Academy of the Phils., Gawad Sineng-Sine PASADO Awards, Siasi, Jolo.  Critics Awards and because she already a Famas Hall of Famer she’s disqualified in their category. But her disqualification were compensated as she received their Lifetime Achievement Award.

The courageous and unconventional performance of Vilma Santos was again rewarded the following year as she won the top plum award from the Brussels International Film Festival. Armida Siguion-Reyna in her article for People’s Journal wrote: “…Congratulations to Vilma Santos for winning the Best Actress Award and to Chito Rono for the Best Director Award in the 1999 Brussels International Film Festival! Their film “Bata, Bata…Paano ka Ginawa?” (Lea’s Story) is one of the many films now touring the international film festival circuit passed during the term of the present board. Some people feel that the movie could not have been done nor would have passed uncut the MTRCB previously, because of its theme and use of language. Its principal character (played by Vilma) is a mother to two kids by two different men, now seeking solace in the company of a third.”  She pointed out…”…The victories of Vilma and Chito could not have come at a better time for the Filipino movie industry and only shows that the Filipino film artist can meet and even surpassed international standards when given the creative freedom to do so. Of course, we recognize that last year, Albert Martinez, Jun Lana and Ditsi Carolina also won awards in the same festival. I hope the do-gooders who look at the Filipino movie industry with disdain are reading!” Vilma’s Bata was also exhibited at the 44th Asia-Pacific Film Festival in Bangkok , Thailand in November of 1999. The film earned a Special Jury Award – For awareness on woman’s status in Asia-Pacific. Vilma Santos was also nominated as well as Serena Dalrymple as best supporting actress.

Switcheroo – Would Vilma Santos be as successful as Nora in Andrea? And would Nora do the unthinkable as Lea in bata? By this time, both are now matured capable actresses. The only difference was that Vilma Santos remained a bankable star. As we all know Andrea was just a mild hit, a pale in comparison with the outcome of Bata. Would Andrea be more successful at the box office if Vilma was in the lead instead of Nora, a higher feasibility is in order. Nora was already in decline in 1990, the previous year she did only one movie, the mild hit Bilangin Ang Bituin Sa Langit with Tirso Cruz III. She did three more films, all were a dismal failure until she hit a jackpot via Flor Contemplacion in 1995. After Flor her career went downhill. She never recovered even with the two trendy digital offerings. Meanwhile Vilma remained bankable. The end of the 80s gave her opportunity to do only serious films. Even mediocre films like Lipa Masacre was a major hit. The only dent in her strong box office record was the dismal bombed of her film with FPJ in 1996, Ikaw ang mahal ko. But she nicely recovered with a string of hits like Hanggang Ngayon Ika’y Minamahal, Bata Bata Paano Ka Ginawa, Anak, Dekada 70 and Mano Po 3. The question now is if Nora can do such type of role, a liberated matured Lea. Would it fit her image and would the masses like her in such role? A formidable task. Then we can also asked the same with Vilma. Would she performed as intense as Nora in Andrea?

Reality Checks – In 1990, Vilma was clearly the picture of a fine versatile actress. She can do any roles from a militant nun to a cancer stricken career woman to a sympathetic mistress. The Andrea role will add some variety in her already long history of successful roles. We can conclude that she will be successful as Andrea in Andrea Paano Ba Ang Maging Isang Ina. These scenario will even add some glitter to the box office outcome of the film reversing its dismal result under a Nora Aunor starrer. Meanwhile in 1998, Nora Aunor was already in a decline mode. After the successful box office result of the critically acclaimed Flor Contemplacion, the strings of dismal flops in the box office followed. Muling Umawit Ang Puso, Bakit May Kahapon Pa, Mama Dito Sa Aking Puso, Babae and Sidhi all laid an egg at the box office. She eventually decided to try her luck in America. Playing Lea in Bata Bata Paano Ka Ginawa would be a change from her long lists of similar typecasted roles but the outcome would be questionable as we elaborate above. The role will required her to be as liberated, contradicting her virginal, conservative image. The role will also required her to be sexually active, well impliedly and this might turned off her fans and even herself. Nora will not jumped to an unfamiliar territory.

Boxing Results – Vilma win, Nora loss again. Vilma 10, Nora 2 –  To be continued…

RELATED READING:
IMDB: Nora Aunor
IMDB: Vilma Santos
Official Web-site: Vilma Santos Recto
Official Web-site: Nora Aunor ICON
Facebook: Vilma Santos Recto
Facebook: Nora Aunor
Nora & Vilma No Longer a Rivalry (a special magazine)
Boxing Matches 1/7
Vilmanians and Noranians Surveyed
About “Larawan” and Nick Joaquin
Nora at Vilma sa Gitna ng Basura
Very Long Rivalry (Repost)
Sino ba talaga ang mas mahusay umarte, si Vilma o si Nora?
May be the Philippines’ best film actress of all time 1/3
Vilma-Nora Then, Nora-Vilma Now (Repost)

Boxing Matches 4/7

We listed Vilma’s ten best films and matched it with Nora’s. We then came up with analogy of who did well in terms of credible performances. We also tried to switch the roles and see if both actress remained credible. The outcome was incredible. Boxing Matches Continues with….

Pahiram Ng Isang Umaga versus Bona – The intention of Nora Aunor to prove that she is a fine actress continued as she produced projects that can showcase her talent under her own NV productions. And in 1980, “Bona” was conceptualized by director Lino Brocka, producer Aunor and writer Cenen Ramos. It was entered at the 1980 Metro Manila Film Festival together with another Aunor starrer, the soap operatic, Kung Ako’y Iiwan Mo surprisingly directed by Laurice Guillen. Nora’s performance in Bona assured her supporters a win as festival best actress but she left empty handed as the trophy goes to, not to her rival Vilma Santos but to Amy Austria in Marilou Diaz Abaya’s dramatic film, Brutal. The defeat didn’t discouraged her supporters particularly Brocka who brought the film to the 1981 Cannes and received numerous positive reviews.

Nestor U. Torre on his Philippines Daily Express review titled “Obsession” in 1981 described “Bona” as: “…a story of obsession, the tragedy of the fan turned fanatic. It delves into what causes an otherwise sensible girl to throw discretion and self-respect to the wind to serve her beloved.” An accurate description. Torre added: “…Clearly, Brocka, Aunor and writer Cenen Ramos know the phenomenon whereof they speak. The intimate knowledge makes for a film that rings true both for the expert in abnormal psychology and for the ga-ga movie fan reliving his dream and high nightmare in the audience… In the end, the nasty man announces that he’s leaving the country with his latest and wealthiest inamorata. Bona, who has taken all the shit he’s casually thrown her way, can take no more. She kills the bastard. In the process, she has hopefully killed her insane obsession for him. Or maybe she has also killed herself…What a story!…” Strangely enough, Torre wasn’t convinced with Aunor’s performance. He pointed out: “…the best performance in “bona” is turned in, not by Nora Aunor in the title role, but by Phillip Salvador as the bit player who is her idol, her nemesis, and her obsession. Nora is all over the place and gives the role everything she’s got…Trouble is, she is too intelligent for her part. Obsession is born of emotional weakness, a psychological vacuum that the idol is idealized into filling. As Aunor portrays her on screen, Bona is too sensible and savvy a woman to make this act of self-delusion plausible. She is also a mite too old for the role. Granted, there are “diehard-fans in their fifties and sixties, but the character of Bona, as written. Is clearly intended for a young girl (She is supposed to be still a student, for one thing). The character’s innocence would account for much of her naiveté, and Nora does manage the Naïve but, but it feels a little forced. On the other hand, the fact that he, too is no longer a spring chicken helps Salvador in his portrayal of the trying-hard bit player who is destined to be a has-been even before he has been anything at all. His age makes the character even more pathetic. Salvador has a perfect feel for the bit player’s braggadocio in public, his private fears, his dimwitted dreams and his casual cruelty. Stardom is his own obsession, and his failure to achieve it consumes him as much as her failure to possess him consumes Bona in the end. I’m surprised that Salvador didn’t win the Best Actor award at the Metro Film fest last month (so what else is new?)…” So According to Torre, Aunor was too old for the role and didn’t look innocent for the role the required naivety and innocence.

Isagani R. Cruz, another critic, who in 1981 wrote this article for TV Times have a contradicted views: “…The final sequence, where Aunor finally assaults Salvador, is excellent, although it is, of course, in the same vein as Insiang. The typical Filipino film thrives on the theme of revenge. Bona is no exception. When Aunor finally dumps the boiling water on her non-feeling master, the viewer cannot help but be moved. The sequence is effective, perhaps because the rest of the film is not…” Cruz, unlike Torre found Aunor’s acting untouchable…meaning no one can portray Bona as convincing as Nora Aunor! Here’s Mr. Cruz’ opinion: “…Aunor’s acting…saves the film. Despite the incoherent screenplay, the erratic direction, and the irrelevant production design, the film is gripping because Aunor is excellent. Aunor is indeed a signal phenomenon in Philippine film. She broke the color barrier (she is not a mestiza). She broke the marriage barrier (she is not single, nor she is she even happily married). She broke the superstar barrier (before her, superstars were supposed to be beautiful, but not good, actresses). She has now broken the untouchable barrier: in Bona, she is subjected to the most degrading physical abuses. Unlike Hilda Koronel who remained a Madonna even during the rape scene in Angela Markado. Aunor really becomes the penniless, dumb, neurotic alalay Bona is supposed to be. Who can imagine Fernando Poe, Jr. beaten to a pulp by nameless villains? Who can imagine Lloyd Samartino made up to look like a vampire? In Bona, Aunor really looks like an alalay, rather than a superstar. That is why she is, in fact, a superstar.” Wow…nice statements.

Nice because the URIAN can’t get over the same mentality/arguments (the skin color arguments etc) and despite the much more superior acting of Gina Alajar or Amy Austria in Brutal gave Aunor the nod. Actually, Aunor and Alajar tied the honor for the Urian best actress in 1980. Nine years after the Bona was shown, Bernal, Lino Brocka’s closest rival created a much better film. Like Bona, death was evident in this Bernal creation.

Pahiram Ng Isang Umaga was about Juliet, a successful advertising executive who has seven to nine months to live. Cancer stricken Juliet have to take care her responsibilities as a single mother and found herself reconciling with the people who wronged her prior to her diagnosis as cancer victim. The film wasn’t about cancer but about life and death. A very morbid, dreaded topic that very seldom being touch by local filmmakers without being melo-dramatic. Not until Bernal created Pahiram.

Mario A. Hernando, one of URIAN critics summarized splendidly the overall tone of the film, in his Malaya article on March of 1989: “…In the last scene, the imagery and symbolisms of life and death abound. Juliet dies at the break of dawn, the start of a new day (and life), but not without first making her last sentimental paean to life. Supported by the artist, her eyesight having failed completely and with the waves caressing their feet, the weak and dying cancer victim remarks how beautiful life is. True enough, this dying scene set on a beach, with the woman in white, dainty night gown, is one of the most exquisite, breathtaking moments in Philippine movies. But before giving us this grand, highly emotional death scene, the director has gradually introduced various motifs of death, from the artist’s pet black bird which at one point he cruelly squeezes in his hand, to the funeral rituals for Juliet’s father…”

Like the URIAN, the PMPC finally can’t ignore Vilma anymore. They finally rewarded Vilma her first Star Awards for her restrained triumph as Juliet. Mario Bautista, one of its members noted: “…Talaga namang dramatic tour de force for Vilma ang role niya as the dying Juliet. Maihahanay ito sa kanyang best performances in “Relasyon? “Sister Stella L? “Broken Marriage? “Ikaw ay Akin” at “Burlesk Queen? But unlike her spirited performances there, toned down na toned down ang emoting na ginawa niya rito. Iniba ni Ishmael Bernal (who really brings out the best in her)ang estilo ng acting niya. Pati ang crying scenes ay napakatahimik ng dating. ‘Yung tipong basta tumutulo na lang ang luha ni Vilma without much facial and body contortions na gaya ng dati…Dalawang beses kaming cry rito. Una’y nang nagbibilin siya kay Vicky Suba (na napakagaling din kahit walang ginawa kundi mag-react lamang kay Vi.) at sinabi niyang “Ayoko ng mahabang burol.?Isa pa’y nang finally ay magkabati na sila ng estranged sister niyang si Dexter Doria (isa pang napakahusay) na wala nang dialogue at nagyayakapan na lang sila.”

Bautista even went to the extent of writing his belief in his People’s Journal article titled “Mas Mahusay si Vilma kaysa Kay Nora.” He wrote: “…Sa second viewing ng movie namin lalong napansin ang subtle nuances ng performance ni Vi, up to her death scene which confirms our supposition that the movie is not really so much about death than a celebration of life, what with all the panoramic shots showing the beauty of nature and the world around us, na enough reason for anyone to want to survive.” When the PMPC members resolved its long time struggle to give Vilma its deserving recognition, the critics group Manunuri, decided not to ignore Nora Aunor’s mechanical performance in Bilangin Ang Bituin Sa Langit, an Elwood Perez opus. They gave the best actress to both Vilma and Nora.

Switcheroo – If Nora Aunor plays Juliet, the successful advertising executive, she will need to re-invent her image. Sophistication can be done via right wardrobe, make-up and conformability in delivering English or Taglish lines. A tasks that she failed to do before in her long film history. Her last try was in her last full length film, Naglalayag, she was very akward and unconvincing as a successful rich judge. Now, what about Vilma portraying a fanatic “alalay” in Bona? It will be a challenge. But Brocka can do wonders plus the role required for someone who can possessed innocence and naivety as Nestor Torre pointed out. Vilma would excel in these regards.

Reality Checks – As Juliet, Nora would need to work harder to be effective. She failed miserably under Mario DeLosReyes’ direction in Naglalayag. Would she produced the same results under Bernal? Maybe not but in 1989, she remained typecasted into api-apihan roles. The opposite can be said with Vilma if she played Bona. The chemistry between Vilma and Philip Salvador was established already by their successful team-up in another Brocka film, Rubia Servios. In addition Vilma’s much younger look in 1980 will fit the requirements of innocence and naivety that Nora lacks. She will be perfect to play Bona.

Boxing Results – Vilma wins again. Vilma 6, Nora 2 – To be continued…

RELATED READING:
IMDB: Nora Aunor
IMDB: Vilma Santos
Official Web-site: Vilma Santos Recto
Official Web-site: Nora Aunor ICON
Facebook: Vilma Santos Recto
Facebook: Nora Aunor
Nora & Vilma No Longer a Rivalry (a special magazine)
Boxing Matches 1/7
Vilmanians and Noranians Surveyed
About “Larawan” and Nick Joaquin
Nora at Vilma sa Gitna ng Basura
Very Long Rivalry (Repost)
Sino ba talaga ang mas mahusay umarte, si Vilma o si Nora?
May be the Philippines’ best film actress of all time 1/3
Vilma-Nora Then, Nora-Vilma Now (Repost)

Boxing Matches 5/7

We listed Vilma’s ten best films and matched it with Nora’s. We then came up with analogy of who did well in terms of credible performances. We also tried to switch the roles and see if both actress remained credible. The outcome was incredible. Boxing Matches Continues with….

Lipad Darna Lipad versus Super Gee – In 1973, Vilma’s box office clout flew higher and higher as the new Darna, Nora decided to match the new strategy her opponents were bringing in the table by producing her version of super hero via Batman inspired Super Gee. It was a perfect strategy as Vilma’s Darna was like Superman (basically Darna – – can fly), Supergee rode a vehicle, just like Batman! The customer was quite similar too as Super wore a mask, just like Batman.  Just like Darna, Super Gee came from a comics serial. It was a creation by Zoila serialized ironically in “Darna” komiks. Like in Lipad Darna Lipad, Nora casted Celia Rodriguez as her nemesis and hired Armando Garces as director. Unfortunately Nora Aunor can’t replicate the success of Darna even with the presence of Jojit Paredes and teen star Arnold Gamboa. The uninspired direction of Armando Garces didn’t helped the case too. The movie bombed in the box office and the press ridiculed Nora’s Super Gee costumes. Speaking of costumes, Madonna maybe got the inspiration for her cone bra costumes from this film.

Vilma Santos made another milestone career move. She bravely starred as the new Darna despite her lack of height. Past Darnas, From Rosa Del Rosario to Gina Pareno, prior to Vi, were all tall and toned. So the stakes are high as the film were released in March of 1973. Vilma’s supporters were relieved and ecstatic to find out the huge crowed in each theatres. It was reported that the production company, Tagalog Ilang Ilang distributed Darna dolls and Coca-Cola gave Darna masks to thousand filmgoers. Vilma will continue to starred in four more Darna movies while Super Gee quickly disappeared to its deserving death. Lipad, Darna, Lipad were divided into three separate segments with each segments and was directed by three different directors. It its First episode, Emmanuel H. Borlaza handled the exciting fight between Darna and the “Impakta” played with much gusto by Gloria Romero that climaxed into that aerial fight that ends with Gloria falling down into the church’s cross. If the first one was exciting, the second director, Elwood Perez successfully gave us a strangely cold and campy episode. Maybe because Darna’s nemesis Valentina played by Celia Rodriguez were supposed to be a supermodel hence the overtly poised gestures. She turned out to be a snake queen, turning her hair into diabolical snakes with her eyes beams up and turning whatever that touch the beams into stone. The face-off between Darna and Valentina was so stylish, sizing each other by dirty glances. It was like watching a western cowboy movie. When finally Valentina used her beams to turned Darna into stone, she was outsmarted by Darna. Using a mirror Valentina beamed her own self and she turned into stone. Add to her demise, she fell from the building and was shattered into hundred pieces! The last episode directed by the late Joey Goseingfiao featuring Liza Lorena as the hawk lady or “Babaing Lawin.” As expected Darna defeated her third nemesis but compared to the first two episodes, the fight scenes here were less exciting. We both seen Super Gee and Lipad Darna Lipad. Unfortunately, Super Gee was so poorly done that we can’t remember it’s full story. The press were also in agreement with me as there were no articles whatsoever written about this film even via internet.

Switcheroo – Would Vilma gave Super Gee it’s rightful shot in the arm if she did plays the fully clothed super hero? The answer would be yes. Nora lacks physicality that the Super Gee role requires. Vilma’s dancing experience earlier in her career helped her to do the action scenes better than Nora. What about Nora as Darna? Can you imagine Nora in those skimpy two-piece bikini costumes? I don’t think Nora would fit the role of Darna considering the history of physical attributes of past Darnas. A brow-skinned Darna that would be a first. But would the masses accepts this drastic change? Remember this was 1973, segregation in the US was a big social issue. In the Philippines, Nora Aunor may have changed some mind when it comes to the skin color issue but talent and physicality would play an important factor to be convincing as Darna.

Reality Check – Like so many fantasy characters that Vilma did in the 70s (like dyesebel, phantom lady and wonder vi), she will excelled as Super Gee. The opposite can be said with Nora doing the Darna role. Her lack of physical attributes that a Darna role calls will failed her miserably.

Tagos Ng Dugo versus Bulaklak Ng City Jail– Tagos and Bulaklak gave both Vilma and Nora best actress awards from the Catholic Mass Media Awards in 1987 and 1984 respectively. Considering the graphic violence and shady story lines, it was ironic that CMMA gave the nods to both actresses. A proof that despite it’s presumed image (CMMA was a religious organization), deserving performances should be rewarded with its rightful recognitions.  In Tagos Ng Dugo, Vilma Santos gave us another versatile performance. She won her fourth FAMAS best actress in addition to the CMMA and minor awards from the Movie Magazine and Cinemascope for the role of Fina, a distraught woman who becomes a murderer every time her period comes.

A role that was too bold and daring in the eyes of Maricel Soriano. She was initially offered to play the lead role but turned down it down despite previous success with director Maryo De Los Reyes. An unidentified writer analyzed Tagos Ng Dugo as “a breakthrough for Philippine psychological movies.” The writer added that the film was a cross between Francois Truffaut’s “The Bride Wore Black” and Luis Benuel’s “Belle Du Joir.” Films that I have to check out to get the writer’s point. Anyhow, the writer added: “….I don’t know if screenwriter Jake Tordesillas or Delos Reyes himself should be congratulated for the cohesion of multi-resultants in this work. Part of this multi-readings would be the movie as a feminist take on womankind’s monthly pains as a form of excuse for female monthly insanities, insanities our macho’s regard as regular terrorism on the whole of mankind (men or society as a whole). It is with that reading that the ending apologies, by Vilma Santos in the lead role, might be understood as a plea for understanding of how all of woman’s monthly Eve-behavior should not be seen as a Biblical sin but as an equal (to, say, man’s beastly) naturalness… “

Tagos Ng Dugo, a feminist film? The writer pointed out: “…the film as a view of how Philippine society (the men in it, primarily) approaches provincial innocence, educational weakness, and “female’s weaker sanity as stimuli for abuse… There is, however, the possibly more general reading of the film as an apologia for insanity qua itself, how it should be treated as a disease instead of as a monster to be eliminated… And finally, there’s the possibility that the film is actually a depiction of how crazy the world outside the insane mind really is, albeit this view would probably be the least successful direction for the film… As a bonus, maybe we can also bring the movie to more latent, more philosophical territory, say, how it depicts the sanity of innocence.”  The writer obviously seen the film numerous times to appreciate it’s every details. It its final analysis: “…what finally makes this movie a jewel in Philippine cinema history is how it brings forth — every time you watch it — its case achievements in directorial and film editing dramaturgy (including the recurring stage-like choreography, Hitchcockish camera positioning, and acting pacing within). For the serious student of third world filmmaking, here is a requisite Philippine movie from where to cull precious fragments. In these fragments, he/she is sure to find sparkles that are in themselves gems.”

For us, the technical superiority of this film was jus the back drop of the stellar performance of Vilma Santos. Her numerous character changes in accordance to her next sexual victims was choreographed in such intensity that the anguish fate of each of her victims were expected and tragic. When the Final climaxed scene arrives we were so conditioned to see a dead Fina but we were surprised by her strong wailing and maddening facial hatred that we understood her full emotion. A cry for help. It was the most intense scene we ever seen her ever since we started following her movie career.  In 1984, Nora Aunor came-up with another successful run at the local festival. Produced by Cherubim films, Bulaklak Sa City Jail was an entry to that year’s Metro Manila Film fest. The film earned Nora Aunor her deserving trophy as the festival’s best actress and also Mario O Harra the best director as well as the best supporting actress for Celia Rodriguez. Despite its festival success, only the CMMA rewarded Nora as their best actress of 1984.

Mario Bautista in his article for the Philippine Daily Express wrote about the film’s story line as: “Nora is Angela, an orphan who falls for a married man and is later accused of trying to kill his wife. But the film is more than just her story. It is an indictment of a prison system that instead of helping in the rehabilitation of inmates only make them worse.” He praised Nora’s acting as: “…Nora Aunor gives a very moving performance, notwithstanding that zoo childbirth scene specially engineered to endear her to her fans…” He’s probably talking about the numerous facial shots of Nora in the zoo, as if saying, “look at those eyes…Just by this, she should be rewarded.” The film was written by Lualhati Bautista and Mario commended the writer’s excellent script. But with so many characters and plot twists, it was at the hands of the director to fleshes out these challenges. And O Harra succeeded in giving us a much better film compared, according to Bautista, to his previous offering, the equally ambitious Condemned.

Switcheroo – Would Nora be convincing as the murderous Fina in Tagos Ng Dugo? A project that even Maricel Soriano turned down because of its boldness and daring theme. The ability to jumped into unfamiliar territory and Aunor’s restrictive image will frankly played (again!) an important factors in figuring out if Aunor would do justice as Fina. Meanwhile, if Nora will struggle playing such bold and daring roles like Fina in Tagos, Vilma will excel as Angela in Bulaklak, as she played a similar role, as the convicted inmate in period film, Baby Tsina.

Reality Checks – Nora Aunor will turned down Fina. Vilma Santos will prove her versatility as Angela. For Noranians, unfortunately their idol’s lacks of versatility will play an important factor if we switch roles.

Pinay American Style versus Merika – Pinay American Style and Merika were both films were shot on location in the United States. Elwood Perez and Gil Portes, its film directors tackled the flight of two Filipinas, one was an illegal alien and one was an established nurse, both from New York. The technical acting talent of both actress were in full display here.  Vilma was obviously under utilized as PX in these Elwood Perez experiment. Despite this predicament, Vilma was able to give us a splash of her abilities. While Nora was in full bloom as Mila in these quiet Portes film. She gave us a convincing portrayal of lonely woman who realized that she was being used by a man she truly loves. The contrast of style was the main point why I matched these two roles.  As PX, Vilma was talkative, hiding her insecurity and vulnerability with her fragile disguise as rich New Yorker with almost caricature gestures. Quite the opposite of Nora. Nora was Mila, a quiet, stable nurse whose vulnerability raised to its fullness the moment she discovered she’s in loved with an illegal aliens who was just using her to get a green card.

Let’s start with Nora… In 1984, PMPC created their own award giving bodies. They called it the Star Awards. And with much fanfare, they only nominated two actress, Vilma Santos and Nora Aunor. Aunor was nominated for her performances in three films: Bulaklak sa City Jail, Condemned and Merika. Santos was nominated for two films: Baby Tsina and Sister Stella L. The past decades proved to be an advantage for Nora Aunor. She got an excellent stronghold of a group of movie writers who dominated the membership of PMPC. It will take five long years before PMPC evened out Aunor’s stronghold.   It was reported that members of PMPC had a long night debating who will get their first award. Eventually Nora’s quiet performance as Mila in Merika won over the majority of its members. Noranians were ecstatic as Vilma’s lucent transformation in Sister Stella L were ignored. In 1984 Tempo article titled “Tender effort: one from the heart” written by Emmanuel A. Reyes, the dream of many Filipinos to fulfill their American dreams were emphasized.

Reyes said”:’…Merika comes at a trying moment when the foremost thing on people’s minds is to flee the archipelago for more rewarding frontiers. Sadly enough, after 38 years of independence, the Filipino no longer sees his own country as land of opportunity. The promise of progress has gone bust. Traditional values of home, family, and love of country have consequently eroded under the threat of hunger and torment. The need for more money has become apparent. Faced with the need to survive, the Filipino is forced to seek work elsewhere. He is happy for a while to be in another corner of the world. But when he realizes that he is no longer the king of his own culture but a servant of a more affluent race, he starts to dream about home and wish for that life he had left behind.” I can’t agree more…  Reyes pointed out the simplicity of Merika’s production value that adds to its luster as very effective film: “…Merika doesn’t attempt to declare anything big about Filipinos and their life in the United States. It’s a simple story of loneliness and survival in the land of milk and honey… What is clearly admirable about “‘Merika,” is its affecting portrait of loneliness, so thoughtfully realized by Nora Aunor’s touching performance, Gil Portes’s direction and Doy del Mundo and Gil Quito’s homely screenplay. The film does not emphasize a single, urgent cause for Mila’s wanting to go home precisely because such loneliness cannot be quantified. For the migrant Filipino, this kind of loneliness exists in mind and heart but it can never be completely expressed. It’s a feeling so deep seated, it couldn’t be relieved entirely, even by a long-distance call. The film utilizes many images to describe this sad feeling—from chilly scenes of winter to bare trees, disabled senior citizens, to the never-ending pictures on television. It all adds up to a very, very cold account of a life of sacrifice in a country of great expectations.”

Meanwhile if we praised the simplicity of the overall production of Merika, it can’t be said with Regal films’ Pinay American Style. It was as commercial as one can imagine. Regal films hired three leading men to support the most bankable actress of 1979, Christopher DeLeon, Bembol Rocco and Victor Cocoy Laurel. It was a stage in Vilma’s career where she doing one commercial films after the other. Mostly targeting the mature adult audience. A trend that Nora Aunor can’t seem to tap. Aunor has established her clout as a serious actress in 1979 by producing a number of ambitious projects, tapping high caliber directors but was always came-up short when the box office tallies were recorded.  Both Nora and Vilma did eight movies in 1979. Nora did two musicals the hit, Annie Batungbakal and the flop, Disco King. Four were light comedies and two serious drama. Her year ended with a collaboration with Brocka and Lolita Rodriguez in Ina Ka Ng Anak Mo. The film earned Aunor another festival best actress but was unsuccessful to out throne the tandem of Charito Solis and Vilma Santos in their film entry into the same festival in Bancom’s Modelong Tanso.

Vilma in 1979 was a picture of self-assured bankable star. Like Nora, she did two musical, the mild hit, Swing it baby and the blockbuster Rock Baby Rock. She did two movies with Elwood Perez, Magkaribal and Pinay American Style both were box office hits. The rest of her project were a film under her own film company, an Eddie Rodrigues starrer Halik sa Paa Halik sa Kamay, a comedy with Dolphy and the year end explosive, Tanso with drama queen Charito Solis. The end of the decade marked her stronghold as the box office queen. A feat Nora Aunor can’t seem to figure out. Clearly, Vilma Santos’ versatility was the secret weapon. And this weapon was in full display in Perez’ second film with Vilma in 1979.  Pinay American Style was the story of PX, an illegal alien or TNT, tago ng tago. Her boyfriend played by Victor Laurel abandoned her for an rich American girl mainly to secure a green card. PX met an Americanized Filipino, Christopher DeLeon but found him not serious of having her as a steady girlfriend. It just so happened that PX also met Christopher DeLeon’s brother, Bembol Rocco, a new immigrant. PX and Bembol fell for each other. And a love triangle surfaced the screen. Adding to the drama was Victor Laurel’s enraged, jealous appearances. Laurel eventually tipped the police ending PX stays in New York. As Bembol Rocco realized that America doesn’t fit his lifestyle he reconciled with his brother and advised him to follow PX in the Philippines. Both Christopher and Vilma reconciled in a farm field in the Philippines. The end.

The film was so forgettable that the critics didn’t even bother to write any reviews. The lack of enthusiasm on the part of the critics were compensated with the box office success of the film. Vilma fits the role as the illegal alien, PX. Her attempt to speak fluent English and pretend that she’s rich when she met the boyish looking Christopher was funny and poignant. She was given enough scenes to shine. One was the scene after she was harassed by her landlady. She opened her refrigerator and found a staled piece of bread. She took a bottled water and ate the bread, found her mom’s letter and lying down in bed started to break down. A quiet scene without dialogue. A contrast from the earlier scenes where she started to be talkative, as she tried to impress Christopher, telling him she’s rich and from a well-known family. It was obvious in 1979, Elwood Perez wasn’t the kind of director you will expect to produce a serious output. He wasn’t a Bernal or Brocka. He’s a commercial director. It was a better effort though, compared to a much more convoluted Magkaribal or their past successful projects like Nakawin natin ang bawat sandali and masakit masarap ang umibig. In Pinay, Toto Belano’s script wasn’t efficient enough in ironing out the quadrangle plot twists and establishing the characters of four actors. So the blame can’t be put to Perez shoulder alone. There was a scene were Vilma Santos and Christopher were watching a concert which was obviously not part of the script.

Switcheroo – Vilma Santos did a movie, Miss X under Gil Portes prior to Nora Aunor’s 1984 Merika. And she did a wonderful job. The requirement of Mila, the lonely nurse in this film wasn’t new to Vilma. She did a splash of quiet scene ironically in Pinay American Style. And so we concluded that Vilma would do justice to the role of Mila. If we switched roles and Nora played PX in 1979, the film would have a different version. Would she be convincing as a talkative PX, hiding her vulnerability with a delicate facade by pretending she this socialite? It will be a challenge considering that Perez is not Portes.

Reality Checks – Vilma can effectively do a quiet restrained role. She will be effective as Mila in Merika. Nora will have a hard time convincing us as PX.

Boxing Results – Surprisingly, Vilma wins again. Vilma 9, Nora 2 – To be continued…

RELATED READING:
Official Web-site: Vilma Santos Recto
Official Web-site: Nora Aunor ICON
Facebook: Vilma Santos Recto
Facebook: Nora Aunor
Wikipedia: Vilma Santos
Wikipedia: Nora Aunor
Superstar Nora Aunor
Star For All Seasons Vilma Santos
Nora Aunor Film Actress
Vilma Santos Film Actress
And God Smiled at Me vs. Dama de Noche
Vilma-Nora Then, Nora-Vilma Now
Will Vilma Santos do a Nora Aunor?
A Tale of Two Movie Queens
About “Larawan” and Nick Joaquin
T-Bird at Ako (1982) (Video)

Boxing Matches 3/7

We listed Vilma’s ten best films and matched it with Nora’s. We then came up with analogy of who did well in terms of credible performances. We also tried to switch the roles and see if both actress remained credible. The outcome was incredible. Boxing Matches Continues with….

Tatlong Taong Walang Diyos versus Dekada 70 – Two political period films. Tatlong Taong Walang Diyos was about a love triangle set in the Japanese occupation of the Philippines and Dekada 70 was about a family in a society under the Marcos dictatorship.

It was reported that Dekada 70 was first offered to Nora Aunor. Whatever happened to that plan remained just a tiny anecdote to the Dekada’s success. Vilma Santos played the lead role with richness that we could not imagine other actresses playing her role including Nora Aunor. This Chito Rono film garnered Vilma 9 awards for Vilma Santos as Amanda Bartolome. Also, the film was entered to Cannes Film Festival and at Cinemanila International Film Festival where Vilma won her second international best actress. Dekada 70 was also the Philippines entry to the foreign language category of the OSCAR. Not bad for a film not originally intended for Vilma.

Ronnie Schieb of Variety Magazine described the film and Vilma’s performance: “…At the center of the film and the family is Amanda (Filipino cinematic diva Vilma Santos) who vicariously experiences living under a dictatorship through her husband and five sons’ different reactions before coming into her own as a person. Her husband, Julian (Christopher de Leon), seems a walking contradiction: he offers rationalizations for the government while supporting his eldest son’s revolutionary activities, but has a fit when his wife wants a job…As for the sons, firstborn son (Piolo Pascual) joins the guerillas in the mountains. The second son (Carlos Agassi), forced into a shotgun wedding, defiantly works for the American navy. The third son (Marvin Agustin) writes journalistic expose’ he can’t publish, while the fourth son (Danilo Barrios) is a mystery to his family until his brutal, motiveless murder (probably by police) reveals a lost girlfriend. The fifth son (John W. Sace) is still a boy…Santos’ Amanda effortlessly and movingly chronicles the changed consciousness of the family and the country, with understatement her most reliable tool. The film begins and ends with images of Santos at the forefront of a political demonstration, and nothing, from first image to last, for 128 minutes, is allowed to spontaneously or slyly deviate from the logic of her consciousness-raising.”

Tatlong Taong Walang Diyos on the other hand was really conceptualized and produced for Nora Aunor…but wait…she was the producer! In 1976, Mario O’Harra, the director and writer was at his peak of his career. Critics were disappointed with his earlier works because they had high expectations but most were delighted that he redeemed himself by coming up with a superb production and acting in Tatlong Taon.  The critics (URIAN) and even Famas rewarded O’Harra with the satisfaction of witnessing the acting recognition of Aunor, his producer. As producer, Nora Aunor’s Tatlong Taong Walang Diyos faced another gigantic film, Ganito Kami Nuon Paano Kayo Ngayon and lost the best picture in both Famas and URIAN.

For many Noranians the failure of the film to win the best picture wasn’t as important as the win of Aunor in both URIAN and Famas. For them this was a grand slam. Never mind that in order to be considered a grand slam it should be four or five majors just like in tennis. The reasoning behind it was that there were only two major award giving bodies back then. But in 1976, no term was given to Nora’s wins. Not until Vilma’s swept of all the best actress awards in 1982 that the term “grand slam” was brought up in papers! She was even given a “Walis” award for this feat.

Pio de Castro III on his article for The Times Journal in 1976 dissected Tatlong Taon with it’s unrealistic theatrical touches in so many scenes but was impressed with the film’s lead actress performance. And he wrote: “…The film recounts the story of Rosario (Nora Aunor), a schoolteacher in a small town in Laguna, whose heart is torn between her romantic love for Crispin (Rafael Roco Jr.), a guerilla who survived Bataan and the Death March, and her realistic love for Masugi (Christopher de Leon), a dashingly handsome Japanese officer born in Manila of a Filipino mother. It is a touching story of private people thrown into unimagined stress during turbulent times of Japanese Occupation. A time when man, woman and child doubted the existence of God because they saw with their own eyes man’s inhumanity to man. It was an era that marked the Filipino’s loss of innocence. It was an era that started rampant corruption, smuggling, arson, robbery, rape and murder. The Filipino way of life was never quite the same again. It was the end of “peace time.” …People who used to smile and wink when they talk of Nora Aunor as an actress should see this film, because the lady is determined to show everybody that she means business both as an actress and as a producer. In this film she is successful as both…”

Switcheroo – In 1976, like Nora Aunor, Vilma Santos produced her own film, titled Mga Rosas Sa Putikan, a less ambition film than Tatlong Taon. She doesn’t have to prove much about acting as Nora Aunor’s whole intention in producing Tatlong Taon. Like the usual suspects, would Vilma be as effective as Nora as probinsiyana in Tatlong Taon? In 1976, her usual roles are either a spoiled brat, socialite modern woman mostly a picture of youthful rebel. This might strikes against her in performing such a serious role like Tatlong Taon. It will take another year before critics takes her seriously as an fine A-1 actress via Burlesk Queen. This is different in the case of Vilma playing Elsa.

Vilma as Elsa in 1982 will be easy because she already discovered her technical camaraderie with Bernal. Her not fitting as probinsiyana will be remedied by the talent of her director Bernal. In this case, would O’Harra be able to make Vilma as Rosario effective as he did with Nora? I doubt it. O”Harra was a die-hard Noranian. He will be ill-equipped to figure out a way for Vilma to do the Rosario role despite the fact that Vilma is equally capable for such role.

It is worth noting that Vilma portrayed a similar “probinsiyana” look two years after in Tatlong Taon were shown, and it her own produced film, in 1978’s Pagputi Ng Uwak Pag-itim Ng tagak. Fast forward to 2002, Star Cinema bought the rights to Lualhati Bautista’s Dekada 70 and gave the project to Vilma Santos. This was after the box office successes of Anak and Bata Bata Paano Ka Ginawa. The film ripped prestige to the film outfit and cemented its reputation as the number one film outfit of the land probably next to Regal films.

Would the same results arise if Nora Aunor starred as Amanda Bartolome in Dekada 70?

Given the fact that Nora is a capable actress and Star Cinema are know to its high quality production, the feasibility is high. BUT…fast forward to another two years, Naglalayag laid an egg in the box office. Amazingly disappointed was the producer who witnessed the closing of many theatres after its only third days of showing of the film.  A clear proof that Nora Aunor has lost her clout as a box office drawer.

Reality Checks – No doubt Nora Aunor fits the role of Rosario to a T. Vilma will be out of cast as the provinciana in a Japanese occupation in 1976 if the director remained to be Mario O’Harra. In the case of Nora Aunor playing Amanda Bartolome in Dekada, she is capable of playing the role of the mother in the Marcos society but clearly it will not be as commercially successful given her series of unsuccessful comebacks.

Boxing Results – Nora wins. Vilma 5, Nora 2  – To be continued…

RELATED READING:
Official Web-site: Vilma Santos Recto
Official Web-site: Nora Aunor ICON
Facebook: Vilma Santos Recto
Facebook: Nora Aunor
Wikipedia: Vilma Santos
Wikipedia: Nora Aunor
Superstar Nora Aunor
Star For All Seasons Vilma Santos
Nora Aunor Film Actress
Vilma Santos Film Actress
And God Smiled at Me vs. Dama de Noche
Vilma-Nora Then, Nora-Vilma Now
Will Vilma Santos do a Nora Aunor?
A Tale of Two Movie Queens
About “Larawan” and Nick Joaquin
T-Bird at Ako (1982) (Video)

Boxing Matches 2/7

We listed Vilma’s ten best films and matched it with Nora’s. We then came up with analogy of who did well in terms of credible performances.  We also tried to switch the roles and see if both actress remained credible.  The outcome was incredible. Boxing Matches Continues with….

Sister Stella L versus Himala – Why Himala versus Sister Stella L (instead of Himala versus Relasyon)? Well, I believe they’re match in terms of the seriousness of the projects. Both were directed by a serious director who in 1982 and 1984 were both at their peaks of their careers. Both also earned their leading actress only one award each. Both didn’t fare well at the box office. But lastly, both films did well in the international scenes.

Sister Stella L was invited to Cannes but due technical shortcomings it wasn’t shown in there but at the equally prestigious Venice Film Festival. Himala on the other hand graced the international scene via our very own Manila International Film Festival under the Marcos administration. The dismal box office result of Sister Stella L were compensated by its critical achievements. In Urian alone, it earned 10 awards including a best actress nod to Vilma Santos, completing her three-year consecutive wins. Meanwhile after the success of Himala in the local festival that earned Nora a best actress award, Himala was relegated to runner up as another ECP film, “Oro, Plata, Mata” amassed its rightful honors as the best film of 1982. For many critics, Himala was maybe one of the most underrated film and they gave the film its rightful recognition by recognizing it as one of the best in 80s.

One of the Manunuri critics, Alfred A. Yuson, in his Philippine Daily Express article in 1983 summed-up Nora’s performance as follows: “Nora Aunor is perfect as Elsa; she leaves nothing to be desired in her interiorization and delivery…The brilliant Aunor gets all the solid backing she can ever get, this time from an array of supporters drawn mostly from the Bulwagang Gantimpala stable…”

Next is Vilma, Alice G. Guillermo in her article titled “More than just entertainment” for Who Magazine dated 30 May 1984 chronicled Vilma’s performance as: “..For a heart-warming film, the entire cast deserves congratulations, particularly Vilma Santos who reveals another aspect of her multi-faceted talent. From her usual soft and sweet romantic roles, she can be transformed into a strong and militant woman without losing any of her charm and beauty…”

In 1982, Nora Aunor was conditioned to make some dents in the award giving seasons and yet she went empty handed every time the awards nights were held. The gigantic role as Elsa was slingshot by a tiny film ironically performed

by her rival. Another ironic note was that the film that defeated Himala, Relasyon was also directed by the same director, Bernal.

It was worth the wait for Vilma, her disappointments from previous years of neglect from the award giving bodies were now all gone. She earned her first best actress grand slam. Nora’s “goliath” kind of performance as Elsa reached its match by the “davidian” typed of performance of Vilma in Relasyon. And this adds intensity to the defeats, the wounds. Noranian will never admit the enourmosity of these defeats. This is for the fact that Himala was considered one of the biggest film of 1982 again next to Oro Plata Mata. And that Relasyon is not even at the same league at least in the eyes of Noranians.

As fair as we can be, we accepted the fact that Relasyon wasn’t matched with the scope of Himala. And so I decided to match Himala with Sister Stella L. In 1984, Vilma Santos has arrived in the big-time, A-1 league of fine acting. This was despite her earlier history of dramatic excellence, as a child actress and a teenage supporting actress. Her experiences in getting empty handed come awards nights have evaporated. She became the darling of the awards nights starting from her first grand slam wins. This will confirmed by her three consecutive wins from the critics den, the Gawad Urian. Sister Stella L gave her so much consolation from its dismal box office returns that tainted her illustrious records as the most bankable actress of the 80s. In 1984 URIAN, her most stiff competitions came from the performances of her closest rival, again Nora in two films, Merika and Bulaklak Ng City Jail. And from many awards aficionado, it was a matter of split votes that’s why Nora didn’t win. Nora will win the very first PMPC Star Awards for Merika but in the local critic’s eyes, Vilma’s deep transformation from a blatant observer to a pro-active activist nun was the best of all-best in 1984.

Switcheroo – If we switched roles, Nora Aunor as Sister Stella L and Vilma Santos as Elsa…hmmm we all know that both are well equipped, acting wise and so it is not hard for us to say that both can do justice with each roles. We have seen Nora as a nun in one of her forgettable film in the 70s titled Fe, Esperanza, Caridad. The segment where she played the nun being tempted by the devil played by Ronaldo Valdez was directed by Gerry DeLeon. It was not the serious typed SSL project but a horror experiment. Nora looks comfortable as a nun in Fe, Esperanza, Caridad but would she visibly transformed her looks from innocence to militancy as Sister Stella? It is hard to answer. We are used to see Vilma as SSL. It will be 50-50.

Then Vilma as Elsa. Elsa is a probinsiyana, a devoted Catholic who became a ritualistic faith healer. Would Vilma’s fresh face and urbanites physicality be a barrier for her to do the Elsa role? Remember this is 1982. The answer would be yes but this can be remedied by make-up and proper attire. Bernal have deglamorized Vilma before like in Broken Marriage, no make-up with plain clothes resulted in her effective portrayal of a woman who find herself difficulty balancing career with family life.

The problem arised as like Vilma in SSL, we all identified Elsa with Nora. It is hard for us to imagine Vilma in it. But like I’ve said, proper costumes and make-up and the excellent motivation from Bernal will not stop Vilma to do justice to the role of Elsa. And same can be said with Nora as Sister Stella L.

Reality Checks – We identified Elsa in Himala to Nora Aunor and Sister Stella in Sister Stella L to Vilma Santos. It is hard for someone to see them switched roles but with the technical guidance of Bernal and DeLeon the film directors of the respective films, both Santos and Aunor would undoubtedly do justice to each roles.

Vilma’s urbanites beauty and fresh face in 1982 would not prevent her to do justice to the Elsa role. Her acting technique was in full bloom in 1982. It would be amazing to see how she will attack the role. Nora’s ordinary beauty that the mass can identified will bring different take as SSL. It would be amazing too to see how she will tackle the transformation

that Vilma gave us on screen.

Boxing Results – Nora as SSL – yes it can be achieved. Vilma as Elsa, absolutely. It’s a tie. Vilma 4, Nora 1

Flor Contemplacion Story versus Dahil Mahal kita: the Dolzura Cortez Story – Now let’s take on two true to life films. The social relevance of both Dolzura and Flor was as intense as the performances of the lead actress portraying the lives of these true to life women.

Dolzura’s life as the first publicly known Aids victim in the Philippines was important because of its social message she wanted to conveyed to her fellow countrymen and the promotion of safer sex.  Flor’s life on the other hand opened our eyes about the hardship many overseas worker faces in foreign lands.

Both films earned Vilma and Nora critical acclaims. Vilma won her second grand slam best actresses and Nora her first grand slam best actresses with a bonus of her first International recognition from the Cairo International Film Festival.

Emmanuel Levy in his Variety magazine article wrote in 1995: “Aunor invests her role with powerful emotions and utmost conviction, showing how a humble, self-sacrificing mother became a victim of corruption and abuse — and later, a national symbol adored by her countrymen…” The critics, URIAN, couldn’t agree more. They gave Aunor their best actress although she shared the best actress award with Helen Gamboa in ironically for the same story in Bagong Bayani OCW. Aunor will eventually wins solo in Film Academy of the Phils., Star Awards, Young Critics Circle and because she’s already a hall of famer at Famas, she was given a consolation honor via FAMAS Circle of Excellence.

Levy also wrote: “The Flor Contemplacion Story” is an often stirring re-creation of the true-life story of a Filipino maid who was executed in Singapore in 1995 for allegedly killing a co-worker and a young boy. A strong performance by movie star Nora Aunor dominates the film, which is at once a touching family saga and a forceful look at social injustice. However,

unrestrained melodramatics and excessive running time undermine overall impact of a story whose facts are still in dispute. Extreme poverty and an accompanying sense of hopelessness have driven many Filipinos out of their country, seeking employment abroad. The plight of women employed as domestic workers has been a major problem, with many reportedly suffering torture, rape and other abuse from their masters. A devoted mother of four, Flor Contemplacion (Aunor) went to Singapore to work as a maid, where her employers treated her fairly. However, in March 1995, she was arrested and hanged for allegedly murdering another maid, Delia Maga (Amy Austria), and the Singaporean boy Delia

was taking care of. Framed as a mystery, the tale uses flashbacks that not only enrich the story, but successfully move the film beyond a case of social outrage into a heart-wrenching exploration of women’s inferiority in a patriarchal system. Indeed, Flor’s long absences from home drove her weak hubby Efren (Julio Diaz) into an open relationship with a mistress and forced her two older children into early marriages. In one of the film’s many touching scenes, Flor visits her family, but she can’t distinguish between her twins. According to the film, there’s no doubt that Flor was innocent and that her confession was obtained through physical torment. The picture offers political background that implicates the Philippine government with cruel negligence and incompetence in the case.

For giving Vilma her second grand slam wins, Dolzura Cortez’ most relevant exposure was it’s universal appeal to promote safer sex. The film was featured in You and Aids web-site in their arts cape section. Although the web-site didn’t mentioned about the excellent performance Vilma gave us, it mentioned about the films synopsis with some accuracy: “This Philippine drama chronicles the colorful life of Dolzura Cortez, the first publicly recognized AIDS patient in the Philippines . The film begins with a brief examination of Cortez’s pre-AIDS life. Initially she lived in a small village with her cruel husband and three kids. The spunky woman leaves them and moves to the big city where she engages in several affairs. Her second marriage to a rich foreigner does not last long. To support her children, Dolly begins an all woman “contract worker” agency. This also serves to facilitate her love of night-life. Tragedy comes to Dolzura after she collapses on a dance floor one night and learns that she has full-blown AIDS. At a Manila hospital she meets ex-lover Paulo, an AIDS researcher who encourages to tell her story publicly. The courageous woman does and she becomes instrumental in spreading AIDS awareness to the islands…It was the first movie on AIDS in the Philippines that provided ‘a name and a face’ among the 50 recorded lives that were lost to AIDS in 1992. This movie was utilized as a focus of discussion by some health care personnel to express their thoughts, opinions and recommendations regarding the use of cinema as a powerful tool for AIDS information dissemination.”

Switcheroo – We have to be clear here. Both Vilma and Nora didn’t look like Flor and Dolzura in real life. Well, Dolzura and Vilma both have fair skin and petite but that’s all the similarities. Flor and Nora has no similarities in physical features.

It was worth noting that Flor story doesn’t end with this film alone. Her story was similarly penned in Helen Gamboa’s Bagong Bayani and the forgettable film by Elizabeth Oropeza. All of these films didn’t put any physical resemblance to the real life Flor Contemplacion. So, I came to a conclusion that if we switched roles, physical resemblances would not be a big issue.

As we all know Vilma played convincingly a role identified with Nora in Anak. Five years earlier, will Vilma be able to play Flor Contemplacion, a maid in a foreign land? No doubt. Her maturity was all in full displayed in Dolzura Cortez.

In 1995 Nora Aunor’s career has been in decline. Prior to Flor, she did only four films all become failures in the box office. All she needed was a big comeback. And she did it via Flor Contemplacion. Will she able to do justice if she did Dolzura Cortez in 1993? Acting wise, it will be a gutsy move. The film will require her to play a woman who enjoys sex, a sex club owner. Will she be able to do justice to all sex scenes finally getting rid of her virginal image? A question we asked a number of times now

Reality Checks – Sex and Nora Aunor. It’s like water and oil. It doesn’t mix well. Dolzura’s life was full of sex related issues – prostitution, unsafe sex, relationships, poverty. Nora Aunor has the acting equipment to do justice for such role but her image and limitation to jump into an unknown territory always prevented her to do other types of roles. Vilma on the other hand embraced challenges. She will be tested if she’ll do the Flor role. And she will passed the test with flying colors!

Boxing Results Vilma 5, Nora 1 – Nora as Dolzura will be a challenge, a no-no to her restricted image. Vilma on the other hand will jumped into the challenges of becoming Flor. Vilma wins.  To be continued…

RELATED READING:
IMDB: Nora Aunor
IMDB: Vilma Santos
Official Web-site: Vilma Santos Recto
Official Web-site: Nora Aunor ICON
Facebook: Vilma Santos Recto
Facebook: Nora Aunor
Nora & Vilma No Longer a Rivalry (a special magazine)
Boxing Matches 1/7
Vilmanians and Noranians Surveyed
About “Larawan” and Nick Joaquin
Nora at Vilma sa Gitna ng Basura
Very Long Rivalry (Repost)
Sino ba talaga ang mas mahusay umarte, si Vilma o si Nora?
May be the Philippines’ best film actress of all time 1/3
Vilma-Nora Then, Nora-Vilma Now (Repost)

Sino ba talaga ang mas mahusay umarte, si Vilma o si Nora?

“Nora vs. Vilma, Vilma vs. Nora…Kanino ka? Dekada 70 hanggang 80, nagpaligsahan ang Superstar at Star For All Seasons sa paramihan ng magazine covers. Halos linggo-linggo ay walang humpay ang paglabas ng mga movie/fan magazines na sila ang cover dahil sa mainit na rivalry ng dalawang de kalibreng aktres. Ilan lamang ang sumusunod na mga magazines kung saan sila ang cover.” – James DR (READ MORE)


Sagot Ng Isang Noranian:

Sa sandaling ito, kakalimutan ko munang isa akong fan ni ate guy. I will transform myself as a jury weighing how these two incomparable competitive Actresses span their acting career for more than four decades have fascinated us all! Minahal natin silang dalawa pati na rin ang mga taong minahal at minamahal pa nila. Malaki ang ginawa nang dalawang ito sa pagkilala at paghubog sa lalo pang ikagaganda nang takbo ng industriya nang pelikulang pilipino. Pinadama at pinakita nila ang anyo at mensahe nang bawat karakter na kanilang ginampanan (at gagampanan pa!). Maaring sa ibang paraan ay masasabi kong magpahanggang ngayon umiinog pa rin sa kanilang dalawa ang takbo ng showbiz, isang hudyat nang pagpapahalaga na hindi nalilingid at maitatanggi ng karamihan sa atin na sila lamang dalawa ang may mas higit na naiambag sa institusyon nang puting tabing at sa labanang propesyonal na ito lamang muli’t muli silang pupukaw at hahaplos sa puso nating lahat. Sabi ko kanina, kakalimutan ko munang maging isang Noranian — mahirap yata ito para sa akin. Heto nga’t hindi pa tapos itong sinusulat ko eh balik Noranian uli ako! May history kasi ito eh, seven yrs. pa lang ako alam kong isa na akong Noranian and that has already been confirmed because I remember when I was somewhere between five or four, binutas ko ang isang speaker nang aming Stereo para lang silipin kung nanduon si Ate Guy kung talagang kumakanta siya ng “pearly shell”! Sound stupid but I guess that really showed how an innocent boy would go all the way just to see the glimpse of his Idol!( to the extent that I even wanted to be sounded like her, her voice and the whole enchelada!) Hanggang na-developed pa ‘yun noong lagi pa akong kasama ni Nanay sa mga pagtitinda nang mga doormat , iskoba, bunot at mga iba’t iba pang household cleaning stuff! Enjoy ako kasi after we did all the selling at the end of the day ang treat ni Nanay sa akin ay ang manood kami ng pelikula ni ate guy. Unang movie niya na napanood ko sa sine ay ang “The Impossible Dream”! sa Cinerama ko pa napanood ‘yun (kanto ng Claro M. Recto at Roxas blvd.) Topbilling were Miss Nora Aunor and Cocoy Laurel! Hanggang nagkasunod-sunod na yung mga pelikula niyang pinanood ko, ‘yung iba nakalimutan ko na ang title pero itong mga pelikulang ito ang kabisado ko, “Paru-parung itim” based ito sa isang english movie, na bulag at pipi siya. I like the scene ‘yung pinapakain siya ni Boots Anson-Roa and Nora was out of control and being taught how to eat properly. From there, she was astounding and learning how her eyes project to the screen and at the same time show how to express the feeling of lost and helpless through her cinematic eyes were just impressive! “Ikaw ay akin” sa pelikulang ‘yun nilamon niya nang buhay ang kanyang hiwalay na asawa na si Boyet at ang rival niyang si Vi and up to now (last scene of that movie!) kumpara sa may mga kung sinu-sinong title na may star sa unahan man o sa huli, too bad so sad and i know you all gone that far but not,,,,, beyond! Wala pa akong makitang may kakayahang pupuwedeng gumawa uli nang ganung eksena and that includes your” beloved”( ano ba yan, title pa ng isang movie ni negi) star of all season ! Only Nora can do that! And this is not only coming from me but from the director himself, Ismael Bernal! “Minsan may isang gamu-gamo” actually, this movie is much more on social relevance than acting ng mga artistang involved. The picture theme was so huge and you don’t need big names like her but that doesn’t stop Nora from stepping up on stage to recieve her best Actress trophy and This was best picture that year! Among her best were “Tatlong taong walang diyos”, “Ina ka ng Anak mo”, “Atsay” this was the most controversial award because they gathered all the best actors and actresess in a leading role in just one title, the best performer award! Dito niya binanggit ang pamosong linyang” Mamay , mali ang hula nila!” The movie” BONA” was not bad. I guess, it wasn’t as realistic and acting-challenged as “Atsay” people watched this movie only because of her and its director late Lino Brocka. “Himala and Banaue” were so huge because of its cast and budget. Again, you will watch these movies because of her screen presence and how she managed to manipulate the admiring fans to watch her over and over again without ever feeling sorry and regret,,,, and that’s how we love her. The movie “Merika”, there was a scene from that movie na ang galing-galing niya talaga! Nakaupo lang siya sa isang bus at naka-tanaw sa bintana, facial expression shot lang ito pero you don’t need any lines to read and feel what she is really trying to emote. Yung panghihinayang at galit kay bembol rocco na minahal lang siya nito dahil sa “Green Card” and the fact na minahal na rin niya ito! Minsan, nabanggit ni Ms. Armida segion-reyna na kapag si Nora ang kaeksena mo humanda ka na dahil ang mata nang taong yan ay buburahin ang memorya ng linya mo!!! ‘Yung latest movie niyang made in U.S. hindi ko pa napapanood and i’m not expecting much. Pero yung “Naglalayag” I did watched it and frankly, from what I heard and this is coming from Vilmanians (and what did you expect from them!) the, “Lamay scene”, that was Nora’s touch. the kind of acting that only her can truly aspires, touched and magnificently project what that particular scene requires her to do! And she did it touched-down! (as always!) Magkaroon man nang mga Star of all season, Megastar. diamond star at kung anu’t ano pang mga klaseng star. Iisa lang po ang orihinal na nagkaroon ng titulong may star at yan po ay ang aming natatangi, namumukod at nag-iisang Superstar na si Ate Guy, Miss Nora Aunor! – MBA Jr.

Sagot Ng Isang Vilmanian:

Fan mentality, paano mo aalisin ito kung ang tatanungin ay kung sino ang mas magaling umarte si Nora o si Vilma. Magmula pa lamang ng pagkabata’y namulat na ako sa kahusayan ng pagganap ni Ate Vi. Ganuon rin naman marahil ang mga tagahanga ng sa kabila. Mahirap alisin ang katwirang lalo pa’t nakasalalay ang pangalan ng dalawang aktres. Pero kung tatanggalin lamang natin kahit pansamantala lamang makikita na ang katotohanang nalagpasan na ni Vilma ang sinasabi nilang numero unong superstar lalo na sa pag-arte. Hindi ang aktres ng mga darna o wonder vi kundi ang aktres na naglakas ng loob na itapon ang sweet image at yakapin ang naiibang imahen na nagpasubok ng kanyang galling simula sa pagtanggap niya ng mahamon na papel sa Burlesk Queen. Sinabi niya sa kanyang sarili, Oo wala akong gintong boses pero marunong naman akong sumayaw. At kasabay nito’y handa kong tanggapin ang mga matatapang na papel na hindi kayang sikmurain ng mala-berhen na imahen ni Nora. Kasabay nang pag-ungos ay ang sunod sunod na patok sa takilya kasabay rin nang mga mapag-hamong pelikula katulad ng Relasyon, Broken Marriage at Sister Stella L. Sunod sunod na pelikulang pinarangalan ng Urian ng mga manunuri ng pelikulang tagalog. Hindi na nga siya ang sinasabing “poor second” sa sinasabi nilang superstar. Kung tutuusin siya na ang dapat tawaging superstar ngunit hindi ito ang ninais ni Vilma, patuloy pa rin niyang hinubog ang kanyang talento sa pagganap. Sabi nga ni Charito Solis, mas magaling si Vilma sa pagganap dahil sa mas versatile ito kaysa kay Nora. Totoo ka dahil hindi lamang mga martir na role ang puedeng gawin ni Vilma, puede rin siyang maging bida contrabida, puede rin siyang maging senyorita o atsay o kaya pamartir na asawa o kabit. Samantalay napako na si Nora sa mga pamartir na papel. Ito marahil ang dahilan kung bakit kalian lang sinabi ni Elizabeth Oropeza na mas magaling umarte si Vilma kaysa kay Nora dahil sa walang pinagbago ang pag-arte ni Nora. Totoo ito samantala’y sinabi rin ni Boots Anson Roa na si Vilma may iba’t ibang klase ng pag-iyak. Mayroon tumutulo lamang ang luha parang patak lang, meroong umaagos sa pisngi at meron namang parang gripo sa pagpatak. Ganyan kahusay si Vilma kung umiyak. Samantala ang pag-iyak ni Nora’y hindi nabago. Sa mga ilang pelikula kailan lang masyadong nagasgas na ang pagpopokos sa kanyang overrated na mata para lang masabing magaling siya sa pagganap. Ilang beses nilang pinopokus ang kamera sa kanyang mga mata para masabing super galing ni Nora. Kahit na ang maging sukli naman nito’y magsuffer ang buong pelikula. Kung hindi ang i-exploit ang mga mata’y ang pagbibitiw niya ng mga salita’y makaka-distract ng mga eksena. Bawa’t kataga’y mayroong diin sa dulo na ginagawang katatawanan ng mga komedyante dahil nga sa hindi napipigil ng mga director ang kanyang nakagawiang pag-arte. Samantala si Ate Vi ay nahasa na sa mga kilo-kilometrong linya sa mga pelikula niyang pawang kumita sa takilya. Matatandaan duon sa eksena na nagsasalita siya sa harap ng kanyang ama na patay na sa Burlesk Queen, sinabi ni director Celso Ad Castillo na pinipigil ni Leopoldo Salcedo na hindi maiyak. Hindi siyan dapat umiyak dahil patay na siya sa eksena pero mahirap itong gawin dahil nadala siya ng husto sa tuhog na dialouge ni Ate Vi. Mga tuhog na eksenang pagganap ito ang sikreto ni Ate Vi na nagpatumba kay Elsa. Marahil halos lahat ng mga tangahanga ng kabila ang nagsasabi na bakit napataob si Elsa ng Himala ni Marilou ni Ate Vi sa Relasyon. Isang eksena lang ang kasagutan. Ito ay ang death scene ni Christopher DeLeon na tuhog na tuhog meaning hindi nagkaroon ng cut ang ginawa ni Ishmael Bernal hinayaan niyang umarte si Ate Vi ng walang putol at ang naging resulta ay ang napakahusay na pagsasalarawan ng biglang pagkamatay ng mahal mo sa buhay. Walang pokus sa mga mata, at walang OA na pagi-emote ng lines. Walang “hayup” o “my brother is not a pig” na line kundi tuloy tuloy na pag-iyak. Dahil ito ang makatotohanang pagganap hango sa tunay na buhay. Kung sa tunay na buhay naganap ang Ina Ka Ng Anak Mo nang mahuli mo ang sarili mong ina’y inasawa ang sarili mong asawa wala na ang pa-emote na oa na acting na “hayup, hayup” kungdi sa tunay na buhay sabunutan na ang mangyayari. Iyan ang dahilan kung bakit pinataob ng Relasyon ang Himala ng kabila. Hindi hango sa tunay na buhay ang pagganap ni Nora sa Himala. Samantalay si Marilou ay tutuong tao. Hango sa tunay na tao ang ginawang pagganap ni Ate Vi. Mabalik tayo sa present time, makikita sa huling pagtutunggali ng dalawa sa mga awards ang Mano Po 3: My love versus Naglalayag. Kitang kita ang ebidensiya na hindi nagbago ang akting ni Nora. Hindi niya nabigyan ang justice ang role ng isang mayamang judge. Sa pagsasalita at pagkilos. At muli sa sinasabi nilang “burol” scene hindi makatotohanan ang page-emote niya na parang nagkaroon siya ng epilepsy. Samantala si Ate Vi from the start to finish nakikita mo na sa pagsasalita’t pagganap ay makikita mo si Lilian, isang Chinese na nalilito sa pag-ibig. Kung iisipin natin mahaba na rin ang nagdaan upang tignan natin ang “body ofwork” ng dalawang aktres. Surin mo man makikita mo ang lawak ng kaibahan ng mga pelikula ni Ate Vi kumpara sa mga pelikula ni Nora. Kungbaga, na-stock na si Nora sa mga apiapihan roles. Samantalay si Ate Vi hanggang ngayon highest paid aktres dahil sulit lagi sa takilya at laging may kakaibang pinapakita sa kanyang mga pelikula. Ilang dekada na ang lumilipas at ang kinang na kanyang bituin ay nanatiling makinang samantala sa kabila halos wala nang kinang, Sino kaya ang dapat sisihin? – RV

 

Awards Summary: Nominations were not counted here, both actress received numerous citations and nominations.

Nora’s Awards Tally
• Manunuri’s Urian Awards – 6
• PMPC’s Star Awards – 4
• Film Academy of the Phils. – 5
• MMFF and MFF – 9
• Catholic Mass Media Awards – 2
• Young Critics Awards – 4
• FAMAS – 5
• International Awards – 4
• Pasado – 1
• Gawad Tanglaw – 1
• Davao City & Bacolod City Film Festival – 2
Total Awards: 42

Vilma’s Awards Tally
• Manunuri’s Urian Awards – 8
• PMPC’s Star Awards – 7
• Film Academy of the Phils. – 4
• MMFF and MFF – 5
• Catholic Mass Media Awards – 2
• Young Critics Awards – 2
• FAMAS – 6
• International Awards – 2
• Pasado – 3
• Gawad Tanglaw – 2
• Gawad Suri – 2
• Cebu City and Bacolod City Film Festival – 2
• San Beda College Awards – 1
• Let’s Talk Movies Awards – 1
Total Awards: 47

RELATED READING:
Official Web-site: Vilma Santos Recto
Official Web-site: Nora Aunor ICON
Facebook: Vilma Santos Recto
Facebook: Nora Aunor
Nora & Vilma No Longer a Rivalry (a special magazine)
Boxing Matches 1/7
Vilmanians and Noranians Surveyed
About “Larawan” and Nick Joaquin
Nora at Vilma sa Gitna ng Basura
Very Long Rivalry (Repost)
May be the Philippines’ best film actress of all time 1/3
Vilma-Nora Then, Nora-Vilma Now (Repost)
Sino ba talaga ang mas mahusay umarte, si Vilma o si Nora?