FILM REVIEW: ADULTERY AIDA MACARAEG


The Plot: Dreaming to be released from her miserable life of poverty, Aida, a waitress, abandons her bedridden father, her moralistic mother, her jobless brother and her good-for-nothing sister to live with her boyfriend Carding, who she believes will save her from her miserable life. In his desire to earn quick money, Carding gets involved with illegal drugs and is jailed. Aida is pregnant and while Carding is in jail, she has an abortion. She then marries another man. Carding is released from prison and finds out about his wife’s new life. He decides to sue her for adultery. – UP (READ MORE)

Aida Macaraeg’s only dream is to be released from her miserable life of poverty. She is sick and tired of working day and night as a waitress to be able to feed her jobless brother and his family, her good-for-nothing sister, moralistic mother and bedridden father. One day, Aida decides to turn her back on them and settles for a live-in arrangement with her boyfriend Carding, who gives her a short-lived salvation. But her first attempt to escape a misfortune only brings her face to face with one after another. Carding gets jailed for drug peddling. Aida finds out she is pregnant and opts for an abortion. Forced by need and fueled by ambition, she lives with a wealthy man and has a son by him. Carding is released from prison and finds out about his wife’s illicit affair. They finally see each other again, in court. – Database of Philippine Movies (READ MORE)

Aida Macareg (Vilma Santos) works as a waitress in a restaurant and is the lone breadwinner of her family. She goes berserk every time she comes home to an uncooperative sister, a jobless brother with a kid and a pregnant wife, a moralistic mother and a bedridden father. Aida longs for release from her situation. Her boyfriend, Carding (Phillip Salvador), still has to finish college. He acts as courier for Bombay (Rene Hawkins), a drug dealer, who is also into other illegal activities. He is made to promise to avoid Bombay, but the need for money keeps him going to him for odd jobs. One day, Aida turns her back on her family and asks Carding for a live-in arrangement. They move into an apartment they could hardly afford. He now depends on Bombay as their means of livelihood. He is able to buy appliances for her — and Aida is spared from working. However, Carding is caught red-handed and is implicated in the shooting of a policeman. Aida goes back to work as a waitress. She visits Carding regularly in prison. She discovers she is pregnant. They decide to get married. Carding is sentenced to fourteen years in prison. Aida realizes she cannot bear the child in her reduced circumstances. She opts for an abortion. Her sister, Miriam (Deborah Sun), tells Carding she had a miscarriage. In the restaurant, Aida meets Tito Pangilinan (Mario Montenegro) who is smitten with love for her. He is frank. He has a wife and three grown-up kids. Aida does not tell him the truth. Carding is transferred to Davao. He writes several letters to Aida but they are not answered. One day, he is told that his sentence has been commuted. After seven years, he is finally free and starts to look for Aida. He hears stories from his aunt but does not believe her. He is able to track down Miriam who, caught by surprise, gives him her address. It is a shocked Aida who meets Carding. She says she is keeping house for Miriam’s lover and child but this only makes him doubt her. The pieces do not fit and Carding discovers that the boy, Alvin, is Aida’s son. The relationship with Tito Pangilinan is revealed and Carding thinks the son is his. Upon the instigation of his aunt, Carding sues for adultery. Tito is disgusted with Aida’s lies and removes their son from her care. He wants him spared from the trauma of the forthcoming trial. The trial finally descends on the protagonists. The marriage is dissected; the past recalled. The question of his paternity props up, but Aida states to Carding’s chagrin, that he is not his child. His baby was aborted due to her hardships. The lawyer tells Aida that the trial will be resolved in Carding’s favor. She is advised to beg him to drop his suit so that she might be reunited with her son. She visits him in his aunt’s house but he is cool to her request. During the day of the verdict, Carding announces that he is withdrawing the lawsuit. Days later, Carding brings Alvin to his waiting mom. It seems he told Tito he would drop the case if he returns Alvin to her. Carding has now accepted the sad facts of the situation. He is leaving for Cebu where he will be in charge of some agricultural lands. Aida thanks him profusely. – Lino Brocka: The Artist and His Times, Posted by Video48 (READ MORE)

The Reviews: Adultery (Aida Macaraeg Case No. 7892) is not one of filmmaker Lino Brocka’s best works. It definitely cannot be lined alongside masterpieces like Tinimbang Ka Ngunit Kulang (You Were Weighed But Found Wanting, 1974), Maynila: Sa Mga Kuko ng Liwanag (Manila in the Claws of Neon, 1975), and Insiang (1976). At best, Adultery is a well-made melodrama that puts a social issue, that of marital infidelity as escape from poverty, at the center of its affairs. Jose Javier Reyes’ well-crafted screenplay (the story is credited to Aida Sevilla Mendoza) is supposedly sourced from a real life account, but one wonders if convenient happy endings (which the film unfortunately struggles with) exist in these kind of cases, especially ones as emotionally charged as in the film. In the Philippines, adultery cases stretch for years and any emotion resembling marital love and concern is replaced with scorching hate, the primary ingredient that fuels litigation. Aida (Vilma Santos giving a very mature performance) is the sole breadwinner for her family, consisting of a bedridden father, a nagging mother, a good-for-nothing brother, his unemployed wife and baby. Unable to bear the hardships of living with her family, she takes the offer of her boyfriend Carding (Phillip Salvador) to simply live together, resisting his invitation to marry him despite the possible scandal that might arise out of their living arrangement. Carding gets caught peddling prohibited drugs and gets imprisoned, leaving Aida all alone to fend for herself. Years later, Carding gets released from prison and finds Aida, now a mistress of a wealthy executive (Mario Montenegro) and mother to a child that is not his. Aida is then sued for adultery by Carding, which if she is proven guilty would separate her from her son.

There’s one sequence in the film which clearly shows Brocka’s mastery. Aida visits Carding in prison, telling him of her pregnancy. Carding again offers to marry her, fearing that their child would be a bastard child. Supposedly out of pity, Aida agrees. The marriage is solemnized then and there. The prison chaplain officiates the ceremony where Aida is draped in an ordinary dress while Carding wears the orange colored uniform. Around are the witnesses of their marriage, felons all donning the same orange outfit Carding is wearing. Of course, these are mere background details, emphasizing the sullenness of the event that is ordinarily jovial and lively. Brocka concentrates on Aida. He closes up on her face, worried about the uncertainty of her future: she is after all pregnant and now married to a convict with absolutely no source of income. It is Aida’s point of no return and Brocka understands it as such, thus he presents it with understated elegance; no dialogue, just Lutgardo Labad’s swelling music and Brocka’s emphatic close-up of Vilma Santos’ apprehensive face.

The film attempts to criticize marriage, which is depicted not in its traditional sense (as the key to life’s bliss) but as a harrowing cage where women are left with no choices. It seems to advocate infidelity, especially when the requirements of life overtakes the facile concerns of societal and religious norms. Interestingly, Brocka does not antagonize any of his characters. Aida is a hardworking woman who we first see as the selfless sufferer who is charged with her family’s survival, a mere victim of fate and circumstance. Also, one cannot doubt Carding’s affection for Aida. His decisions in life may have been off, leading to his incarceration and Aida’s continuing suffering, but it cannot be denied that his love for his wife is indubitable. The blame does not go to any person but to the social institution of marriage, its sometimes shallow roots and the unbendable veneration the law and society gives to it to the detriment of the unique needs of individuals. I am impressed as to how Brocka directed the courtroom sequence, without the usual pomp and unnecessary drama. The courtroom sequence gives the impression as to how the justice is bookish and blind to personal plights. One lawyer asks Aida a question, and she shies away saying that the question is too personal. Of course, the judge demands that she answer the question, which she does so unwillingly. In the eyes of the law, emotions, circumstance, fate, and needs are denied materiality. This should have been the instance wherein we’ll fall for Aida’s plight: that despite her being guilty for adultery, she does not deserve to be punished because she was forced to infidelity not by innate evil but by circumstances in her life. However, instead of dishing out an ending that would operate as the culmination of such criticism, Brocka and Reyes decided to succumb to sentimentality. Husband forgives wife. Wife gets her son back. Everybody’s satisfied. Unfortunately, reality, which the film tried so hard to emulate, isn’t anything like that. – Oggs Cruz (READ MORE)

Dalawang pelikula ni Vilma Santos ang napanood namin sa special previews: Adultery at Sister Stella L. Pinatunayan ng mga pelikulang ito na Vi is still the leading actress of the season and performances in both movies make her again the actress to beat in next year’s award derbies. No doubt, Vilma, right now, is at her peak. Adultery is a well made melodrama deftly written by Jose Javier Reyes and masterfully directed by Lino Brocka. Ang pangunahing tauhan, si Aida Macaraeg, ay isang dalagang breadwinner ng kanyang pamilya. May sakit ang kanilang ama at siya ang bumibili ng mga gamot nito. Nag-asawa nang maaga ang kapatid niyang lalaki at siya ang nagpapakain pati sa asawa t anak nito. Siya rin ang nagpapaaral sa bunso nilang kapatid na babae. Receptionist sa isang restaurant, may boyfriend si Aida na wala namang regular na trabaho. Ito ay si Carding (Phillip Salvador) na kumikita lamang kapag sumasama sa mga illegal na gawain ng sangganong si Bumbay. Nang malaman ni Aida na nagdadalantao na naman ang asawa ng kapatid niya, niyaya niya si Carding na magsama na sila. May kapatid si Aida na isinumpa ng kanilang ina dahil nakisama ito sa isang lalaking may-asawa. Si Aida lamang ang nakauunawa kay Miriam (Deborah Sun) at wala siyang kamalay-malay susundan pala niya ang mga yapak nito. Akala niya’y malulutas ng pagsama niya kay Carding ang mga problema niya ngunit lalala lamang pala ito. Nahuli si Carding sa pagsama sa pangkat ni Bumbay at nabilanggo. Naiwang nagdadalantao si Aida. Nang malaman ito ni Carding ay pinilit siyang pakasal na sila para hindi maging bastardo ang isisilang niya. Ikinasal sila ng pari sa piitan.

Nagbalik si Aida sa kanyang trabaho ngunit natuklasan ng may-ari na buntis siya. Naiisip ni Aida na lalo lamang siyang maghihirap at nadadamay pa pati ang kanyang magiging anak kung itutuloy niya ang kanyang pagbubuntis kaya t ipinasya niyang ilaglag ito sa tulong ni Miriam. Nang magaling na siya y napasok siyang tagapamahala sa isang kantina at dito niya nakilala si Tito Pangilinan (Mario Montenegro). Nagsama sila at nagkaroon ng isang anak. Si Carding naman ay nalipat sa Davao Penal Colony at nagtaka na lamang siya nang huminto na sa pagsulat si Aida. Lumaya si Carding pagkaraan ngpitong taon at hinanap agad si Aida. Nakita niya ito at si Aida ay nagsimulang maglubid ng buhangin. Ang batang kasama niya’y anak daw ni Miriam at mahigpit ang bagong kinakasama nito kaya’t hindi sila maaaring laging magkita. Ngunit natuklasan ni Carding ang katotohanan at sa galit nito’y sinaktan si Aida. Inihabla siya ni Carding at ang kaso y humantong sa husgado. Mabibilanggo kaya si Aida sa salang adultery? That, you’d have to find out for yourself. Mawawala ang suspence kapag ibinunyag namin agad sa inyo ang ending.

Based on a true legal story, nagawa nina Reyes at Brocka na very convincing ang pagkakalahad ng kuwento. Maingat ang development at talagang magsi-sympathize ka sa mga tauhan. Ang kaso ni Aida ay isa ring moral dilemma. Dapat ba siyang sisihin sa kanyang ginawa? Sa kanyang paglalaglag sa sanggol and finding the easy way out through having an affair with a rich old man? Maraming katulad ni Aida sa ating lipunan sa ngayon. Nagipit sila, humanap ng lubid na makakapitan upang huwag tuluyang mahulog sa bangin, kasalanan ba ang kanilang praktikal na solusyon sa kanilang mga problema? Morally, masasabi agad na mali nga sila. Pero madaling humusga kung hindi ikaw mismo ang nakaharap sa mga problemang iyon. Tao lamang si Aida. At ang kahinaan niya ang siyang dahilan kung bakit naging very human ang istorya ng Adultery. Kung bakit naging tutoong-tutoo angmga sitwasyon at ang lahat ng characters dito. Alam mong melodramatiko ang kuwento pero alam mo ring nagaganap ang gayon sa tunay na buhay, na talagang maraming Aida Macaraeg sa ating paligid. Namumukod-tangi ang mga aspetong teknikal ng pelikula: ang sinematograpiya ni Conrado Baltazar, ang musika ni Lutgardo Labad, ang editing ni Rogelio Salvador, ang disenyong pamproduksiyon ni Joey Luna at pati pagkakalapat ng tunog.

Mahusay rin ang acting ng lahat ng tauhan: si Deborah Sun bilang Miriam, si Anita Linda bilang ina, si Tita de Villa bilang tiyahin ni Carding. Maikli lamang ang papel ni Mario Montenegro bilang Tito pero epektibo ang pagkakaganap niya, lalo sa tagpong sinumbatan niya si Aida: “Pitong taon na kitang tinutulungan at pitong taon mo na rin akong niloloko.” Napakahusay ni Vilma sa mga eksenang nagngingitngit siya sa mga kapatid niya sa pagkawala ng uniporme o muling pagbubuntis ng mga ito. You can really feel the sense of rage, and futility that she is experiencing. Pero maging sa iba pang quiet scenes ay mahusay rin siya, o kaya y maging doon sa eksenang muntik na siyang mabuko ni Mario, at nang magkomprontasyon na sila ni Phillip. Pero, sa tingin namin, mas lumutang si Phillip sa pelikulang ito at tiyak na in the running na naman siya for best actor next year. Kung minsan ay mata lamang ang kanyang pinaaarte at wala siyang dialogue (like nang mabasa niyang nakunan si Aida o nang makita niya itong sinasalubong si Mario sa gate). Very touching din ang final scene na tinanong siya ni Vi: “Ano ng nangyari sa ‘tin?” At sumagot siya ng: “Huwag mo nang itanong. Baka mas masakit kung malaman natin ang sagot.” Maraming iba pang magagandang touches ang pelikula, tulad ng pagdalaw ng mga babaing taga-block rosary kina Aida at ang sagutan sa court scenes.

The movie also offers another view of prison life. Sa mga pelikulang lokal na tungkol sa piitan, karaniwan nang nalalagyan ng tattoo ang bida, ginagahasa ng kapwa bilanggo at ginugulpi ng husto. Dito, maayos ang naging kalagayan ni Carding habang nasa bilangguan at wala siyang naenkwentrong mga problema na gaya ng usual na napapanood natin sa prison movies. Maganda talaga ang Aida Macaraeg. – Movie Review by Mario E. autista Movie Flash May 31, 1983 – Mario E. Bautista, Movie Flash May 31, 1983 (READ MORE)

“…Masinop ang mga elemento ng pelikula sa Adultery (Regal Films, Inc., 1984). Madulas ang daloy ng dulang pampelikula ni Jose Javier Reyes, konsistent ang disenyong biswal at sinematograpiya, malinis ang editing, akmang-akma ang tunog at musika. Ang maalam at matatag na pagganap ni Vilma Santos ay nagsasaad ng pagkaunawa at metodo sa layuning dramatiko ng kanyang pelikula. Ang pagganap ni Phillip Salvador bilang Carding ay nagpahayag ng mithiin sa lahat ng di magkatugmang aspeto nito at nagbigay ng naiibang sigla sa tradisyon ng pagganap sa pelikula. Sa halip na unidimensiyonal ang pagsasalarawan sa karanasan ng isang babae ay binigyan ito ng maramihang posibilidad sa pamamagitan ng sinematikong pagsasadula ni Lino Brocka, ang istereotipong ito ay isinalaysay sa paglalakbay ng kababaihan tungo sa sariling pagkilala at katuparan.” – Jojo Devera, Sari-saringng Sineng Pinoy (READ MORE)

Walang Himala (Repost)

“I’m Home!” Ito ang unang katagang namutawi sa bibig ni Batangas Governor Vilma Santos-Recto sa ibinigay na presscon ni Mother Lily Monteverde para sa kanya at sa asawang si Sen. Ralph Recto last Wednesday night sa Imperial Palace Suites.

Bilang gobernadora ng Batangas, priority na ni Ate Vi ang pagsisilbi sa constituents kesa sa pag-aartista, aminado siya talagang nami-miss niya ang showbiz lalo pa nga’t dito na siya lumaki, nagdalaga, nagka-asawa, nagkaanak hanggang sa maging public servant.

Bukod sa mag-asawang Vi at Ralph, kasama rin nila ang anak na si Ryan Christian. Hindi na raw nakasama ang panganay ng Star for All Seasons na si Luis Manzano dahil may trabaho, pero early that night, magkasama sila dahil pareho silang tumanggap ng award sa Gawad Tanglaw – si Vi for Best Actress sa In My Life at si Luis ay Best Suppoting Actor for the same movie.

After the open forum, tsumika na ang entertainment press kay Ate Vi kung saan ay sinagot niya ang maraming issues at katanungan.

She was asked kung ano ang masasabi niya sa pagtakbo ng ex-husband niyang si Edu Manzano bilang vice president — isang posisyong kinumpirma niyang inalok sa kanya pero tinanggihan niya.

“Alam niyo, si Eduardo, noong huli kasi kaming nag-usap, ang alam ko, senador ang tatakbuhin. Baka in a way, may pagkabigla ‘yung desisyon na vice president kaagad.

“Hindi madali ‘yon, eh. Pero as I’ve said, may feeling naman ako na kung mabibigyan siya ng chance to serve, definitely, he will do so because he is efficient, matalino, competent.

“Pero ‘yung klase ng kampanyahan ngayon, hindi talaga ganu’n kadali. So, kung anuman ang magiging desisyon ni Edu, hindi ko siya masisisi. Politics is not easy,” pahayag ni ate Vi.

Natanong din siya hinggil sa pagbabalik sa ‘Pinas ng kanyang arch rival, ang Superstar na si Nora Aunor, at sa kanyang reaksyon sa ginawa nitong pagpaparetoke.

“Hindi lang naman ang kumare ko ang gumawa niyan, marami pang iba. Not for anything, mas bata sa amin, nagpapaayos na.

“There’s nothing wrong with that. Kung sa tingin mo, eh, kailangan na, bakit naman hindi? Walang masama na i-enhance mo ‘yung beauty mo, ‘di ba?”

Hinggil sa pagbabalik ni Ate Guy, ani Vi, welcome na welcome ito sa kanya.

“Oo naman! At saka noong magkaroon kami ng premiere night sa L. A. ng In My Life, nagkakausap kami niyan. Dapat nga manonood siya, eh. Kaya lang, biglang nagkaroon ng bisita sa kanila. Kaya ang pinapunta niya, close friends niya, which we accommodated, at nag-thank you siya. “

Tungkol naman sa paggawa ng pelikula, ani Vi, may natitira pang dalawang pelikula sa kontratang pinirmahan niya sa Star Cinema.

Ang isa ay ang pelikulang pagsasamahan nila ni Sharon Cuneta at ang isa ay hindi pa raw alam kung ano.

Tuloy pa rin ba ang pagganap niya bilang Cory Aquino sa filmbio nito na ipo-produce ng Star Cinema?

“Alam niyo, gustung-gusto kong gawin ‘yan. Wala na yatang honor sa isang artista kung hindi ang makaganap ng isang Corazon Aquino.

“Kaya lang, depende ‘yan. Kasi kung gusto na nilang gawin right away para mahabol sa death anniversary at birthday ni Presidente Cory, hindi ako pupuwede,” say pa ni Ate Vi.

Ipinaliwanag din ng gobernadora kung bakit mula sa Lakas-Kampi-CMD ay lumipat silang mag-asawa sa Liberal Party ni presidentiable Noynoy Aquino.

“Maybe, naghahanap na rin ako ng pagbabago, eh. Whether sabihin man nila na parang ginagamit ang magulang, eh, bali-baligtarin man natin, magulang niya talaga ‘yon na dalawang bayani. Kahit na sabihin niyong ginagamit lang, magulang niya, eh.

“Naniniwala ako na kung naghahanap tayo ng pagbabago with the vision na binanggit niya sa amin na tutulungan niya ang Batangas, we’re not saying overnight, may resulta ‘yan, walang himala. Talagang tatrabahuhin ‘yan, may vision ‘yan.

“Pero let’s face it, mag-iisip ka siguro ng dalawa, tatlo hanggang isang daang beses bago ka gumawa ng kalokohan. Kasi, sisirain mo ba nang ganu’n-ganu’n lang ang dalawang magulang mo na bayani?

“Plus, his vision, looking forward na ‘I believe,’ meron pa, kaya pa nating maka-survive. ‘Yun nga lang, may mga bagay tayong dapat i-strengthen, and one of these is corruption talaga. ” – Vinia Vivar, People’s Journal (Telebisyon.net).

MOST MEMORABLE PERFORMANCES (Videos)

When it comes to memorable performances only one actress top my list. Five decades, from being a child phenom to an a-1 caliber actress, Vilma Santos is no doubt the Meryl Streep of the Philippines. And maybe more. Maybe because Ms, Streep, didn’t start her illustrious career as child star.

Vilma Santos endured so many transformations that even Madonna will be pale in comparison. Of course, Vilma is not a singer but Madonna can’t even followed-up her half-decent excursion as Evita. Just a little trivia, Vilma tried successfully to be a singer with her golden album “sixteen” in the 70s but practically decided dancing was her forte hence the successful venture into television musical variety show “Vilma!” in the 80s to 90s. Vilma with her bountiful filmography is second to none. She did a wide variety of roles that even her closest rival can’t match. Listing her most memorable performances is a chore. It will take a true follower to figure out which one should be included in the list. And of course everyone have their favorites particularly Vilmanians who I am dedicating this article.

The fact is Vilma’s closest rival, Nora Aunor who repeatedly ventured into a string of comeback vehicles since the mid 90s failed miserably to capture her lost sparkle. And the fact that her brand of acting have never came to its fruitful evolution since the 70s. Meaning – she became stagnant. As an actress in order to have longevity, one should adapt to changes. Sadly, Nora never learned this concept.

Clearly, if you will list Nora’s best, it will all be films in the 70s and early 80s. Movies like Tatlong Taong Walang and Bona. While Vilma’s list will be from the past five decades. A proof that like Ms. Streep she evolved into much more versatile and serious actress than anyone else in Philippine cinema.

While Vilma is active in public service, film and TV producers are waiting for her availability; and corporate institutions are still lining up for her endorsements. All of these, of course made her still the highest paid actress/product endorser of the land. Should we change her title to the LONGEST REIGNING QUEEN OF PHILIPPINE CINEMA? You be the judge…

Here’s my list of most memorable Vilma Santos performances…

Trudis Liit (1963)The year…an actress was born! Vilma acted like she’s been doing this craft for a long time eclipsing the dramatic tandem of Luis Gonzales and Lolita Rodrigues. Her most memorable scenes were with villainous Bella Flores which secured her winning the FAMAS best child actress of 1963!

Dama De Noche (1972) – Vilma did 14 films this year and only six were musicals which means her career backers are starting to shift her into a more serious brand of acting. It was also evident that the musical genre was in that stage of phasing out. And Vilma embraced this by accepting a variety of projects from comedy (Ang Kundoctora), a light drama (Bernal’s Inspiration), action (Takbo Vilma Dali), horror (Hatinggabi Na Vilma) and drama (Tatlong Mukha Ni Rosa Vilma and Dama De Noche). Vilma’s portrayal of a twin sister in which one was insane in Dama De Noche signaled her willingness to take new daring projects seriously. This Emmanuel Borlaza melodrama showcased her ripe talents which earned her first best actress award. It maybe not be a full victory for some since she tied her best actress award with Boots Anson Roa but for many it was an honor to share this award to a veteran like Ms. Roa. Ms. Roa later on will confess her admiration for Vilma. She also went on to an extreme degree of explaining Vilma’s brand of acting, her different types of crying. Going back to Dama De Noche, the last scene where Vilma was showed crying and laughing like a true lunatic at the same time came to my mind. This alone, deserved the FAMAS statue all the more.

Lipad Darna Lipad (1973) – The most successful Darna film of all time. Vilma became the standard measurement of success for future Darna. The film was directed by three directors, all successfully gave us three different take on good versus evil, all with three scariest villain portrayed by three multi awardees veterans, Gloria Romero (babaeng impakta), Lisa Lorena (babaeng Lawin) and Celia Rodrigues (babaeng ahas).

Vilma despite her being the shortest darna in history compensate her height with her bubbly almost animated movements which made this film true to its form, like an action hero marvel comics! All the fight scenes minus the high tech computer generated sequences are done the old fashion way, via camera tricks. Even the flying scenes were not bad at all like, I said, considering the medium, they have to use back then.

Ordinary moviegoers will not even think of including this film as one of Ate Vi’s most memorable film/performance but for me, this is one of a good example how versatile Vilma is, even at the start of her illustrious career.

Here’s my list of most memorable Vilma Santos performances…

Tag-Ulan Sa Tag-Araw (1975) – All I can remember about this film was Ate Vi’s last scene in a car with her parents controlling her and Christopher De Leon chasing them in the street while rain falls down. A very melodramatic to some and yet very effective. Ate Vi’s portrayal of a girl who happens to be in love with her first cousin was commendable. She should have won an acting award for this. But of course, critics are all intoxicated by her popular nemesis back then. Falling in love with your first cousin was taboo back then and maybe still taboo in Philippine society today, Tag-ulan was the first film of Christopher De Leon and Vilma Santos. And it clearly show the chemistry between the two actors.

It was the most dramatic and down to earth film by director Celso Ad Castillo. Here there is no over the top production design like the one in Pedro Penduko or the overtly sexual innuendo of Pinakamagandang Hayup sa Balat ng Lupa or even a sexual vulgarity of Virgin People. It was a love story based on a real life situation which made the film more realistic.

Of course being a Castillo project, one can’t escape some creative adventure… like the trend back then, Ate Vi did a the “wet look”. Meaning she done a scene where her blouse got wet and you know what that means. To some, it was vulgar, to many, It’s like she’s testing the water. Will her fans accept her in a more mature daring roles? No more sweet image?

Apparently, we will get more of this “testing” in her strings of films like Nakakahiya 1 & 2 (where she did a two-piece bikini) and Nagaapoy Na Damdamin among others. Her next move will shock the local cinema not even her closest rival can replicate. A transformation of great maneuvering. And this time, another Castillo project…

Burlesk Queen (1977) – The test was over. Vilma Santos, the mature A-1 caliber actress has arrived. And she did it with a big bang.

Burlesk Queen became not only the top box office grosser of the 1977 Metro Manila Film Festival, it also became the most awarded. It got 10 awards out of 13. Like typical sour losers, complaints flew and a big scandal came where the press reportedly said the awards were being returned to the festival organizers.

No such thing happened in fact Ate Vi still possessed the medallion and award she received as the festival’s best actress.

For movie critics, Vilma’s portrayal of not so innocent Chato was so revealing even her opponent’s regular drumbeater came to Ate Vi’s defense saying her acting was surprisingly good enough to win the award.

Truth is, even the feminists applaud her matured performance and Times magazine couldn’t agree more, they featured Ate Vi in a short article, the very first for a Filipina actress.

For a shocked Vilmanians, this movie became a revelation that indeed Ate Vi is embracing her independence. She no longer the sweet virginal teen star of the late 60s to early 70s. She is now an actress willing to conquer any roles. And Vilmanians embraced this transformation with pride. Vilmanians are now ready for Ate Vi’s resurgence on top. We are all ready to support her no matter what the other camp will say.

As for her acting in the film, she proved once again that she has the goods. Critics noticed her multi-dimensional portrayal of a woman in pain. Her reluctant choice to survive poverty. Her father’s condemnation of her career choice. Her lover’s abandonment. All of these emotions captured into a superlative acting coup, surprising even her rival and her fans.

Pagputi Ng Uwak, PagItim Ng Tagak (1978) – Following up the success of Burlesk Queen, Celso Ad Castillo ventured into another love story with the backdrop of hukbalahap. It was a common knowledge now that this film costs Vilma and her film company a lot of money. This was due to Celso Ad Castillo’s lack of control over his film budget. His moody and lack of restrain took this film longer to finish. Later on, VS film company did not recuperate its huge capital, as the film was only a mild hit. Despite this, the film was applauded by critics and won Vilma numerous award as producer.

As Julie Monserrat, a music-loving provincial lass raised by her two prudish, wealthy spinsters aunt (Adul De Leon and Angie Ferro), Vilma convincingly portrayed a woman who was very much in love with Dido Ventura (Bembol Rocco), the poor son of embittered woman (Mona Lisa). Like its earlier love story, Tag-ulan sa Tag-araw, the couple have its struggle to remain together.

Aside from the beautiful scenery, Castillo did a wonderful job of combining poetical music to its scenes. And who can forget that kiss? It was said that Celso asked both Vilma and Bembol to put some condensed milk in their mouth prior to do the kissing scene. This was to signify their lust and love to each other as both have to control their desire as what most common in the Filipino society back in that period of time.

Rubia Servios (1978) – For many Vilmanians, Rubia Servios wasn’t given any recognition its truly deserved. Particularly the performance of Vilma Santos. It was a difficult role. A rape victim who managed to fight back at the end and killed her tormentor. Lino Brocka’s first film with Vilma. And he did it with careful manipulation of grief and emotion. A not so good director will falls into melodramatic scenes but Lino manages to showcase Vilma’s vulnerability with restraints with his carefully selected scenes.

The twists at the end where Vilma was once again being raped by the devilish Philip Salvador this time in front of Vilma’s husband played effectively by Mat Ranillo III was brutal and painful to watch. Vilma’s defeat at the hands of Philip was clearly expressed by her lack of facial emotion and then at the nick of time, when she was able to grasp a piece of wood, a paddle in that boat scene, her face was ignited by terror. She showed revenge in her face and moviegoer will root for her. Kill that bastard! Kill that bastard! One might say.

It was a hell of performance. One might assured her winning the best performer of the 1978 Metro Manila Film Festival. But we were all wrong. We were robbed. It was a painful night for many Vilmanians. I wasn’t able to eat and sleep even the following days after the awards night. Vilma accepted her defeat and learned never to expect any more come future awards night. And so, all Vilmanians did that too. Life is too short to cry over a spilled milk.

Miss X (1980) – Filmed on location in Amsterdam, Netherlands, Miss X was a triumph for its director Gil Portes. It was like seeing a dark European film.

Vilma Santos was exposed in a glass window at the red light district of this part of the world. These scenes alone deserve its being included in my list. A very brave act indeed for an actor who was never been to a place where actual sexual trade between people are legal.

Gil Portes showed his masterful skills pre-Munting Tinig fame. Miss X was dark and moody at the same time which made the exposition of a life of a Filipina illegally recruited as prostitute in this country revealing and disheartening.

Ex-Wife (1981) – Perhaps Eddie Rodriguez’ best film as director, Ex-Wife was actually a psychological drama about marriage and its players. A woman who became victim to a series of bad relationships.

Vilma showcased her acting maturity by portraying a bruised woman. Her scene in the end was reminiscent of Dama De Noche but this time, more restrained and controlled. She was seen, loosing her composure, crying and then laughing in a dinner table. She was a picture of defeat. Another wonderful performance too bad nobody took notice.

In 1981, Vilma did four movies, Hiwalay, Pakawalan Mo Ako, Karma and Ex-wife. Pakawalan earned Vilma a FAMAS best actress while Karma gave her another Metro Manila Film Festival best actress. Of the four movies, she did, I believe Ex-Wife should be the one deserving of any awards not Pakawalan (although she’s really good in her court scene there) and not Karma.

Relasyon (1982) – So many times snubbed by the critics, Vilma Santos emerged out of nowhere as the new darling of award giving bodies via Ishmael Bernal’s poignant take of a story of a mistress in Regal films’ Relasyon.

Prior to this, local films always stereotyped the mistress roles as the villain. Never in the history of local cinema that a societal taboo, the life of a mistress can be portrayed in a down to earth, very sympathetic way, only now in Relasyon.

Vilma Santos did a splendid job as Marilou, an independent, insecure, career woman who happened to fell in love with a chauvinistic, egocentric, typical Filipino married man. It was apparent that Relasyon was a Vilma Santos vehicle and Christopher knows this and did a wonderful job supporting her leading lady.

Perhaps the most memorable part of Relasyon was the death scene of Christopher. The scene wasn’t edited in parts but a continuous take from the shot where Christopher fell to the floor to Vilma’s marathon cry. The outcome was exhilarating. What a splendid decision for Bernal to take that scene as normally called in Philippine Cinematic lingo as “tuhog.” After this scene, Vilma’s look was that of a woman at peace with the outcome of her life. Her tired face indicates pain and we felt it too.

Vilma’s performance here was so realistic that even her rival’s epic portrayal of Elsa in Himala was a no match. And we rejoice. She deserve all the awards. No one complained. No awards being confiscated. Vilma finally got her recognition she truly deserved.

Sinasamba Kita (1982) – Before Meryl Streep did a wonderful job as the bitches of all bitches in the movie the Devil Wears Prada, Vilma Santos did a similar type of role. Produced by the house of glossy films, Viva and directed by Eddie Garcia, Sinasamba Kita broke all the local box office records at that time. Proving that by 1982 not only Vilma was the darling of all award-giving bodies, she was also the box office queen!

Derived from a comic serial, Sinasamba Kita contained so many twist and turns that one might have a headache just figuring out what happens next. But to the credit of Garcia, he was able to make all the twists into a realistic, acceptable ones that midway to the film we are all rooting for Nora (Lorna Tolentino) and hating her bitch sister Divina (Vilma Santos).

We are also amazed by the glossiness of the film’s locations (houses) and Vilma’s sophisticated dresses. All this made the film more credible and realistic. By the time, Divina gave way to her sister’s love for Christopher we also made amends and felt sympathy to the bitchy heiress. Making this film and Vilma’s performance a proof of her versatility as an actress that her rival will never – ever achieved.

Broken Marriage (1983) – Bernal at his finest. This was our conclusion after seeing Broken Marriage in 1983. And this time the roles of Christopher De Leon and Vilma Santos were even. Meaning unlike Relasyon which was a one-woman show, Broken Marriage was a two persons story. From the point of view of a man, a husband and a woman, a wife. As the title said, it was a marriage destined for failure. The numerous arguments here about marriage life was carefully written with wit giving both Christopher and Vilma shining moments.

As we are talking about Vilma here, I will concentrate on her, she did portray a woman looking for some justice in this unequal world of men and women in Philippine society. She even willingly did a scene where she doesn’t have any make-up on and the result was a realistic glance of a real life Filipina whose struggles were being exploited very realistically by Bernal.

Vilma effectively did a wonderful job that the Manunuri, the local critics, gave her second consecutive Urian Best Actress.

Sister Stella L (1984) – Most established local directors lined up for their turn to direct her, in Sister Stella L, It was Mike Deleon’s turn. And it was one of the most celebrated film of all time. And this was despite its disappointing result at the box office, Lily Monteverde, the producer of Regal films consolation was the numerous awards SSL earned.

And Vilma’s performance here did not disappoint both the critics and her avid fans. Her take on SSL’s awakening was somewhat lacking in hysterics as what her critics always says, she’s always has the hysterical brand of acting. Here, Vilma’s acting was controlled and restrained even her speech scenes at the rallies were calculated. And these made her performance more effective transcending her character bit by bit from an innocent bystander to a militant activist.

SSL was invited to the Cannes Film Festival in 1984 but due to technical problems the films wasn’t showed in there but at the Venice Film Festival which was equally prestigious. At the Venice, SSL was the second Filipino film after Genghis Khan in 1951 to be officially invited for exhibition.

Tagos Ng Dugo (1987) – originally offered to Maricel Soriano, Tagos proved to be another tour de force performance from Vilma Santos. The film was about the psychological state of being of Pina and her sexual needs that’s ends with her desire to kill her sexual partners. A study of mental state where Pina needs to change her physical looks each time she venture into manhunt.

Vilma exposed herself into different characters. Each bate to a possible sexual mate ends into an erotic sex scenes and its graphic death scenes. Vilma did a good job of portraying an psychotic murderer. But perhaps the most visually effective scenes wasn’t that of the ending where she was finally caught by the authorities, it was the quiet scenes in the dirty bathroom while she’s sitting in the toilet bowl and where she took her slipper and slap a cockroach that was crawling in the ground. The shots started from the ceiling and then zoomed down. Then her face was seen smiling at her latest killing -the cockroach. It was a symbol. That’s just like killing men.

Directed by Maryo DeLos Reyes, Tagos Ng Dugo may not be your typical Vilma movies. It was dark and very violent. It was another testament of how varied Vilma’s filmography is. She won two major awards for this, another best actress from FAMAS which elevated her into FAMAS hall of famer and another best actress from CMMA.

Pahiram Ng Isang Umaga (1989) – As the dying Juliet Vilma Santos gave us another tour de force performance. I know, I have said this line so many times in this article but what can I do? It was indeed another tour de force performance. As the premises of this film was already gloomy, about a cancer victim who died at the end of the film, some mediocre director will fall into a soap opera technique but not Bernal. It was the last Bernal-Santos collaboration before Bernal’s sad demise. Bernal successfully controlled Vilma’s tendency to overreact to dramatic scenes. On Vilma’s part it wasn’t that hard, this was 1989 she already matured into a fine a-1 caliber actress.

Most of Vilma’s scene here were really toned down. It’s like her tears where even choreograph falling down in her cheeks at the right moment. When she talked to the father of her child, asking him to take care of him, her voice trembles with regret and pain at the same time tears falls like in perfect connection to each words she delivered. Pahiram earned Vilma her first Star Award from PMPC. It took her nine years to finally earn their respect. Not surprisingly, PMPC consists of so many fans/reporter of her rival. Nowadays, Vilma has the most Star Awards (six compare to four for her rival). How times changes… for the better.

Ipagpatawad Mo (1991) – It was a different diversion from a company who was known for comics adaptation and glossy commercial movies. Finally, Viva films produced a serious film with a simple story. A story with a social message. Ipagpatawad mo penned by Olivia Lamasan and directed by Laurice Guillen was a story about a couple with an autistic child.

Autistism is a neurological condition that affects children in their early developments. The story focuses on the couples struggles with opposites views in how to deal with this misfortunes. The shame attached to it affects the typical Filipino manhood and the unconditional love typical of a caring Filipina woman hood. Another triumph for Christopher DeLeon and Vilma Santos. Christopher shared the spotlight as the insecure husband with the ever-consistent acting of Vilma Santos.

Dahil Mahal Kita (1993) – Another film with social relevance was this powerful true to life story of a woman who was the first person to publicly admit her sickness of AIDS. Typically stereotyped as gay’s disease, Dahil Mahal Kita tackled the ignorance of many Filipinos regarding this disease. Once again, Laurice Guillen gave us an realistic approach to story telling. She chronicled the life of Dolzura Cortez from her early life as a happy go lucky prostitute to the last stage of her life of giving a face to this deadly disease with a careful hand. Each stages gave us the reason to be compassionate.

Vilma Santos gave a powerful, angry performance. Her delivery of lines were crisped. Her emotion overflowed with question about Dulzora’s mortality, about god’s plan and about the people who will read or see Dulzora’s life story. All of these were convincingly seen in Vilma’s Dolzura.

Bata Bata Paano Ka Ginawa (1998) – re-titled as Lea’s Story for international release, Bata bata paano ka ginawa was one of the most successful film of 1998. That was in terms of critics response and box office returns! Bata was based on the award winning 1983 semi autobiographical novel of Lualhati Bautista. Bautista updated the novel to have a more fresh take.

With a superb cast which includes the irresistible Serena Dalrymple as Maya (she reminded us of that child star in the film, the Goodbye Girl), the very innocent Carlo Aquino as Ojie and of course the men in Lea’s life, Albert Martinez, Ariel Rivera and Raymond Bagatsing. Like many Vilma Santos starrer, Bata bata paano ka ginawa was of course belongs to Vilma. She has become the most effective actress in Philippine cinema. Her choice or roles made her the feminists’ kind of woman and ordinary Filipinas’ role model. Roles that yes, struggles… and vulnerable.. .but roles that shows resistance and fighting spirits.

Bata bata paano ka ginawa was showcased Vilma’s maturity as an actress. A proof that she was indeed in command of her choices of roles. Two traits that has never seen in her closest rival. Bata earned Vilma her first international recognition from the prestigious Brussels International Independent Film Festival.

Anak (2000) – The most successful film at the start of the new millennium in terms of box office returns and critical acclaimed. Anak, directed by Rory Quintos was a story of a domestic helper in Hongkong, Josie Agbisit, played masterfully by Vilma Santos and her family headed by her eldest daughter, Carla, played by Claudine Barretto. The story focuses on the mother and daughter relationship.

Two decades ago, Vilma Santos played an ungrateful daughter to the multi awarded veteran, Charito Solis in a drama titled Modelong Tanso. The films was a big disappointment even with the exploitation of Charito slapping Vilma in the face as their promotional stills.

Now comes year 2000, Vilma nows plays the role of the mother and Claudine as the spoiled brat daughter. Yes, there was a scene where the mother slap her daughters face in Anak but Star Cinema who produced it were smarter. They didn’t exploit these scene instead they promote the film as a story about typical Filipino family. The story was the selling point why Anak became one of the most successful film of Star Cinema and Vilma Santos.

Of course and again, despite the excellent performance of Claudine Barretto, Anak belongs to Vilma. And again, It was a tour de force from start to finish.

Dekada 70 (2002) – Chito Rono’s take on the forgotten 70s and the effects of the Marcos dictatorship in the Philippine society, Dekada 70 turned out to be a realistic adaptation of the lives of typical family back then. It features an excellent cast and performances particularly Vilma Santos and Piolo Pascual. Dekada was originally offered to Nora Aunor but for some reason it didn’t materialize. Following the success of Bata, Bata Paano Ka Ginawa, another lualhati Bautista opus, Dekada was offered to Vilma and accepted the project without any hesitation and despite the fact that she wasn’t the first choice for the role of Amanda Bartolome.

As Amanda Bartolome, Vilma Santos delivered an understated, profoundly moving performance deserving of all the awards. Vilma was once again showed here without make-up. Her scene in a room where she’s holding her son’s clothing after the burial of her son was so moving we couldn’t help but cry our hearts out.

All in all, the film (again) belongs to Vilma. Her transformation here from a bystander mother and wife at start to the end where she became a militant activist was so unexpected that we were convinced that her sufferings made her who she was at the end. Dekada earned Vilma her second international recognition. There. What’s in your list? – RV

FEMINISM


“Vilma Santos, cited for achievement in acting, could not make it to the awards-giving rites due to other commitments that had to do with her “real-life” role as mayor of Lipa City. She requested instead Boots Anson-Roa of the Mowelfund, who also sat on the Advisory Committee of The “F Festival,” to read her response for her. Here’s what Vilma had to say: “I wish I could personally accept this award, but I have to honor my commitment to my constituents which I can’t turn my back on or delegate to my staff. Nevertheless, I would like to convey my deepest gratitude to the organizers of the Feminist Centennial Filmfest for honoring me with this award. And I would like to share this award with those women who dare transport to screen characters, stories and issues about women. Our movie producers like Ms Lily Monteverde who daringly produced the movie, “Sister Stella L”; Ms Charo Santos-Concio who chose me to portray the role of a mother in “Dekada ’70,” “Bata, Bata, Paano Ka Ginawa?” and “Anak”; the scriptwriter of these movies, Ms Lualhati Bautista; director Laurice Guillen who directed the movie, “Dahil Mahal Kita”; Marilou Diaz-Abaya, too; and other female directors and co-workers in the film industry. Through their works, they brought to public attention a wide array and range of problems confronting women, how they courageously, daringly and intelligently cope with and face them, thus, raising the consciousness of our women, helping them gain a deeper understanding of their life and situation and acquire, to borrow the phrase of a film critic, the ability to control their lives and make choices of their own. Who else could best empower our women except our women themselves? May our women therefore continue to play a more active role in advancing the cause of women and in building a better quality of life for our countrymen! Maraming salamat po muli. At mabuhay ang ating kababaihan!” – Rina Jimenez-David, Inquirer, Dec 09 2005 (READ MORE)

“Relasyon was the only film with three screenings at the on-going Pelikua at Lipunan last March 3, 2006. No other films hold this record. We were enthusiastic about the students who reviewed the film of more than two decades. Talagang relevant and timeless ang theme at plot ng nasabing pelikuka at maituturing na isa sa great films of Philippine Movie history. Before the screening of the film ay masaya kaming nag-uusap and at times our attention was called sa mga updates and or instructions ni Jojo Lim for the next group activity like March 8 sa U.P. sa Cine Adarna para sa Diwata Awards kung saan ay confirmed na darating si Ate Vi who is one of 4 distinguised honorees. Tumigil lang kami ng magsimula na ang screening. Wala ka ng makausap pa. Nakatuon lahat sa pelikula. Animo’y mga magagaling na kritiko ng gawad Urian na magre-review ng nasabing pelikula sa unang pagkakataon?! Hmp. For the film’s final highlight, we all sat in real silence. Motionless. Then, the expected tour de force/acting coup cum real drama essayed by Ate Vi. Her solitariness remained absolute in this particular scene with her heart wrenching monolgue. Then I thought I caught a glimpse of some of our co-Vilmanians wiping away “precious tears” in between sobs. Several more moments passed in silence. Tinapos namin ang panonood ng pelikula with an ovation. ’Di lang kaming mga Vilmanians ang pumalakpak! We hope ay nakapag-contribute ang mga Vilmanians in support of Mowelfunds worthy projects. Mabuhay Ms. VILMA SANTOS The Philippines Movie Queen For All Seasons. Mabuhay Vilmanians around the globe.” – June Sison, 5 Mar 2006 (READ MORE)

Once again, the wind wafts yet another welcome scent of victory for the Philippines Movie Queen and Star for all Seasons at the Feminist Centennial Festival at the Cineplex, Shangri-La Plaza last night. She is indeed a national treasure. We belong to thousands of Filipinos who wish for her to be the next National Artist of the land. Lately, we hear that it will be a choice between her and the late FPJ. For sure, the numerous or countless recognitions, honorary doctorates, lifetime achievements and this latest honor given by the NGO-GO Feminist Centennial Media Committee and the Communication Foundation for Asia cemented Ate Vi’s stronger bid to clench the National Artist title. And if this happens, yan ang talagang “heaven!” The awards night was by invitation only.

Against our better sense, we tried our luck and waited on cue. There is reason to be optimistic. Our beloved Ate Vi is one of the 6 distinguished honorees. Having prior commitments with her constituents in Lipa, we believe that there must be a representation in her behalf. And our patience paid off. We were accommodated by the working committee at the reception. We proudly introduced ourselves as member of Vision and VSSI (Vilma Santos Solid International). Present to witness the ceremony include Eric, Noel, Al, Zaldy, Paulo and myself. We were a small contingent occupying a better section of the theater against the batallion of diehard Noranians, how did this happened?! Ms. Boots Anson Roa accepted the trophy (in her her behalf) and read the passionate and meaningful thank you message of Ate Vi. some insights. I am posting some of the write-ups included in the festival programme: 6 reasons to celebrate we salute six icons of Philippine cinema…for their invaluable contributions to the film industry…for being legendary…and passionate about their art… and for being women.

Marilou Diaz-Abaya, director. Despite the risks of being categorized as a “woman’s director,” Marilou Diaz-Abaya staked her claim on the genre with the trilogy of films – Moral, Brutal and Karnal – that explored the realities of women’s lives and challenged social mores and rigid expectations of women. In the decade of political turmoil and rapid social change, Diaz-Abaya’s films, while anchored in intensely personal stories, enlarged upon the intimate limits of women’s lives to raise sharp and cutting questions about Philippine society and gender relations, thereby triggering debate, discourse, and ultimately, the transformation of the Filipina’s sense of self and her situation. Lualhati Bautista, screenwriter. Known for creating strong, independent women characters asserting their autonomy and engagement in the society, Lualhati Bautista has given today’s women compelling role models to provide alternative modes of behavior, attitudes, and relations. At the same time, she uses the women’s stories as prisms on the political and social condition illuminating and reflecting women’s realities and aspirations in all their vivid color and artist to make films that combine artistry and innovation with commercial viability and social commentary. Through Star Cinema, Santos-Consio has shown that it is possible to meet the demands of commercial cinema without compromising one’s commitment to quality and to delivering meaningful and compelling stories. Lily Yu-Monteverde, producer. Has been “mother” to the Philippine movie industry in so many ways.

Through the last four decades, she has produced more than 200 movies, some of them born of her own stories, most shaped by her sensibilities ans instincts for what the market wants and demands. Even as the Philippine movie industry struggles out of the doldrums, “Mother” Lily continues to make movies simply because, as she declared at the recent ceremony, she “loves the movies.” Even as she kept Regal Films profitable with commercial offerings that covered almost all genres, “Mother” Lily also paid back her debt to the Philippine cinema by financing and allowing the country’s foremost film artists to create works that today endure as some of the best Filipino movies ever made. Nora Aunor, actor. Though “icon” is today a much-overused word, to call Nora Aunor an “icon” of Philippine movies would not be an overstatement. From her beginning as a singer and pop idol, Nora tapped unexpected reserves of experience and sensitivity to transform herself into an excellent actor, in the process acquiring a body of work that includes some of the finest movies of “Golden Age” of local cinema in the 1970’s and 1980’s, particularly Himala, Tatlong Taong Walang Diyos, Ina Ka ng Anak Mo, and Bona. Vilma Santos, actor. From the moment she allowed herself to break out of her “teen-idol” persona in Burlesk Queen, there was no stopping Vilma Santos in her search for artistic maturity and challenge. In the process, she has dared take on roles that could have potentially marred her image but instead provided her depth and complexity as an artist while strengthening her appeal at the box office. The designer-sculptor’s words. According to Julie Lluch: “the feminist struggle is not so much about equality as it is about the power and freedom to be truly woman and truly human. Being a woman is to know herself as diffrent and separate, beautiful and free. As she taps the wellspring of the spirit within, she is ready to leap and soar to a fully creative life – a life she share’s with man, with whom she builds the kind of world they both want for themselves and their children.”

At the conclusion of the program, seriously or half in jest, we shook hands and congratulated Ms. Charo Santos-Consio and Director Marilou Diaz-Abaya. We proudly introduced ourselves and averred that the occassion would have been more meaningful and significant had Ate Vi made it to the event and personally accepted her trophy. We told Director Marilou that we are only a small representation of the Vilmanians. We were thrilled and happy when she raised her hand and told us “count me in!” She asked us to extend her regards to Ate Vi and that she truly misses her. Congratulations to all the distinguished honorees most especially to our beloved Ate Vi! Mabuhay po kayo and God bless. To the men and women behind the Feminist Centennial Festival and other affiliations and cooperating groups, our heartfelt gratitude and Mabuhay po kayong lahat! – June Sison, V Magazine, Issue No 5 (READ MORE)

Vilma-Nora-Vilma-Nora-Vilma-Nora

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Vilma-Nora-Vilma-Nora-Vilma-Nora – There were/are movie queen rivalries such as those of Glora Romero/Nida Blanca, Susan Roces/Amalia Fuentes, Rosemarie Sonora/Gina Pareno and today’s Judy Ann Santos and Claudine Barretto. BUT none can compare to the legendary and never-ending (?) battle royale of La Santos and La Aunor, Ate Vi and Ate Guy to their fans. It is a very long rivalry that has divided the Philippines and cuts across all sectors, genders, sexual orientation, even the intelligentsia and the literati, the high and the mighty, including Presidents and public officials, and up to the grassroots level, even the fans’ grandchildren and great grandchildren.

Who Is The Better Film Actress? – Before Relasyon (1982) and even after Burlesk Queen (1977), the movie that liberated Vilma from Nora’s shadow and that made the critics began to look at her as a serious actress, Nora Aunor was the Critics’ Darling. She was ‘the standard where her contemporary actresses will be measured.’ She earned this birth right via her quiet performances, where she made use of her soulful eyes that speak volume. She was the Queen of Restraint, in the league of Lolita Rodriguez, her senior counterpart. They were the quiet counterparts of the verbose and volcanic Vilma Santos and Charito Solis. Ms. Aunor could hold you at the palm of her hands with her tour de force performances that wowed local and foreign jurors in such films as Tatlong Taong Walang Diyos, Bona, Himala and Ina Ka Ng Anak Mo (her best performance ever). She was ahead of her time. The critics won over, she would be at the top of the best actress surveys of all time, with Vilma Santos, Lolita Rodriguez, Hilda Koronel, Charito Solis and Gina Alajar trailing her.(DGPI, journal/tabloid data). The Bicolana superstar would send fellow superstar Vilma and others home as she collected trophies from the critics’ groups the Urian and PMPC Star, as fish does water. Her films Himala and Bona were getting rave reviews internationally and she almost won her first international trophy for Himala at the Berlin Film Festival by a mere vote (fans’ website). She was at the top of her game. She could do no wrong. Lupita Kashiwahara (Inquirer): “Nora Aunor will sit down in a chair and you can have 10 different emotions coming out of her. She’s that good. I still honestly believe that she’s one of our national treasures,” she gushes. Vilma Santos, her chief rival both at the box-office and acting supremacy contest, was an also ran, playing second fiddle to the talented singer/actress.

Nestor Torre elucidates: “In those days, it looked like Nora could do no wrong. Even if she made quickie films, they would win awards over Vilma’s better-executed starrers. After years of this unfair competition, Vilma decided to stop playing the also-ran, and opted to essay the roles that Nora preferred not to do—the other woman, rape victim, burlesque dancer, etc (Inquirer).

Butch Francisco further clarifies: “It took long for Vilma Santos to be recognized as a serious actress. Although she won a major acting award – 1972 FAMAS Best Actress for Dama de Noche (she tied with Boots Anson-Roa) – ahead of Nora Aunor, it was the latter who first became the toast of the critics, the members of the Manunuri ng Pelikulang Pilipino in particular. Unlike Nora Aunor who only has to use her eyes to convey emotions, Vilma’s early performances were often hampered by her soft features and rather thin voice.” (Philippine Star)

The turning point was the 1978 MMFF where Vilma (Rubia Servios) was predicted to win for her more “technically difficult role” says Manunuri Isagani Cruz in his review (Urian anthology, book 1), lost to Nora (Atsay) for the best performer award. Vilma took her biggest defeat to heart. After that fateful night, rumors had it that she was suicidal, inconsolable, depressed and vowed not attend awards ceremonies anymore. The next thing we know, she was up against Nora again in the 1979 MMFF where it was a lopsided affair. Nora, in her best performance in years as a barren wife and daughter to Lolita Rodriguez in Ina Ka ng Anak Mo tied with the other queen of restraint for best actress. Vilma’s tardiness on the set of Modelong Tanso with costar Charito Solis (this was their ill-fated entry to the 1979 MMFF to square off with the Lolita/Nora tandem) irked her Tita Chato big time that on one occasion, as the paparazzi allegedly reported, La Solis brought her best actress trophies on the set and told Vilma: “kaya mong tapatan yang mga trophies na iyan?” True or not, the gesture from a more professional, experienced actress Chato probably was to stir up the 1979 Box-office Queen to straighten her act if she wants to remain on top and beat the competition. The two divas however became close friends and would work together in Vilma’s award-winning films Ipagpatawad Mo and Dolzura Cortez. Ms. Solis’ highest regards for Vilma was revealed when she told the media point blank that “Vilma is a better actress than Nora.” (Ricky Lo, Philippine Star). Meanwhile, Nora continued her winning streak via Bona. Directed by Lino Brocka, the movie was a big hit at the Cannes film festival and earned Nora her second Urian trophy. Vilma remained the box-office queen but the critics’ stamp of approval eluded her. Vilma pondered these things in her heart. She regrouped. She had a career/talent inventory and soul-searching.

Mr. Torre (Inquirer) continues: Vilma’s “sexy” movies were more suggestive than anything else, but they gave her a new screen persona that made her a distinct movie entity from Nora. Fact is, Nora could also have played sensual characters, but she felt awkward doing so, and Vilma benefited from her reticence. In time, Vilma was also winning acting awards and starring in big hits, so the competition between her and Nora peaked. Then, in the 80s, Nora’s personal problems affected her career, while the more professional Vilma became producers’ actress of choice. Nobody doubted Nora’s talent, but Vilma had talent “and” professionalism, so she soon streaked in front of her archrival. No longer did she compete in areas where she was “dehado,” like singing. Instead, she stressed her dancing ability, sensuality and versatility, and truly came into her own. Mr. Francisco (Philippine Star) concurs: -But through hard work and determination- plus her collaborative efforts with top directors like Ishmael Bernal, Celso Ad Castillo, Lino Brocka and later, Mike de Leon, Laurice Guillen, Marilou Diaz-Abaya and Chito Roño, she became one of the greatest actresses of Philippine cinema.

Vilma may have reached the level of superstardom on a stack of materials with the so-called “commercial appeal,” but along the way, she also chose scripts that tackled social issues and oftentimes was experimental with her roles. The other woman part she portrays in Relasyon may be sympathetic, but in our society the mistress is still the much-hated third party in the break up of most marriages. Vilma, however, risked playing that and in the process was rewarded with the first of her four sets of grand-slam win in the various local award-giving bodies. In Sister Stella L., she plays an activist nun in a picture that doesn’t allow her to have romantic scenes that are rudimentary in most movies. Sister Stella L. may have bombed at the boxoffice, but it is listed among the finest in the history of local films and gave Vilma the third of her eight Urian trophies. But she was most commendable when she decided to accept the films Pahiram ng Isang Umaga and Dahil Mahal Kita (The Dolzura Cortez Story) because fans don’t want their screen idols to die in the movies. During the past six years (when she was already the mayor of Lipa City), she already had the full luxury of accepting only the film projects she fancies.

Actually, she only made four films during this period: Bata, Bata, Paano Ka Ginawa?, Anak, Dekada ‘70 and Mano Po 3: My Love. Except in Mano Po 3, where she is always fashionably dressed, she allows herself to be de-glamorized in her more recent films, at an age when most movie queens would rather be photographed through gauze or any gadget today’s modern technology could provide to erase those tell-tale wrinkles and lines. Fortunately, she always seems to be making the right choices. And the tables have turned. Nick Joaquin reveals Vilma’s secret weapon (Vilma, The Glad Girl): “What’s Vilma’s secret to remain on top?” Ishmael Bernal, who claims to have directed Vilma’s best pictures, believes she has endured because she has physical, emotion and mental endurance. She could work for 24 hours straight without getting tired, without flagging in her acting. There were times when we had to shoot for three or four successive days, getting very little sleep, but there Vilma would be: fresh, enthusiastic, rarin’ to go. Physical endurance is very important to a star. Another thing I noticed was her strong sense of competition. At that time, though of course, she didn’t say so, it was Nora she wanted to beat. Vilma was out to be the bigger star, the better actress. And so she geared her career for a zoom to the top.”

Lino Brocka who directed her in three of her most applauded vehicles: Rubia Servios, Adultery and Hahamakin Lahat tells Nick Joaquin (Vilma, The Glad Girl): “When you work with Vilma,” says Brocka, “you get this feeling of having just emerged from a bath and of being drenched all over with Johnson’s baby cologne. You feel so fresh, so youthful.” He adds that when they first worked together she seemed scared of him. Now he gushes: “Ang sarap niyang katrabaho.” The chief reason, of course, is: “She has matured and grown up as an actress. At this point of her career, she is very good, she is really big. Before, she had a hard time making herself cry, but now how fast she can do it. And she has become sensitive to direction: in that respect she has overtaken Nora.” Brocka says that the sensitivity he noticed at once in Nora Aunor was what he missed when he started directing Vilma. “So I assumed that, as an actress, she was really just second to Nora. But Vilma takes good care of herself not only physically – there’s always this aura about her – but intellectually too: so she grows and develops tremendously. The second time I worked with her, in Adultery, I realized she had become as good as Nora, or better. And by the time of Hahamakin Lahat there was the complete sensibility already – a difference in the way she expressed pain and hurt. Talent was welling out like spring water, and flowing from her most naturally, no longer courtesy of Vicks or whatever.” Flash forward to the present: From all angles such as box-office clout, talent fee, producers’ choice, net worth, longevity, public perception and respect, and successful dual careers, it seems that Vilma has the upperhand.

It is in the Battle for Acting Supremacy that the two are several notches superior vis-a-vis their senior and junior movie queen counterparts. Their very long rivalry as acting divas is characterized by almost hairline, marginal and/or split votes by film scholars and critics and the general public such as the Gore/Bush 2000 Presidential Election results. While occasional, inconclusive surveys would put Nora on the top over second placer Vilma (DGPI, tabloids), National Awards groups such as the National Artist Award and the U.P. Film Institute’s Gawad Plaridel have considered her nomination, with the latter (Gawad Plaridel) crowning her their winner as Outstanding Film Practitioner in 2005.(U.P. Film Institute, various websites) Vilma versus Nora in the major leagues – Head to head stats The thesis is not complete without discussing the two great actresses’ head on collisions in acting jousts where tension almost always ran high during awards nights and with their respective fans standing by their idol win or lose.

1972 – Nora (And God Smiled at Me) beats Vilma (Dama De Noche) at the Quezon City Film Festival. Score: Nora, 1; Vilma, 0.

1973 – Vilma (Dama de Noche) tied with Boots Anson-Roa (Tatay na si Erap) to beat Nora (A Gift of Love) at the FAMAS. Score: Vilma, 1; Nora, 0.

1975 – Vilma (Nakakahiya?) clobbered Nora at the Bacolod Film Festival (Banaue) for best actress. It is still a puzzle why Nora’s Best Actress list (NA website) includes the Gawad Buglas award/best picture (Banaue) as a ‘best actress win’)? Score: Vilma, 1; Nora, 0. (See by the numbers secion)

1978 – Nora (Atsay) was the Best Performer, beating Vilma (Rubia Servios) and company. Vilma and Nora (both nominated for Ikaw Ay Akin) lost to Beth Bautista at the Urian. Vilma (Pagputi ng Uwak) and Nora (Atsay) both lost to Susan Roces (Gumising Ka, Maruja!) at the FAMAS. Score: Nora, 1; Vilma, 0.

1979 – Nora and Lolita Rodriguez (Ina Ka ng Anak Mo) clobbered the Vilma/Charito Solis tandem at the MMFF for best actress. Score: Nora, 1; Vilma, 0.

1982 – Vilma single handedly won her first of four Grand slams for Relasyon over Nora (Himala) at the Urian, FAP and the CMMA, and over Nora again (Mga Uod at Rosas) at the FAMAS. Score: Vilma, 4; Nora, 0.

1984 – At the first PMPC Star Awards, Nora (‘Merika , Condemned, Bulaklak sa City Jail) edged Vilma (Sister Stella L. and Aida Macaraeg) for actress of the year. They were the only nominees for best actress. Nora won the most votes for ‘Merika over Vilma’s Stella L. A case of split votes? At the Urian however, Vilma (Sister Stella L.) beats Nora (‘Merika, Bulaklak sa City Jail). Another case of split votes? At the FAMAS, Nora (Bulaklak sa City Jail) and Sharon Cuneta (Dapat Ka Bang Mahalin?) tied to beat Vilma (Sister Stella L.). Score: Nora, 2; Vilma, 1.

1989 – Vilma (Pahiram ng Isang Umaga) bested Nora (Bilangin Ang Mga Bituin Sa Langit) at the PMPC Star Awards, her first of 6 best actress trophies. At the Urian, the rivals tied for best actress for the same movies. Score: Vilma, 2; Nora, 1.

1990 – Nora (Andrea) won over Vilma (Hahamakin Lahat) at the Star Awards and the FAP; over Vilma (Kapag Langit ang Humatol) at the Urian. Score: Nora, 3; Vilma, 0.

1991 – Nora almost had a grand slam for Pacita M. when she won at the FAMAS (Vilma is already a Hall of Famer), and over Vilma (Ipagpatawad Mo) at the FAP and the Star Awards. At the Urian, Vilma (Ipagpatawad Mo) halted Nora’s trip (Pacita M.) to the Grand slams. Score: Nora, 2; Vilma, 1.

1999 – Nora Aunor was the only actress cited in the CCP Centennial Honors for the Arts. No documentation or any proof would show if Vilma Santos was also considered for the award. The CCP, the MMFF and the National Commission for the Arts (which selects the NAA nominees, with the eventual winner to be selected by the President) are all government-run awards bodies. Nora joined actors FPJ and Dolphy for the honors, in what many consider an Erap Circle of Friends who heavily campaigned for his bid for President. Published reports also showed that Erap gave Nora a house as a token of gesture for helping him win the presidency in 1998. He would later be deposed via the Edsa People’s Power and replaced by then Vice President Gloria M. Arroyo for plundering the country’s wealth and is currently under house arrest and awaiting trial. Score: not applicable.

2004 – Nora (Naglalayag) bested Vilma (Mano Po 3) at the PASADO awards, tied with Vilma at the Gawad Tanglaw awards and lost to Vilma at the Star Awards. At the Urian where they were both nominated for Naglalayag and Mano Po 3 respectively, neither one won. Judy Ann Santos (Sabel) went home with the trophy. Nora, 1; Vilma, 1.

2005 – Nora was eliminated during the initial deliberation for the coveted U.P. Gawad Plaridel Award wherein Vilma eventually won over National Artist nominee Mike De Leon and National Artist Awardee Eddie Romero. Score: Vilma, 1; Nora, 0. (See U.P. Gawad Plaridel’s citation for 2005 winner Vilma santos).

2006 – Nora and Vilma were both nominated for the National Artist Award but were eliminated in the first round. FPJ was the eventual winner, who was chosen by sitting President Gloria M. Arroyo over finalists Mike De Leon and Manuel Conde.

Total head-to-head winner: – Vilma, 10, over Nora, 7. Very close indeed. Of course, Nora’s fans will protest as I did not include minor award groups, especially the U.P. YCC where Nora is the favorite in whatever movie she appears in, such as Inay. Interestingly, Nora bested Vilma once while Vilma got more votes than Nora three times at the Urian. At the FAP, Nora shut out Vilma three times to Vilma’s one; at local film festivals, Nora beats Vilma three times to Vilma’s one; they are even at the FAMAS, 1:1; at the Star Awards Nora’s ahead with, 3, Vilma, 1, although at the Star Awards, although overall, Vilma has six to to Nora’s four actress of the year awards; PASADO, Nora, 1, Vilma, 0, although Vilma won there three times (see By the Numbers section). – Mario O. Garces (READ MORE) Special Magazine DOWNLOAD HERE

UPDATE 2013: – As of January 2013, Nora Aunor collected three trophies – 2 International best actress and her 8th MMFF trophy, all for the indie film, “Thy Womb.” She is now predicted to earn more local trophies come award seasons in the Philippines, (And in the process will probably equal or even surpass Vilma’s domination in acting trophies). Meanwhile Vilma Santos has earned several recognition as well, this time the Presidential Lingkod Bayan award for her work as public servant. In terms of film, her only film project, “The Healing” last year was a smash commercial success reaching the 100 million in box office revenue. Both veterans are making waves, Nora with her coming television project on TV5 entitled “Never Say Goodbye” and Vilma with her planned indie project entitled “Extra.”

ARTICLES - Very Long Rivalry 1970s - 1973 3RELATED READING:

Remembering Nida Blanca

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Appeared as an Extra – “…In his research, Celso discovered that before Korea, the then teenager Nida appeared as an extra in three movies: Manuel Conde’s Siete Infantes de Lara (shown on April 17, 1950), Sampaguita Pictures’ Umaga na Giliw (shown on June 18, 1950) and Balintawak Pictures’ Kundiman ng Luha (shown on July 13, 1950). Nida was screen-tested on Oct. 6, 1950 by LVN Pictures where she reigned as queen for more than a decade, doing mostly comedies opposite the late Nestor de Villa and later, when she turned freelancer, branching out to dramas which won for her more acting awards (one of the most unforgettable being Lino Brocka’s Miguelito in which Nida played the estranged mother of a baby-faced Aga Muhlach)…” – Ricardo F. Lo (READ MORE)

Goddess of the Moon – “…Akong pinakamagulo sa mga extra. During shooting breaks, ginagaya ko ‘yung mga dialogue na hindi makuha ng ibang artista. In a week’s time, Dona Sisang saw me in a still picture as one of Mila’s friends. I was holding a birthday cake and she asked daw Mr. Generoso kung sino ‘tong babaing ito. Pinatawag ako agad sa bahay niya. My mother and I went. Nagpagawa na pala ng kontrata. I’d get P500 for my first two pictures at pataas gradually in two years. Siyempre, pirma kami agad ng nanay ko. Aba, e noon lang ako kikita nang ganoon kalaking halaga, e. Dona Sisang said she would change my name to something easier to remember, tipong Mila del Sol. The next day, I was walking at the studio when Mr. Generoso called me, Nida na raw ang pangalan ko. “Yung “Blanca” came a day later, Masyado raw kasi akong mapuiti kaya Blanca. I was introduced as the goddess of the moon in “Venus” which starred Lilia Dizon…” – Mario Bautista, Philippines Daily Express December 29 1978 (READ MORE)

Dramatic Role – “…Pero may isang regret si Nida sa loob ng tatlumpu’t isang taon niyang pamamalagi sa daigdig ng pelikula. “Frustration ko talaga na na-typecast ako strictly sa musical comedies,” pagkukuwento nya sa amin sa presscon ng Always in My Heart, ang pinakabago niyang pelikula opposite Dolphy, “Kasi, nang mapareha na ‘ko kay Nestor, puro ganon na lang ang ginawa namin. Later, I talked to some komiks novelists at kinumbinsi ko silang magsulat ng mga nobelang drama para sa akin. Mga tatlong nobela ‘yon like Malvarosa, ang hitsura ng bida doon sa komiks, talagang ginawa nilang kamukha ko. Pero the role went to Charito Solis. Talagang I also wanted to be recognized as a good dramatic actress. After all, my role in Korea, where I won the first Famas bes supporting actress award in 1952, was dramatic naman. “Kaya lang, si Donya Sisang would always tell me,” at sa kanayng pagkukuwento ay nagboses matanda pa siya na ginagaya ng namayapang LVN matriarch, “Sa musical ka na lang. Ibigay na natin kina Charito Solis at Rosa Rosal ‘yang drama-drama. Kaya nga ‘yang mga Malvarosa at Krisalit at Badjao na ‘yan, sa kanila napunta. I had a good role in Sa Atin Ang Daigdig na damatic din naman pero maikli lang ‘yon at marami kami sa pelikula. But mind you, hindi pa rin ako nawawalan ng pag-asa. Malay mo, baka in the future, magkarron pa rin ako ng meaty role na pangaward…Gloria (Romero) came from a rival studio but I never really considered her as a competitor. You know naman how the press played up these things, na kami ay box office opponents. Pero ba’t naman ako patatangay sa publicity. Kaibigan ko si Gloria and we even made a movie together noon sa sarili kong production, ang Huwag Ka Nang Magtampo, with Nestor and Luis Gonzales. Upt to now, she is still a frend. And she is one actress I really admire…” – Mario Bautisa, Movie Flash 1983 (READ MORE)

Dorothy Acueza Jones, (January 6, 1936 – November 7, 2001) popularly known by her stage name Nida Blanca, was a Filipina actress. She starred in over 163 movies and 14 television shows and received over 16 awards for movies and six awards for television during her 50-year film career. She was named one of 15 Best Actress of all Time by YES magazine. She was stabbed to death in a parking lot in San Juan City on November 7, 2001. – Wikipedia (READ MORE)

Nida Blanca and Vilma Santos

Nida Blanca and Vilma Santos first film together was in 1969, a Dolphy-Nida starrer, Vi played a minor roles. The next film was an all star cast film featuring several big stars of the major studios. The last film they did together was a mother-daughter film directed by the underrated director, Elwood Perez. Although they only did three films, the two has some similarities in terms of their show biz career. One was they’re both became a grand slam awardee, Vi in 1982 and Nida in 1986. Also, they’re both good in dancing and became a popular TV stars with Vilma in her musical variety show, Vilma! and Nida with her comedy sitcom, John en Marsha. On 1998 they shared the best actress award from Star Awards for Movies.

Ibulong mo sa Diyos (1988) – “…Vilma hit the jackpot. After 11 nominations with four wins, her twelfth nomniation produced her an unexpected win. It elevated her to the hall of fame status. All artist who wins five automatically put them to the hall of fame list. It is a big honour but prohibit any one on the list to compete in the future for the same category. Regal films’ Ibulong Mo Sa Diyos, directed by Elwood Perez was a surprised winner. Not only it earned Vilma her fifth award as best actress, it also gave the late Miguel Rodriguez a best supporting actor award and the best director for Perez. Technical awards were also given to Ricardo Jacinto, cinematography, Rey Maliuanag, production design, Gary Valenciano, theme song, and George Jarlego, editing. The late Nida Blanca was also nominated for best supporting actress…” – RV (READ MORE)

Happy Days Are Here Again (1974) – “…In 1974, the Big 3 studios of the 50s, LVN Pictures, Sampaguita Pictures and Premiere Productions reproduced a full-length movie showcasing a compilation of the musical comedies produced by the three studios. It was a painstaking job for the researchers since most of the best musicals produced by the three studios were either lost or destroyed. At the start of the project, director Lamberto V. Avellana was supposed to direct the film but eventually replaced by Ciro Santiago after so many changes in the project including the script. He ended up as consultant of the movie. The film was Happy Days Are Here Again, with brief narrations by movie stars like Gloria Romero, Nida Blanca, Susan Roces, Leopoldo Salcedo, Jaime de la Rosa, Eddie Gutierrez, Tirso Cruz III, Pugo, German Moreno and Ike Lozada…” – Pelikula Atbp (READ MORE)

Pag-ibig Masdan Ang Ginawa Mo (1969) – “…Nakagawa din si Vi ng pelikula na si Luciano B. Carlos ang direktor at ito ay sa mga pelikulang Pag-ibig Masdan Ang Ginawa Mo (1969), Teribol Dobol (1975) at Let’s Do The Salsa (1976)…” – Alfonso Valencia (READ MORE)

Related Reading:

Miss X (Videos)

Basic Information: Filipina prostitute living in red district of Amsterdam. Directed by Gil Portes, written by Ricardo Lee and Cast: Vilma Santos, Mark Gil. The film’s theme song. “Dito Ba?” was composed by George Canseco and performed by Kuh Ledesma. The film won the 1980 FAMAS Best Musical Score for George Canseco.

RELATED READING:

2000 Gawad Dekada

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Gawad Dekada “…The Gawad Dekada will also name the top actors and actresses of the ’90s. In the running are the Gawad Urian best acting winners in lead and supporting roles. They include Vilma Santos (“Ipagpatawad Mo,” “Dahil Mahal Kita: The Dolzura Cortez Story,” and “Bata, Batra”)…Expect the Nora Aunor-Vilma Santos rivalry to heat up to the Gawad Dekada. It is without question the two dominated the ’90s as far as the Gawad Urian was concerned, with each winning three best actress plums that decade. It is notable, however, that on two of those three occassions, Nora had to share the trophy with another actress – in 1993 with Helen Gamboa, who essayed Flor Contemplacion in Tikoy Aguiluz’s “Bagong Bayarni” (quite an irony sice Nora won her trophy for playing the same role in Joel Lamangan’s “The Flor Contemplacion Story), and in 1996 with Sharon Cuneta, who won for Madrasta (Nora won for “Bakit May Kahapon Pa?”). In contrast, Vilma did not share her trophies with anyone. But as one critic of the critics said, those were the rare times when the Manunuri made up their minds. In most instances, they couldn’t. That’s why the Gawad Urian has become noted for its surprising ties, which aren’t surprising anymore…” – Marinel R. Cruiz, Philippine Daily Inquirer, March 18, 2001 (READ MORE)

Freedom of Expression – While the country’s film critics protested the current clampdown on freedom of expression, movie stars, led by the inimitable Rosanna Roces, had a ball poking fun at the system during the recent Urian awards night. Osang, the evening’s lone female host, brimmed with naughty retorts and double entendres on and off the air while hosting the five-hour show with filmdoms’s leading heartthrobs led by Richard Gomez. Goma also expressed his indignation by wearing a black armband like the rest of the members of Manunuri. Other hosts in the stellar lineup were Diether Ocampo, Rustom Padilla and Dingdong Dantes. “Do you want me to stage a live show, Diet (Ocampo)? Osang, clad a revealing white gown by Maxi Cinco, asked in Filipino. “Please, no,” said Diether, feigning alarm. “Let’s just introduce our next set of nominees who are good at cutting films. And they’re not from MTRCB, Osang.” Diether was acturally referring to contenders in the best editing category. Speaking of cuts outrageously high to reveal her ample waist and thighs. A thin rhinestone-studded belt held the dress together. Photographers scrambled for the best positions as Osang emerged in Cinco’s creations. She earlier wore a more decent red gown by Rajo Laurel that covered her vital statistics. But trust Osang not to let the ngiht past without ruffling the feathers of “moral terrorists,” as former MTRCB chair and Manunuri member Nicanor Tiongson described his detractors. Osang tried to appear nonchalant at first, but seeing the swarm of photographers pointing their cameras her way during a commercial break, she gamely tilted her body to one side to reveal her flawless gams. “O, sige na nga,” she giggled, before a burst of flashbulbs greeted her. “This is waht you call freedom of expression,” she winked, as she leaned again to reveal her other side. Richard, who was beside her, could only smile and shake his head.

Five-minute break – Members of the Manunuri deemed it wise to give themselves and their guest a five-minute break halfway into the nearly five-hour show. It was the first time in our long years of covering such marathon events that both fans and celebrities received such courtesy. All of them, of course, show a deep respect for Filipiniana and the performing arts. This was literally reflected in a stage featuring a Filipino-Spanish inspired home, garden and trellis covered with real and artificial greens. Gardeners later took advantage of a lull in the show to sprinkle the plants. A number of the Manunuri members reportedly protested the producer’s choice of Ruffa Gutierrez, who annotated the Gawad Dekada in taped snippets during certain portions of the show. Principled souls were said to have deemed Ruffa, who was embroiled in theinfamous Manila Film Festival scam seven years ago, unacceptable. Lorna Tolentino, also a taped annotator like Ruffa, was said to have declined the job soon after learning that she wasn’t in the best circle. Friends and supporters reportedly prevailed upon her to put her tampo aside.

Noranians vs Vilmanians – As usual, die-hard Noranians and Vilmanians managed to sneak in despite the presence of ushers and usherettes. Their admiration for their respective idols again degenerated into a shouting match. Both Nora Aunor and Vilma Santos were recipients of the Gawad Dekada for winning the highest number of best actress awards during the past decade – three each. Vilma caused a pandemonium as her eager fans cheered her arrival. Vilmanians positioned themselves on the left side of the theater, while Noranians, wearing identical aqua T-shirts, later occupied the other side. Richard egged them on. “Don’t worry, the other camp (Nora) is expected to arrive, too,” he said in Taglish. Rustome further fanned the rivalry by asking each of them to make their presence felt as he pointed from one group to another. Ofcourse, they lost no time shouting at the top of their lungs. Talent manager Douglas Quijano was rudely interrupted when Nora, wearing a black suit, marched into theater followed by her rowdy band of loyalists. They shouted and waved aqua banners at the mere mention of Nora’s name. A big placard held by one of the Superstar’s supporters screamed, “We love you, Ate Guy!!! – GANAP.” “Nora! Nora! Nora! they chanted like a mantra as she went up the stage to recieve her Gawad Dekada. Vilmanians didn’t take things sitting down. They also carried a set of similar posters that formed their idol’s name and a tagline, “D Real Queen.” Several diehards even held aloft campaign posters of senatorial wannabe Ralp Recto, Vilma’s better half. Noranians were stilled as Vilma, in a semi-beaded aqua gown that ironically matched the T-shirts worn by her archrival’s admirers, went onstage. It was the Star for all Season’s fans’ turn to chant her name: “Vilma! Vilma! Vilma!” For a few moments, members of the Manunuri dropped their clenched fists as people inside the theater became too enthralled by the spectacle. Not even Osang’s glib tongue and outrageous outfit could probably match that. – Alex Y. Vergara, Philippine Daily Inquirer, April 02, 2003 (READ MORE)

Pilyang Engkantada (1976)

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Basic Information: Direction: Jose Miranda Cruz; Story and Screenplay: Artemio Marquez; Cast: Don Don Nakar, Ike Lozada, Winnie Santos, Luz Fernandez, Mar Quijano, Sylvio Ramiro, Allan Valenzuela; Original Music: Angel Cruz; Cinematography; Eduardo Cabrales; Release Date: 22 October 1976; Production Co: Tropical Films

Plot Description: No Available Data

Film Achievement: No Available Data

Film Review: “…Those who grew up in the 70s would probably remember Winnie Santos and Dondon Nakar. The two belonged to the popular group “Apat na Sikat” with two other teen stars Lala Aunor and Arnold Gamboa…” – Simon Santos, Video 48 (READ MORE)

Related Reading:

FILM REVIEW: BURLESK QUEEN

The Plot: To support her paralytic father, Chato (Vilma Santos) works as a utility girl for a burlesque star Virgie Nite (Rosemary Gil). But when Virgie gets drunk on the night of her scheduled show, Chato pitches in for her. And she becomes an instant sensation. Enthused by the initial acceptance of the audience, she defies her father’s admonitions and presents herself to the manager. And thus, becoming the new burlesque queen. – IMDB

The Reviews: Si Celso Ad. Castillo ay marami nang naunang eksperimento. Pero pumaltos sa pamantayan ng mga manunuri. Maraming nagsuspetsa na may ibubuga siya, pero hindi lang talaga maibuga nang nasa tiempo. Malimit ang kanyang pelikula ay maingay at maraming sobra. Halimbawa, maraming karahasan na wala namang katuturan ang kanyang Madugong Daigdig ni Salvacion, seksing walang kadahilanan (pinagandang garapal) ang kanyang Pinakamagandang Hayop sa Balat ng Lupa, numero unong manggagaya ang kanyang Maligno, at sabog-sabog ang kanyang pinakamagandang nagawa, ang Daluyong at Habagat. Kung may magkamali mang pumuri kay Celso, iyon nama’y halos pakunsuelo-de-bobo lamang, at hindi ito sapat para itaas ang kanyang pedestal sa ranggo nina Bernal, Brocka at Romero. Wari ngang napako sa komersiyalismo ang direktor na inaabangan maglalabas ng natatagong talino. Lalong nagduda sa kanyang kakayahan ang mga kritiko nang kumalat ang balita na gagawa siya ng serye sa TV na ala Cleopatra Jones na papamagatan naman niyang O’Hara. Pero ang direktor na ipinapalagay na laos ay biglang pumalag nang walang kaabog-abog. Bigla’y nabalitang may inihanda raw itong pang-festival na ikinataas na naman ng kilay ng kanyang mga kritiko. “Aber tingnan,” ang pasalubong sa balita. At sa preview ng kanyang Burlesk Queen, biglang napa-mea culpa ang ayaw maniwalang may ibubuga si Celso.

Tiyak na naiiba ang Burlesk Queen, kahit ikumpara sa mga naunang trabaho ni Celso at sa iba pang direktor na nagtangkang tumalakay sa paksang ito. Matagal-tagal na rin namang nauso ang kaputahan sa pelikula, pero walang nakapagbigay ng katarungan sa lahi ni Eba bilang Pilipina at bilang puta. Sa Burlesk Queen, para kay Celso ay hindi nangangahulugan ng pagpapakita lamang ng utong, puwit o singit, kung hindi isang seryosong pagtalakay sa damdamin ng mga tauhan sa isang kapanipaniwalang dahilan na nangyari sa isang makatotohanang kapaligiran. Sa kanya, ang tao ay hindi basta maghuhubad at magtatalik. Maraming pangyayari sa buhay ang dapat munang linawin at unawain, at iyon ang basehan ng kasaysayan. Simple lamang ang plot. Isang tinedyer si Vilma Santos na alalay ng isang original burlesk queen, si Rosemarie Gil. May tatay na lumpo si Vilma, si Leopoldo Salcedo. Si Rosemarie naman ay may kabit na isang hustler, si Roldan Aquino. Nang iwanan ni Roldan si Rose, nagwala ang huli. Naging lasengga siya at tumangging magsayaw sa tanghalan. Mabibitin ang palatuntunan, kaya’t si Vilma na talaga namang may ambisyong magsayaw ang pumalit. Hit naman sa manonood si Vilma. Sa bahay, pilit kinukumbinsi ni Vilma si Pol na payagan na siyang maging full time dancer. Ayaw ni Pol, mas mahalaga sa kanya ang prinsipyo at delikadesa. Sapagkat wala namang ibang pagkakakitaan, si Vilma rin ang nasunod sa bandang huli. Nag-suicide si Pol nang hindi na niya masikmura ang pasiya ng anak. Si Rollie Quizon naman ang binatilyong masama ang tama kay Vilma. Nagtanan sila at nagsama. Pero hindi sanay sa hirap si Rollie. Sa pagpili sa pag-ibig o ginhawa sa buhay, ang huli ang pinahalagahan niya. Nagkataon namang buntis na si Vilma. Sa pag-iisa sa buhay, nagbalik siya sa pagsasayaw. Nagsayaw siya ng nagsayaw hanggang duguin siya sa tanghalan at malaglag ang kanyang dinadala.

Bagamat simple ang plot ay hindi naman masasabing simple ang pamamaraang ginawa rito ni Celso. Sa kauna-unahang pagkakataon ay nangyari sa isang pelikula ang pagsasama-sama ng magandang istorya, mahusay na direksyon, magaling na pag-arte ng mga tauhan, masinop na musika, magaling na editing at angkop na sinematograpiya. Sa Burlesk Queen ay nagsama-sama ang talino ni Celso (direktor), Mauro Gia Samonte (story and screenplay), George Canseco (musical director), Ben Lobo (cinematographer), at Abelardo Hulleza (editor). Kung may ipipintas sa pelikula, iyon ay ang hindi malinaw na pagbuhay sa panahon na nangyari ang kuwento. Kung minsa’y maiisip na nagyari ito sa panahon ng kasikatan ni Elvis noong 1950s. Pero kapag pinansin na maraming long hair sa extra, may wall paper at synthetic na sako ang bahay nina Vilma ay maaari namang sabihing baka naman pa-Elvis craze lamang ang mga tao roon. Pero may pulitiko, at Yabut, at may dagdag pang Connie Francis bukod sa motorsiklong Lambretta at mga kotseng Buick. Kung sabagay, maliliit na detalye lamang ito na agad makakalimutan kapag ang inasikaso ay pagbuklat sa magagandang punto ng istorya. Tingnan natin ang ilang magandang eksena sa pelikula. Sa ikalawang eksena ay nagtatanong si Vilma kay Rosemarie kung puwede rin siyang maging dancer. Walang malinaw na sagot si Rose, pero ang timing ng background music na It’s Now or Never ay makahulugan. It’s Now or Never nga, payo ni Elvis. At kung kailan siya maaaring mag-umpisa, Tomorrow, sabi ng kanta. Ang ganitong sagot ay nasa mukha ni Rose, pero hindi na kailangang sabihin. Ang ganitong pamamaraan ay tinatawag na creativity ng direktor, na nagdagdag ng ibang pamamaraan sa paghahayag ng damdamin ng tauhan.

Sa paglakad ng istorya, dapat ding pansinin kung paano ang characterization ay binubuhay dito. Halimbawa, sa isang eksena na nangyari sa isang patahian ay nag-abot sina Dexter Doria, ang bagong kabit ni Roldan Aquino, at si Rose. Naroroon din si Vilma at sa hindi kalayuan ay si Rollie. Maliwanag na may kani-kanyang pangangailangan ang mga tauhan at magkakasama sila sa iisang eksena. Walang nakawan ng eksena na naganap dito. Nag-insultuhan sina Dexter at Rose, natameme si Roldan at waring walang pakialam sina Rollie at Vilma na panay na panay ang kindatan. Lalo namang walang pakialam ang dalawang pulubi na tumutugtog ng violin (na siya ring background music) sa mga nangyayari. Limos ang mahalaga sa kanila. Sa eksenang ito’y may gamit ang lahat ng tauhan, wala sa kanilang nagsilbing dekorasyon, walang nag-o.a. at pare-pareho nilang ginawang makatotohanan ang komprontasyon. Magandang halimbawa ito ng synchronized acting. Kung allusions naman ang pag-uusapan, marami ritong mga sariwang metaphor na mababanggit. Isa rito ang mahusay na pagpapakita na birhen pa si Vilma sa sex act nila ni Rollie. Habang nasa likod ng tanghalan ay may nagaganap sa magkasintahan, sa tanghalan ay nang-aliw naman ang mga acrobats na sinundan ng isang madyikero na tumutusok ng sariling noo, nagbabaon ng pako sa ilong at lumululon ng espada. Masakit tingnan iyon. At ganoon din ang nararanasan ni Vilma sa likod ng tanghalan sa piling ni Rollie. Hindi rin madaldal ang pelikula. Kung itatanong kung paano tinanggap ni Pol ang pasiya ng anak, nagtulos na lamang siya ng isang makahulugang kandila sa altar na para na ring sinabing “bahala na ang Diyos sa iyo”. Kung paano naman ipinakitang naging mananayaw na nga si Vilma, sapat nang ipakita ang isang trak na nagbababa ng isang wheel chair na ipapalit sa lumang tumba-tumba ng ama.

Maging ang paglakad ng panahon ay nararamdaman din ng manonood kahit hindi ikuwento o ipakita ang kinagawiang pamamaraan at ulat ng “nalalaglag na dahon ng kalendaryo o dahon ng puno kaya”. Sunod-sunod na cuts na nagpapakita sa uri ng palabas sa tanghalang kinabibilangan ni Vilma ang ginawa ni Celso. Saka ito sinundan ng kuha naman sa bahay nina Vilma at Rollie. Nag-iinit ng tubig si Vilma habang nakikinig ng dula sa radyo tungkol sa buhay ng isang asawang tamad at iresponsable. Ganoon nga ang nangyayari sa buhay ng dalawa, at may kasunod ring “abangan sa susunod na kabanata”. Sa paghihiwalay ng dalawa, sapat na ring iparinig ang awiting You’re All I Want For Christmas, para buhayin ang irony na nagaganap sa relasyon ng dalawa. Kung makinis ang exposition at pagbuhay sa conflict ng istorya, malinaw rin ang paghahanda sa wakas ng pelikula. Si Rose na laos na ay naging mumurahing puta. Si Dexter kahit hindi ipakita ay maliwanag na sumama na sa ibang lalaki. Si Roldan ay may bago nang kabit at napatay sa spiral staircase ng tanghalan na siya rin niyang dinadaanan sa paghahatid sa dalawang naunang kabit. Si Rollie, ang mama’s boy, ay natural bawiin ng ina. Si Vilma ay nagsayaw-nang-nagsayaw. Sa simula’y mahinhin at nakangiti at kaakit-akit hanggang sa pagbilis ng pulso ng tambol at pompiyang ay naubusan ng ngiti, tumagaktak ang pawis at manghina ang ligwak ng kanyang balakang, upang sa pagbuhay sa damdamin ng manonood ay siya namang maging dahilan ng pagkalaglag ng sanggol na kanyang dinadala. Sa labas, matapos ang pagtatanghal, may tatlong bagabundong naiwan na nakatangkod sa larawang pang ‘come on’ ng burlesk queen, habang ang kadilima’y bumabalot sa kapaligiran. Kung matino ang kaanyuan ng pelikula, ay ganoon din ang masasabi sa nilalaman. Makatotohanan at masinop ang pagtalakay sa buhay ng isang abang mananayaw. Tinalakay rin dito kung paano siya tinatanggap ng lipunan at inuusig ng mga tagapangalaga raw ng moralidad. Maging ang empresaryo ng tanghalan na ginampanan ni Joonee Gamboa ay may konsiyensiya rin at nagtatanong sa atin kung anong panoorin ang dapat ibigay sa isang ordinaryong Pilipino na hindi kayang pumunta sa mga mamahaling kainan upang manood tulad halimbawa ng Merry Widow at Boys in the Band. Sila, aniya ng mga ‘dakilang alagad ng moralidad na nagdidikta at kumu-kontrol sa moralidad ng komunidad’, katapat ng munting kasiyahan ng isang Pilipinong hindi ‘kaya ang bayad sa mga ekslusibong palabas ng mayayaman.’ Samantala’y busy tayo sa paglilibang at sa kanila’y walang pakialam ngunit may handang pintas at pula sa mangahas lumabas sa batas ng moralidad ng lipunan. – Jun Cruz Reyes, Manila magazine Dec. 1977 (READ MORE)

Celso Ad. Castillo’s Burlesk Queen (Burlesque Queen) is most famous for Vilma Santos’ noteworthy performance. She plays Chato, daughter of crippled Roque (Leopoldo Salcedo). She works as assistant to Virgie (Rosemarie Gil), current star of the burlesque stage (the film opens with Gil gyrating to the rapid beatings of drums, to the ecstasy of her numerous patrons). Resisting the lofty wishes of her father, Chato succumbs to the lure of the stage and the money it would bring her. It really is a grand performance as Santos was able to deliver the physical requirements of the role with her inate charismatic aura (a skill that earned the actress legions of fans and eventually elected to public office). Santos’ Chato is servile to the men around her (her father, Louie the theater manager (played by Joonee Gamboa in the film’s other equally terrific performance) and Jessie (Rolly Quizon), her boyfriend) but when she dances onstage, it doesn’t come off as merely sensual and titillating. She dances burlesque to make a statement (if there is such a thing), a statement important enough to die for. More remarkable than Santos’ portrayal of the doomed burlesque dancer, is Castillo’s filmmaking. Set within the very patriarchal lower class Manila, Castillo posits the burlesque theater as not merely, as impassioned Louie points out, a place for highbrow entertainment for the masses, but also the window for the film’s female lead to become superior to her male oppressors. It’s a difficult metaphor to execute but Castillo successfully does so. The dancer, scantilly clad amidst the cheers and jeers of horny men, is easily regarded as the victim of exploitation. But in the film’s case, the stage becomes the dancer’s opportunity for leverage which is impossible in the outside world. The stage provides Chato ease from the outside world’s patriarchal clutches. She becomes financially stable on her own, temporarily free from her father’s influences, and powerful over thousands of men.

Interestingly, Castillo stages a poetically sequenced scene of Chato’s devirginization within the theater. Jessie attempts to make love to Chato inside her dressing room, and the latter submits to the former’s sexual advances. Interspersed between their lovemaking (take note of the ballad that plays in the background as the lyrics talk of love amidst the entire world’s disapproval, very typical of the romantic declarations that inevitably falter over time) are scenes from the stage, a circus act of horrid penetrations: of a woman being juggled by a man, several magic acts, and more importantly, of a man hammering a nail inside his nostril, then puncturing his eye socket with a metal stick, finally commencing with him swallowing a long blade. Castillo’s juxtaposing Chato’s first sexual act with acts of unnatural and bizarre penetrations of the human body impart a clear message of invasion, of Chato’s theater where she is the goddess (her stage name is Tsarina the goddess) and almighty over all the men who watch her. The theater is no longer the same sanctuary; in a way, the theater’s magic has been tainted. She becomes pregnant and decides to stop dancing pursuant to her relationship with Jessie and pregnancy. Her devirginization within the theater becomes symbolic of her surrender to the outside patriarchal forces.

The burlesque is in its dying days. Submitting to the very same patriarchal forces that have established strict moral norms and economic systems, the government has deemed the dance to be lewd and illegal. Louis plans that the final burlesque performance be the best and we become witnesses to the plan’s grand execution: a judiciously edited montage of circus acts, musical numbers, costumed dances and finally Chato’s coup de grace to both the theater and to herself. In a hypnotized daze with spotlights concentrating on her rhythmic gyrations, she enchants her audience. Once more, she is a goddess, the most powerful person in that wide area full of men. Her reign is shortlived for she is pregnant with Jessie’s child and starts bleeding. Castillo cuts to Chato’s face, sweaty and in pain and we hear as her heavy breathing joins the rapid beating of the drums. The camera pans down, and we see her belly dangerously shaking as blood continuously flows down her thighs. This is Chato’s repentance, a fatal undoing of her naive betrayal of the stage to succumb to patriarchal forces. Chato reluctantly stops and presumably dies as the crowd cheers on.

A jovial and sweet melody replaces the hurried beating of the drums and the boisterous cheers. The theater is empty. The hundred or so seats have no eager men sitting on them. A dusty curtain covers the once vibrant stage. Pictures of the burlesque dancers, more prominently Chato, are on display. Outside, a couple of players, including the Filipino version of Chaplin (complete with the trademark hat and cane of The Tramp), are waiting. They stand up and trod through the alley. The film closes with them walking away from the theater, reminiscent of the bittersweet finales of Charlie Chaplin’s comedies (more specifically The Circus (1928) and Modern Times (1936)). Of course, Burlesk Queen is nowhere like Chaplin’s films yet the ending feels irresistably apt, an intriguingly ironic hommage. The living remnants of the theater, those bitplayers walking away, have no bright future. Like Chato, the theater is their sanctuary and survival. The real world, the desolate and unfair lower class Manila of which they are ultimately going to, has no place for them. The melody, the memories, and the transient burlesque queen that once charmed a thousand men with the movement of her hips have been drowned by hopelessness. They shall all remain tramps. Burlesk Queen is much more than a gripping commercial melodrama. It is also a scathing commentary on the sarcastic sexual politics that has become the atmosphere of Philippine society: of hardworking women and the good-for-nothing men they serve (in other words, a patriarchal society gone awry). It is also a fervent reminder of the redemptive and equalizing power of art, which is the reason why it will always be a threat to those who hold power. Multi-faceted, committedly acted, and very well-directed, Burlesk Queen, I opine, is an unsung masterpiece. – Max Blog (READ MORE)

“…I have my own orientation in film criticism…because we’re Third World, to me a film is, first of all, a social document, then an educational tool, and third, an aesthetic experience. If I have to name three important Tagalog movies of all time based on these criteria, they would have to be Brocka’s Maynila sa Mga Kuko ng Liwanag – acutally I can name four – Castillo’s Burlesk Queen, Romero’s Aguila, Gallaga’s Oro, Plata, Mata.” – Rafael Ma. Guerrero, Film critic (READ MORE)

“…Tuloy-tuloy ‘yun…(the hospital scense with Vilma and Leopoldo Salcedo) nag-experiment ako noong una, kumuha ako ng second take, pero di ko na rin tinapos. Perfect na iyong una. Alam mo bang nang gawin namin ang eksenang iyon tatlo kaming umiiyak sa set? Ako, si Vilma, at si Leopoldo? Dalang-dala si Leopoldo sa pagsasalita ni Vilma, lumuha siya kahit patay siya dapat doon. Buti na lang di siya nakuha ng kamera…(Kung Nahirapan ka ba kay Vilma?) …Oo, hindi sa acting dahil mahusay talaga siya kundi sa scheduling. Alam mo kasi it takes time before I can really get into the mood of a picture, mga two weeks, tapos kapag nandiyan na, that’s the stage when I’m ready to give my life to the project. Tapos biglang walang shooting ng two weeks dahil busy siya sa ibang pelikula…” – Ricardo Lee, Manila Magazine, Dec 1- 31, 1977

“…More remarkable than Santos’ portrayal of the doomed burlesque dancer, is Castillo’s filmmaking. Set within the very patriarchal lower class Manila, Castillo posits the burlesque theater as not merely, as impassioned Louie points out, a place for highbrow entertainment for the masses, but also the window for the film’s female lead to become superior to her male oppressors. It’s a difficult metaphor to execute but Castillo successfully does so. The dancer, scantilly clad amidst the cheers and jeers of horny men, is easily regarded as the victim of exploitation. But in the film’s case, the stage becomes the dancer’s opportunity for leverage which is impossible in the outside world. The stage provides Chato ease from the outside world’s patriarchal clutches. She becomes financially stable on her own, temporarily free from her father’s influences, and powerful over thousands of men. Interestingly, Castillo stages a poetically sequenced scene of Chato’s devirginization within the theater. Jessie attempts to make love to Chato inside her dressing room, and the latter submits to the former’s sexual advances. Interspersed between their lovemaking (take note of the ballad that plays in the background as the lyrics talk of love amidst the entire world’s disapproval, very typical of the romantic declarations that inevitably falter over time) are scenes from the stage, a circus act of horrid penetrations: of a woman being juggled by a man, several magic acts, and more importantly, of a man hammering a nail inside his nostril, then puncturing his eye socket with a metal stick, finally commencing with him swallowing a long blade. Castillo’s juxtaposing Chato’s first sexual act with acts of unnatural and bizarre penetrations of the human body impart a clear message of invasion, of Chato’s theater where she is the goddess (her stage name is Tsarina the goddess) and almighty over all the men who watch her. The theater is no longer the same sanctuary; in a way, the theater’s magic has been tainted. She becomes pregnant and decides to stop dancing pursuant to her relationship with Jessie and pregnancy. Her devirginization within the theater becomes symbolic of her surrender to the outside patriarchal forces…Burlesk Queen is much more than a gripping commercial melodrama. It is also a scathing commentary on the sexual politics that has become the atmosphere of Philippine society: of hardworking women and the good-for-nothing men they serve; of a patriarchal society gone awry. It is also a fervent reminder of the redemptive and equalizing power of art. Multi-faceted, committedly acted, and very well-directed, Burlesk Queen, I opine, is an unsung masterpiece.” – Oggs Cruz (READ MORE)

“(about the hospital scense with Vilma and Leopoldo Salcedo) Tuloy-tuloy ‘yun. nag-experiment ako noong una, kumuha ako ng second take, pero di ko na rin tinapos. Perfect na iyong una. Alam mo bang nang gawin namin ang eksenang iyon tatlo kaming umiiyak sa set? Ako, si Vilma, at si Leopoldo? Dalang-dala si Leopoldo sa pagsasalita ni Vilma, lumuha siya kahit patay siya dapat doon. Buti na lang di siya nakuha ng kamera…(Kung Nahirapan ka ba kay Vilma?) …Oo, hindi sa acting dahil mahusay talaga siya kundi sa scheduling. Alam mo kasi it takes time before I can really get into the mood of a picture, mga two weeks, tapos kapag nandiyan na, that’s the stage when I’m ready to give my life to the project. Tapos biglang walang shooting ng two weeks dahil busy siya sa ibang pelikula…” – Ricardo Lee, Manila magazine Dec. 1- 31, 1977 (READ MORE)

“…When Burlesk Queen was offered to her, Vilma bided her time until she talked with her parents. “Okay,” her Mama agreed, “as long as the sexy scenes would be treated well.” Says Vilma: “I am liberated in the sense that I have moved out of the family residence. Why did I do it? Because I feel I am old enough to take care of myself, gusto ko namang masubukan ang independence. I feel that I am old enough to know what I want. “Ngayon,” she adds, “anu’t-ano pa man ang mangyari, buhay ko na ito. Kung madapa man ako, sisikapin ko nang bumangon ng sarili ko.” Her kind of liberation includes freedom to choose her dates and to go out unchaperoned. To criticisms about her going out with a married man, Vilma snorts: “Ako naman, I don’t care whether a man is a sinner or a saint. Basta niri-respeto niya ako at ang pamilya ko, niri-respeto ko rin siya…It took us almost seven nights, shooting straight, to finish that sequence. I learned the dance from an expert real-life burlesque dancer. During shootings, palaging close-door. My God, I couldn’t have done it with so many people around.” She had to take several shots of brandy before the shooting. “Otherwise, I could have died from nervousness. ”According to Romy Ching, producer of Burlesk Queen, he didn’t really have the Metro Filmfest in mind because he had a November 25 playdate. But when he saw the rushes, he changed plans. “Hindi ka magsisisi na tinanggap mo ito,” he told Vilma, “it will be worth it.” Says Vilma: “I didn’t expect to win, although marami ang nagsasabi sa akin na malaki ang pag-asa ko. Ako naman, I don’t believe anything unless talagang nangyayari. Kasi noon, I expected to win, sa film festival din sa Quezon City, but somebody else did. I was very disappointed. Noong awards night nga, I wasn’t convinced I would win hanggang hindi ko pa hawak ‘yong trophy…” – Ricardo F. Lo, Expressweek Magazine January 19, 1978 (READ MORE)

“…When she cried foul when Rollie Quizon left her for his domineering mother in Burlesk Queen, Filipino women can relate with her anguish. A mama’s boy leaving his striper lover to go back to the luxury of home. Chato still very relevant today. The beerhouses and burlesk clubs no longer a major force in Ermita, now a toro-toro replaced them but the flight of Chato still very much existed with her story line of her decision to have an abortion symbolically reflected to its last few scenes. Her dancing to her death, bleeding to show the cruelty of her life. Vilma’s portrayal, subtle, physical and deeply emoted in her dialogues and eyes. Leopoldo Salcedo’s refusal to admit his daughter became like her mother but her disability and financial situation prevented him to control her dauther’s fate. Poverty one of issue that Mayor Vi has to tackled, very evident in Burlesk Queen….” – RV (READ MORE)

“Vilma is the first Filipino actress to be featured in Time Magaziine. – The Philippines: Let Them See Films. When politics became pretty much a one-man show in the Philippines, the people lost a prime source of entetainment. Part of the gap has been filled by a burhome-grown film industry, which displayed nine of its new productions at the Manila Film Festival last month. Some 2 million moviegoers saw the films. Some of the movies were historical dramas pointing up the search for a Filipino identity during the long years of Spanish rule. But the most acclaimed were contemporary stories with a heavy populist touch. The festival’s smash hit was Burlesk Queen, starring Filipino Superstar Vilma Santos. It tells the syrupy tale of a poor girl who turns to burlesque dancing to support a crippled father. She falls in love with the son of a politician, elopes with him, and then tragically loses him back to his possessive mother. The treacle is supplemented with some gritty argument about the rights and wrongs of burlesque, with a lefthanded dig at censors. Huffs the burlesque impresario at one point: “Who are they to dictate wha the people should see?” ” – Time Magazine Feb. 13, 1978 Vol. 111 No. 7 (READ MORE)

“…Truly, indeed, as montage requires, a film to be art must conform to the law governing organic unity in natural phenomena. Lenin, the great leader of the Russian proletarian revolution under whose influence Eisenstein developed the montage theory, puts it this way: “…the particular does not exist outside that relationship which leads to the general. The general exists only in the particular, through the particular.” Hence in Burlesk Queen, scene after scene, and detail after detail to their minutest proportions within each scene, nothing exists that is not within the central theme of burlesque. In this dress shop sequence, Virgie makes like unaffected by Ander’s having completely abandoned her for the club hostess, but in the dressing room where she repairs to after the verbal clash, she gives vent to all her sorrow from having lost Ander forever. At precisely this point, Chato is exchanging love gazes with Jessie. Here we have a pretty lucid illustration of a rule in dramaturgy that has been a tradition of Greek tragedies whereby qualitative leaps in thematic development are always in the opposite. Chato’s joy at a nascent love affair with Jessie is contraposed to Virgie’s grief brought about by the end of her relationship with Ander. Yet though such qualitative leaps go separate ways, they stay confined within a seeming thematic parallel by which both leaps contribute to the building of a compositional structure necessary to maintain the organic unity begun earlier on at the opening. Virgie drops into depression and is so drunk during one burlesque presentation in the theater that she is not able to answer the call when her number comes. Now, who should come onstage to take Virgie’s place just so to placate a maddened crowd but a young dancer—Chato!…” – Mao Gia Samonte, Manila Times February 12, 2009 (READ MORE)